OBJECTIVE: Routine monitoring of plasma HIV RNA among HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is unavailable in many resource-limited settings. Alternative monitoring approaches correlate poorly with virologic failure and can substantially delay switch to second-line therapy. We evaluated the impact of delayed switch on mortality among patients with virologic failure in Africa. DESIGN: A cohort. METHODS: We examined patients with confirmed virologic failure on first-line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens from four cohorts with serial HIV RNA monitoring in Uganda and South Africa. Marginal structural models aimed to estimate the effect of delayed switch on mortality in a hypothetical trial in which switch time was randomly assigned. Inverse probability weights adjusted for measured confounders including time-updated CD4+ T-cell count and HIV RNA. Results: Among 823 patients with confirmed virologic failure, the cumulative incidence of switch 180 days after failure was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-33]. The majority of patients (74%) had not failed immunologically as defined by WHO criteria by the time of virologic failure. Adjusted mortality was higher for individuals who remained on first-line therapy than for those who had switched [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2]. Among those without immunologic failure, the relative harm of failure to switch was similar (OR 2.4; 95% CI 0.99-5.8) to that of the entire cohort, although of borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among HIV-infected patients with confirmed virologic failure on first-line ART, remaining on first-line therapy led to an increase in mortality relative to switching. Our results suggest that detection and response to confirmed virologic failure could decrease mortality.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Routine monitoring of plasma HIV RNA among HIV-infectedpatients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is unavailable in many resource-limited settings. Alternative monitoring approaches correlate poorly with virologic failure and can substantially delay switch to second-line therapy. We evaluated the impact of delayed switch on mortality among patients with virologic failure in Africa. DESIGN: A cohort. METHODS: We examined patients with confirmed virologic failure on first-line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens from four cohorts with serial HIV RNA monitoring in Uganda and South Africa. Marginal structural models aimed to estimate the effect of delayed switch on mortality in a hypothetical trial in which switch time was randomly assigned. Inverse probability weights adjusted for measured confounders including time-updated CD4+ T-cell count and HIV RNA. Results: Among 823 patients with confirmed virologic failure, the cumulative incidence of switch 180 days after failure was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI) 27-33]. The majority of patients (74%) had not failed immunologically as defined by WHO criteria by the time of virologic failure. Adjusted mortality was higher for individuals who remained on first-line therapy than for those who had switched [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2]. Among those without immunologic failure, the relative harm of failure to switch was similar (OR 2.4; 95% CI 0.99-5.8) to that of the entire cohort, although of borderline statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Among HIV-infectedpatients with confirmed virologic failure on first-line ART, remaining on first-line therapy led to an increase in mortality relative to switching. Our results suggest that detection and response to confirmed virologic failure could decrease mortality.
Authors: Diane V Havlir; Kersten K Koelsch; Matthew C Strain; Nicolas Margot; Biao Lu; Caroline C Ignacio; Michael D Miller; Joseph K Wong Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Olivia Keiser; Patrick MacPhail; Andrew Boulle; Robin Wood; Mauro Schechter; François Dabis; Eduardo Sprinz; Matthias Egger Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Andrew N Phillips; Deenan Pillay; Alec H Miners; Diane E Bennett; Charles F Gilks; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew P Fox; Gilles Van Cutsem; Janet Giddy; Mhairi Maskew; Olivia Keiser; Hans Prozesky; Robin Wood; Miguel A Hernán; Jonathan A C Sterne; Matthias Egger; Andrew Boulle Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jonathan Mermin; John P Ekwaru; Willy Were; Richard Degerman; Rebecca Bunnell; Frank Kaharuza; Robert Downing; Alex Coutinho; Peter Solberg; Lorraine N Alexander; Jordan Tappero; James Campbell; David M Moore Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-11-09
Authors: Linh Tran; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Beverly S Musick; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Abraham Siika; Sylvester Kimaiyo; Mark J van der Laan; Maya Petersen Journal: Epidemiol Methods Date: 2016-11-10
Authors: Rimke Bijker; Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Sanjay Pujari; Ly P Sun; Oon T Ng; Man P Lee; Jun Y Choi; Kinh V Nguyen; Yu J Chan; Tuti P Merati; Do D Cuong; Jeremy Ross; Awachana Jiamsakul Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2020
Authors: Mary Morrow; Samantha MaWhinney; Ryan P Coyle; Stacey S Coleman; Edward M Gardner; Jia-Hua Zheng; Lucas Ellison; Lane R Bushman; Jennifer J Kiser; Peter L Anderson; Jose R Castillo-Mancilla Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Alyssa F Harlow; Jacob Bor; Alana T Brennan; Mhairi Maskew; William MacLeod; Sergio Carmona; Koleka Mlisana; Matthew P Fox Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Eric N Ouattara; Marion Robine; Serge P Eholié; Rachel L MacLean; Raoul Moh; Elena Losina; Delphine Gabillard; A David Paltiel; Christine Danel; Rochelle P Walensky; Xavier Anglaret; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 9.079