Literature DB >> 8418798

The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research.

K J Ottenbacher1, S Jannell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: There are currently 1.5 million stroke survivors in the United States. More than half of these individuals have significant residual physical disability and functional impairment. Survivors of stroke constitute the largest group of patients receiving rehabilitation services in this country. We examined existing clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation programs to improve functional outcomes and discharge destination. One hundred twenty-four research reports were initially identified. From this sample, 36 trials meeting selected criteria were evaluated by the methods of meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 3717 patients participated in the 36 clinical trials included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed a mean d-index of 0.40 +/- 0.33. This effect size index was converted to a U3 value of 65.5, indicating that the average patient receiving a program of focused stroke rehabilitation performed better than approximately 65.5% of those patients in comparison groups (95% confidence interval, 63.6% to 67.3%). The results also revealed a significant interaction between type of research design and method of recording the outcome of a clinical trial. Blind recording of the outcome measure appears to be an essential design characteristic in clinical trials that do not randomize patients to conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Programs of focused stroke rehabilitation may improve functional performance for some patients who have experienced a stroke. The improvement in performance appears related to early initiation of treatment, but not to the duration of intervention. Improvements are also associated with the patient's age and the type of design. Research design should be considered an important moderator variable in planning and interpreting future clinical trials of treatment effectiveness in stroke rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8418798     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540010033014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  34 in total

Review 1.  Services for people with stroke.

Authors:  D T Wade
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

Review 2.  [Early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation. Current state].

Authors:  M Bertram; T Brandt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Organization of stroke rehabilitation services.

Authors:  L Provinciali; M Bartolini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-10

4.  Specialist rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  J Gladman; D Barer; P Langhorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-29

5.  Importance and Difficulties of Pursuing rTMS Research in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  James R Carey; Diane M Chappuis; Marsha J Finkelstein; Kate L Frost; Lynette K Leuty; Allison L McNulty; Lars I E Oddsson; Erin M Seifert; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 6.  Activity-based therapies.

Authors:  Alexander W Dromerick; Peter S Lum; Joseph Hidler
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

7.  Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.

Authors:  Robert W Regenhardt; Hajime Takase; Eng H Lo; David J Lin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Can hospitalization be hazardous to your health? A nosocomial based stress model for hospitalization.

Authors:  Bernard P Chang
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 9.  Future role of neurologists.

Authors:  J W Engstrom; S L Hauser
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-09

Review 10.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.