Literature DB >> 24984585

Coronary flow velocity reserve during pharmacologic stress echocardiography with normal contractility adds important prognostic value in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Jorge A Lowenstein1, Cristian Caniggia2, Graciela Rousse2, Miguel Amor2, María E Sánchez2, Diego Alasia2, Norberto Casso2, Alicia García3, Gustavo Zambrana2, Diego M Lowenstein Haber2, Victor Darú2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) increases the diagnostic sensitivity of stress echocardiography. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of CFVR in patients without new wall motion abnormalities during pharmacologic stress echocardiography.
METHODS: The outcomes of 651 patients with normal wall motion response during stress echocardiography with dobutamine up to 50 μg/kg/min (n = 351) or dipyridamole up to 0.84 mg/kg over 4 min (n = 300) were evaluated. CFVR was calculated simultaneously in the distal territory of the left anterior descending coronary artery. CFVR ≥ 2 was defined as normal. Major events considered during follow-up were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and late myocardial revascularization.
RESULTS: Normal CFVR was recorded in 523 patients and reduced CFVR in 128. During a mean follow-up period of 34.6 ± 18 months, 48 major events occurred, in 25 patients (4.8%) with normal and 23 patients (18%) with reduced CFVR; event-free survival was significantly different between patients with normal versus abnormal CFVR (P < .0001). Diabetes increased risk only in patients with abnormal CFVR (P = .05). In the multivariate analysis, CFVR and history of smoking were the only independent predictors of combined morbidity and mortality. Abnormal CFVR was associated with a higher event rate, independently of the pharmacologic stress technique used. The event hazard ratio was inversely proportional to CFVR.
CONCLUSIONS: CFVR was an independent predictor of mortality after pharmacologic stress echocardiography with normal wall motion, and the degree of decrease was associated with increased risk. Diabetes worsened prognosis only with abnormal CFVR.
Copyright © 2014 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary flow velocity reserve; Risk assessment; Stress echocardiographic prognosis; Stress echocardiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24984585     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  7 in total

Review 1.  Coronary Artery Imaging with Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography.

Authors:  Masaaki Takeuchi; Akemi Nakazono
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve Obtained on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography and its Correlation with Target Heart Rate.

Authors:  José Sebastião de Abreu; Eduardo Arrais Rocha; Isadora Sucupira Machado; Isabelle O Parahyba; Thais Brito Rocha; Fernando José Villar Nogueira Paes; Tereza Cristina Pinheiro Diogenes; Marília Esther Benevides de Abreu; Ana Gardenia Liberato Ponte Farias; Marcia Maria Carneiro; José Nogueira Paes
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

4.  Association of Isolated Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction With Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Data.

Authors:  Mark A Gdowski; Venkatesh L Murthy; Michelle Doering; Andrea G Monroy-Gonzalez; Riemer Slart; David L Brown
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mihir A Kelshiker; Henry Seligman; James P Howard; Haseeb Rahman; Michael Foley; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher A Rajkumar; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 35.855

6.  Diabetic microvascular complications are associated with reduced global longitudinal strain independent of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gokulan Pararajasingam; Laurits Juhl Heinsen; Johanna Larsson; Thomas Rueskov Andersen; Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Søren Auscher; Jørgen Hangaard; Rasmus Møgelvang; Kenneth Egstrup
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  The new clinical standard of integrated quadruple stress echocardiography with ABCD protocol.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Quirino Ciampi; Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik; Mădălina-Loredana Urluescu; Doralisa Morrone; Clara Carpeggiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.