Literature DB >> 2497723

Characterization of the larval olfactory response in Drosophila and its genetic basis.

P Monte, C Woodard, R Ayer, M Lilly, H Sun, J Carlson.   

Abstract

Drosophila larvae are attracted to a wide variety of chemical stimuli. The olfactory response to ethyl acetate, a powerful attractant, was found to be surprisingly well conserved across a variety of different wild-type strains. Strain differences are documented, however, both in attraction to ethyl acetate and in another chemosensory behavior: avoidance of an aversive stimulus. As a means of analyzing the extent of genetic heterogeneity within strains, one wild-type population, Canton-S, was screened for variant X chromosomes. An enrichment procedure was characterized and used to make the screening more efficient. Lines homozygous for individual X chromosomes were established, and all were found to exhibit a strong olfactory response, although evidence was found for variation among them. The olfactory response was found to be conserved through an extended period of larval development, including the final period during which larvae leave the culture medium in preparation for metamorphosis. The results are discussed in terms of the genetic basis of the response and the use of single-gene mutations as a means of dissecting olfactory system function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2497723     DOI: 10.1007/bf01065910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  11 in total

1.  Developmental analysis of two mutations affecting chemotactic behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Tompkins
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  BEHAVIORAL MUTANTS OF Drosophila ISOLATED BY COUNTERCURRENT DISTRIBUTION.

Authors:  S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genotypic differences in larval olfactory discrimination in two Drosophila melanogaster strains.

Authors:  A Pruzan; G Bush
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 4.  A few chemical words exchanged by Drosophila during courtship and mating.

Authors:  J M Jallon
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 5.  Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila.

Authors:  L Tompkins
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses in Drosophila. II. An odorant-specific variant in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Fuyama
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Larval reaction to alcohol as an indicator of resource utilization differences between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses in Drosophila. I. Olfactometry and strain differences in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Fuyama
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W G Quinn; W A Harris; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Learning in normal and mutant Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  E O Aceves-Piña; W G Quinn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  39 in total

1.  Smell and taste perception in Drosophila melanogaster larva: toxin expression studies in chemosensory neurons.

Authors:  G Heimbeck; V Bugnon; N Gendre; C Häberlin; R F Stocker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interstrain variability of larval photokinesis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Gordesky-Gold; J M Warrick; D P Kutzler; K C Neal; C M Coughlin; L Tompkins
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.805

3.  Flies dynamically anti-track, rather than ballistically escape, aversive odor during flight.

Authors:  Sara Wasserman; Patrick Lu; Jacob W Aptekar; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  Drosophila Chemoreceptors: A Molecular Interface Between the Chemical World and the Brain.

Authors:  Ryan M Joseph; John R Carlson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Similar odorants elicit different behavioral and physiological responses, some supersustained.

Authors:  Shelby A Montague; Dennis Mathew; John R Carlson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A simple chemosensory response in Drosophila and the isolation of acj mutants in which it is affected.

Authors:  M McKenna; P Monte; S L Helfand; C Woodard; J Carlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inhibition of insect olfactory behavior by an airborne antagonist of the insect odorant receptor co-receptor subunit.

Authors:  Devin Kepchia; Scott Moliver; Kunal Chohan; Cameron Phillips; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of gut microbes on olfactory behavior of Drosophila melanogaster larva.

Authors:  Eryn Slankster; Cammie Lee; Kristen M Hess; Seth Odell; Dennis Mathew
Journal:  Bios       Date:  2019-12-09

9.  Mechanisms of odor-tracking: multiple sensors for enhanced perception and behavior.

Authors:  Alex Gomez-Marin; Brian J Duistermars; Mark A Frye; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  The different effects of structurally related sulfakinins on Drosophila melanogaster odor preference and locomotion suggest involvement of distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Ruthann Nichols; Jonathan P Egle; Nicholas R Langan; Gregory C Palmer
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.