| Literature DB >> 24982864 |
Ashiru Mohammad Hamza1, Nabilla Al-Sadat1, Siew Yim Loh2, Nowrozy Kamar Jahan3.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the predictors in the different aspects of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to measure the changes of functional status over time in a cohort of Nigerian stroke survivors. A prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals of Kano state of Nigeria where stroke survivors receive rehabilitation. The linguistic-validated Hausa versions of the stroke impact scale 3.0, modified Rankin scale, Barthel index and Beck depression inventory scales were used. Paired samples t-test was used to calculate the amount of changes that occur over time and the forward stepwise linear regression model was used to identify the predictors. A total of 233 stroke survivors were surveyed at 6 months, and 93% (217/233) were followed at 1 year after stroke. Functional disabilities were significantly reduced during the recovery phase. Motor impairment, disability, and level of depression were independent predictors of HRQoL in the multivariate regression analysis. The involvement of family members as caregivers is the key factor for those survivors with improved functional status. Thus, to enhance the quality of poststroke life, it is proposed that a holistic stroke rehabilitation service and an active involvement of family members are established at every possible level.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24982864 PMCID: PMC4058476 DOI: 10.1155/2014/350281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical characteristics of the stroke survivors (n = 233).
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Range | 19 to 82 |
| Mean | 58.76 ± 13.24 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 118 (50.6%) |
| Female | 115 (49.4%) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 5 (2.1%) |
| Married | 139 (59.7%) |
| Widow/widower | 70 (30%) |
| Divorced/separated | 19 (8.2%) |
| Residence | |
| Urban | 172 (73.8%) |
| Rural | 61 (26.2%) |
| Income | |
| Enough and save | 7 (3%) |
| Just enough | 101 (43.3%) |
| Not enough | 125 (53.6%) |
| Hospital treatment paid by | |
| Self-Support | 63 (27%) |
| Friends | 16 (6.9%) |
| Government support | 1 (0.4%) |
| Social security | 10 (4.3%) |
| Free | 31 (13.3%) |
| Family support | 112 (48.1) |
| Type of stroke | |
| Ischemic | 86 (36.9%) |
| Hemorrhagic | 24 (10.3%) |
| Indeterminate | 123 (52.8%) |
| Side of stroke | |
| Right | 123 (52.8%) |
| Left | 110 (47.2%) |
| Caregiver during recovery phase | |
| Spouse | 51 (21.9) |
| Children | 128 (54.9) |
| In-law | 2 (0.9) |
| Brother/sister/parents | 49 (21) |
| Employer | 3 (1.3) |
Changes in functional measures during recovery phase (6 months and one year after stroke).
| Functional measure | Six months ( | One Year ( | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Rankin scale (MRS)*** | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | −0.2 ± 0.5 |
| Barthel index (BI)*** | 60.5 ± 25.1 | 68.5 ± 18.8 | 8.0 ± 8.7 |
| Beck depression inventory (BDI)*** | 12.3 ± 5.0 | 10.3 ± 4.0 | −2.1 ± 1.9 |
Level of significance of P value: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***P < 0.001.
Changes in different dimensions of SIS during poststroke recovery phase.
| Different dimensions of SIS | Six months | One year | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength*** | 33.6 ± 21.5 | 37.6 ± 18.4 | 4.0 ± 7.0 |
| Hand function*** | 28.7 ± 25.1 | 31.2 ± 25.3 | 2.5 ± 5.4 |
| ADL*** | 46.4 ± 24.8 | 52.2 ± 22.7 | 5.4 ± 5.1 |
| Mobility*** | 49.8 ± 30.5 | 54.1 ± 27.6 | 3.6 ± 4.7 |
| Composite physical*** | 39.9 ± 21.3 | 43.8 ± 19.7 | 3.9 ± 3.2 |
| Memory and thinking* | 80.3 ± 22.2 | 80.9 ± 20.0 | 0.7 ± 4.1 |
| Emotion*** | 57.4 ± 12.3 | 54.3 ± 12.6 | −3.1 ± 10.0 |
| Communication*** | 78.4 ± 24.5 | 79.6 ± 21.8 | 1.2 ± 4.9 |
| Participation** | 39.8 ± 23.6 | 41.0 ± 22.4 | 1.2 ± 5.8 |
| Global recovery*** | 57.2 ± 19.9 | 62.9 ± 15.2 | 5.7 ± 7.5 |
Level of significance of P value: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***P < 0.001.
