Kamran A Mirza1, Suzette L Pereira2, Anne C Voss2, Michael J Tisdale3. 1. Nutritional Biomedicine, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: K.a.mirza@aston.ac.uk. 2. Abbott Nutrition, Research & Development, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. Nutritional Biomedicine, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Loss of skeletal muscle is the most debilitating feature of cancer cachexia, and there are few treatments available. The aim of this study was to compare the anticatabolic efficacy of L-leucine and the leucine metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (Ca-HMB) on muscle protein metabolism, both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Studies were conducted in mice bearing the cachexia-inducing murine adenocarcinoma 16 tumor, and in murine C2 C12 myotubes exposed to proteolysis-inducing factor, lipopolysaccharide, and angiotensin II. RESULTS: Both leucine and HMB were found to attenuate the increase in protein degradation and the decrease in protein synthesis in murine myotubes induced by proteolysis-inducing factor, lipopolysaccharide, and angiotensin II. However, HMB was more potent than leucine, because HMB at 50 μM produced essentially the same effect as leucine at 1 mM. Both leucine and HMB reduced the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as measured by the functional (chymotrypsin-like) enzyme activity of the proteasome in muscle lysates, as well as Western blot quantitation of protein levels of the structural/enzymatic proteasome subunits (20 S and 19 S) and the ubiquitin ligases (MuRF1 and MAFbx). In vivo studies in mice bearing the murine adenocarcinoma 16 tumor showed a low dose of Ca-HMB (0.25 g/kg) to be 60% more effective than leucine (1 g/kg) in attenuating loss of body weight over a 4-d period. CONCLUSION: These results favor the clinical feasibility of using Ca-HMB over high doses of leucine for the treatment of cancer cachexia.
OBJECTIVE: Loss of skeletal muscle is the most debilitating feature of cancer cachexia, and there are few treatments available. The aim of this study was to compare the anticatabolic efficacy of L-leucine and the leucine metabolite β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (Ca-HMB) on muscle protein metabolism, both in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Studies were conducted in mice bearing the cachexia-inducing murineadenocarcinoma 16 tumor, and in murineC2 C12 myotubes exposed to proteolysis-inducing factor, lipopolysaccharide, and angiotensin II. RESULTS: Both leucine and HMB were found to attenuate the increase in protein degradation and the decrease in protein synthesis in murine myotubes induced by proteolysis-inducing factor, lipopolysaccharide, and angiotensin II. However, HMB was more potent than leucine, because HMB at 50 μM produced essentially the same effect as leucine at 1 mM. Both leucine and HMB reduced the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as measured by the functional (chymotrypsin-like) enzyme activity of the proteasome in muscle lysates, as well as Western blot quantitation of protein levels of the structural/enzymatic proteasome subunits (20 S and 19 S) and the ubiquitin ligases (MuRF1 and MAFbx). In vivo studies in mice bearing the murineadenocarcinoma 16 tumor showed a low dose of Ca-HMB (0.25 g/kg) to be 60% more effective than leucine (1 g/kg) in attenuating loss of body weight over a 4-d period. CONCLUSION: These results favor the clinical feasibility of using Ca-HMB over high doses of leucine for the treatment of cancer cachexia.
Authors: María D Girón; José D Vílchez; Rafael Salto; Manuel Manzano; Natalia Sevillano; Nefertiti Campos; Josep M Argilés; Ricardo Rueda; José M López-Pedrosa Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Emidio M de Matos-Neto; Joanna D C C Lima; Welbert O de Pereira; Raquel G Figuerêdo; Daniela M Dos R Riccardi; Katrin Radloff; Rodrigo X das Neves; Rodolfo G Camargo; Linda F Maximiano; Flávio Tokeshi; José P Otoch; Romina Goldszmid; Niels O S Câmara; Giorgio Trinchieri; Paulo S M de Alcântara; Marília Seelaender Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 7.561