OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to retrospectively determine the potential of virtual monoenergetic (ME) reconstructions for a reduction of metal artifacts using a new-generation single-source computed tomographic (CT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ethics committee of our institution approved this retrospective study with a waiver of the need for informed consent. A total of 50 consecutive patients (29 men and 21 women; mean [SD] age, 51.3 [16.7] years) with metal implants after osteosynthetic fracture treatment who had been examined using a single-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany; consecutive dual-energy mode with 140 kV/80 kV) were selected. Using commercially available postprocessing software (syngo Dual Energy; Siemens AG), virtual ME data sets with extrapolated energy of 130 keV were generated (medium smooth convolution kernel D30) and compared with standard polyenergetic images reconstructed with a B30 (medium smooth) and a B70 (sharp) kernel. For quantification of the beam hardening artifacts, CT values were measured on circular lines surrounding bone and the osteosynthetic device, and frequency analyses of these values were performed using discrete Fourier transform. A high proportion of low frequencies to the spectrum indicates a high level of metal artifacts. The measurements in all data sets were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The virtual ME images with extrapolated energy of 130 keV showed significantly lower contribution of low frequencies after the Fourier transform compared with any polyenergetic data set reconstructed with D30, B70, and B30 kernels (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential single-source dual-energy CT allows an efficient reduction of metal artifacts using high-energy ME extrapolation after osteosynthetic fracture treatment.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to retrospectively determine the potential of virtual monoenergetic (ME) reconstructions for a reduction of metal artifacts using a new-generation single-source computed tomographic (CT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ethics committee of our institution approved this retrospective study with a waiver of the need for informed consent. A total of 50 consecutive patients (29 men and 21 women; mean [SD] age, 51.3 [16.7] years) with metal implants after osteosynthetic fracture treatment who had been examined using a single-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany; consecutive dual-energy mode with 140 kV/80 kV) were selected. Using commercially available postprocessing software (syngo Dual Energy; Siemens AG), virtual ME data sets with extrapolated energy of 130 keV were generated (medium smooth convolution kernel D30) and compared with standard polyenergetic images reconstructed with a B30 (medium smooth) and a B70 (sharp) kernel. For quantification of the beam hardening artifacts, CT values were measured on circular lines surrounding bone and the osteosynthetic device, and frequency analyses of these values were performed using discrete Fourier transform. A high proportion of low frequencies to the spectrum indicates a high level of metal artifacts. The measurements in all data sets were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The virtual ME images with extrapolated energy of 130 keV showed significantly lower contribution of low frequencies after the Fourier transform compared with any polyenergetic data set reconstructed with D30, B70, and B30 kernels (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential single-source dual-energy CT allows an efficient reduction of metal artifacts using high-energy ME extrapolation after osteosynthetic fracture treatment.
Authors: Wei Zhou; David J Bartlett; Felix E Diehn; Katrina N Glazebrook; Amy L Kotsenas; Rickey E Carter; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Nils Große Hokamp; V Neuhaus; N Abdullayev; K Laukamp; S Lennartz; A Mpotsaris; J Borggrefe Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Kai Roman Laukamp; Simon Lennartz; Victor-Frederic Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Robert Rau; Markus Le Blanc; Nuran Abdullayev; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nils Große Hokamp; Brendan Eck; Florian Siedek; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jasmin A Holz; David Maintz; Stefan Haneder Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2020-05
Authors: Kai Roman Laukamp; David Zopfs; Simon Lennartz; Lenhard Pennig; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe; Nils Große Hokamp Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: En-Haw Wu; So Yeon Kim; Z Jane Wang; Wei-Chou Chang; Li-Qin Zhao; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Amit Gupta; Verena Carola Obmann; Michelle Jordan; Simon Lennartz; Markus Michael Obmann; Nils Große Hokamp; David Zopfs; Lenhard Pennig; Gina Fürtjes; Nikhil Ramaiya; Robert Gilkeson; Kai Roman Laukamp Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-01