Predictors of stroke impact scale domains during poststroke recovery phase.
| Stroke impact scale domains | Six months Follow-up | One year Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized coefficient | Standard error |
| Standardized coefficient | Standard error |
| |
| Strength |
|
| ||||
| Modified Rankin scale | −0.523*** | 1.067 | −0.337*** | 1.424 | ||
| Beck depression inventory score | −0.265*** | 0.238 | −0.149* | 0.287 | ||
| Hand function |
|
| ||||
| Barthel index | 0.351*** | 0.061 | 0.402*** | 0.083 | ||
| Age | 0.220** | 0.123 | 0.285*** | 0.119 | ||
| Caregiver (spouse versus employer) | 0.240** | 4.453 | 0.236** | 4.309 | ||
| Activities of daily living (ADL) |
|
| ||||
| Barthel index | 0.722*** | 0.040 | 0.625*** | 0.055 | ||
| Caregiver (spouse versus employer) | 0.206*** | 2.599 | ||||
| Caregiver (children versus employer) | −0.182*** | 2.034 | ||||
| Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support) | 0.166*** | 2.259 | 0.132** | 2.221 | ||
| Hospital treatment charge (social security versus family support) | −0.143** | 5.001 | −0.192*** | 4.615 | ||
| Mobility |
|
| ||||
| Barthel index | 0.825*** | 0.044 | 0.767*** | 0.060 | ||
| Income (enough and save versus not enough) | 0.123** | 6.369 | ||||
| Hospital treatment charge (self-support versus family support) | 0.143** | 2.603 | ||||
| Composite physical domain |
|
| ||||
| Barthel index | 0.650*** | 0.042 | 0.567*** | 0.069 | ||
| Caregiver (children versus employer) | −0.195*** | 1.768 | −0.217*** | 1.657 | ||
| Hospital treatment charge (Social security versus family support) | −0.147*** | 3.915 | −0.127** | 3.743 | ||
| Beck depression inventory score | −0.184*** | 0.208 | ||||
| Memory and thinking |
|
| ||||
| Beck depression inventory score | −0.246*** | 0.284 | −0.236*** | 0.324 | ||
| Caregiver (Spouse versus employer) | 0.341*** | 3.485 | 0.183* | 3.632 | ||
| Age | 0.230** | 0.115 | 0.179* | 0.106 | ||
| Emotion |
|
| ||||
| Beck depression inventory score | −0.317*** | 0.178 | −0.217** | 0.194 | ||
| Marital status (widow versus divorce) | −0.229*** | 1.592 | −0.193** | 1.672 | ||
| Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support) | 0.192** | 1.651 | 0.227*** | 1.759 | ||
| Income (Just enough versus not enough) | 0.220*** | 1.495 | ||||
| Communication |
|
| ||||
| Caregiver (children versus employer) | −0.271*** | 2.487 | −0.230*** | 2.712 | ||
| Hospital treatment charge (social security versus family support) | −0.180** | 5.709 | −0.157** | 6.430 | ||
| Social participation |
|
| ||||
| Age | 0.264*** | 0.088 | 0.173** | 0.092 | ||
| Barthel index | 0.382*** | 0.082 | 0.350*** | 0.096 | ||
| Modified Rankin scale | −0.305*** | 1.657 | −0.234** | 1.791 | ||
| Hospital treatment charge (Self-support versus family support) | 0.245*** | 2.507 | 0.159** | 2.492 | ||
Level of significance of P value: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***P < 0.001.