Literature DB >> 24980586

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis.

Daniel K Resnick1, William C Watters, Alok Sharan, Praveen V Mummaneni, Andrew T Dailey, Jeffrey C Wang, Tanvir F Choudhri, Jason Eck, Zoher Ghogawala, Michael W Groff, Sanjay S Dhall, Michael G Kaiser.   

Abstract

Patients presenting with stenosis associated with a spondylolisthesis will often describe signs and symptoms consistent with neurogenic claudication, radiculopathy, and/or low-back pain. The primary objective of surgery, when deemed appropriate, is to decompress the neural elements. As a result of the decompression, the inherent instability associated with the spondylolisthesis may progress and lead to further misalignment that results in pain or recurrence of neurological complaints. Under these circumstances, lumbar fusion is considered appropriate to stabilize the spine and prevent delayed deterioration. Since publication of the original guidelines there have been a significant number of studies published that continue to support the utility of lumbar fusion for patients presenting with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Several recently published trials, including the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, are among the largest prospective randomized investigations of this issue. Despite limitations of study design or execution, these trials have consistently demonstrated superior outcomes when patients undergo surgery, with the majority undergoing some type of lumbar fusion procedure. There is insufficient evidence, however, to recommend a standard approach to achieve a solid arthrodesis. When formulating the most appropriate surgical strategy, it is recommended that an individualized approach be adopted, one that takes into consideration the patient's unique anatomical constraints and desires, as well as surgeon's experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PLF = posterolateral lumbar fusion; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; SPORT = Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; VAS = visual analog scale; fusion; lumbar spine; practice guidelines; spondylolisthesis; stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980586     DOI: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  38 in total

1.  Use of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  Instrumented Spinal Stabilization without Fusion for Spinal Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Dori Drakhshandeh; James A Miller; Andrew J Fabiano
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Decompression versus decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis: analysis of the factors influencing the outcome of back pain and disability.

Authors:  Pasquale Donnarumma; Roberto Tarantino; Lorenzo Nigro; Marika Rullo; Domenico Messina; Daniele Diacinti; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

5.  Point of view: a randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis-lessons learnt and practical considerations.

Authors:  Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

6.  Efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Li; Lin-Yu Jin; Zhen-Dong Lv; Xin-Jin Su; Kun Wang; Hong-Xing Shen; Xiao-Xing Song
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?

Authors:  Tim Finkenstaedt; Filippo Del Grande; Nicolae Bolog; Nils H Ulrich; Sina Tok; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer; Christine B Chung; Gustav Andreisek; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ivar M Austevoll; Rolf Gjestad; Jens Ivar Brox; Tore K Solberg; Kjersti Storheim; Frode Rekeland; Erland Hermansen; Kari Indrekvam; Christian Hellum
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2018: dynamic imaging of degenerative spondylolisthesis reveals mid-range dynamic lumbar instability not evident on static clinical radiographs.

Authors:  Malcolm E Dombrowski; Bryan Rynearson; Clarissa LeVasseur; Zach Adgate; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; Ameet Aiyangar; William J Anderst
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Alison Rushton; Martin L Verra; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom; J Bart Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.