Literature DB >> 24977004

Evaluating the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of breast cancer: are tumor biomarkers and dynamic contrast enhanced MR images useful predictive tools?

Zijing Zhang1, Wei Zhang1, Yiting Jin1, Hongying Wang1, Fei Gu1, Jian Zhou1, Zhengyin Lao1, Zude Xu1, Feng Tang1, Liping Zou1, Weijun Tang1, Rong Lu1, Qiang Zou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In order to evaluate the therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, this research focused on the changes in expression of tumor biomarkers and the correlations associated with changes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pre- and post-NAC. We also compared the accuracy of MRI and pathology in terms of residual tumor extent after NAC.
METHODS: MRI was performed before and after four courses of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and paclitaxel (CET) NAC on 114 patients treated in Huashan Hospital (Fudan University) from December 2009 to January 2013. All patients were pathologically diagnosed with invasive breast cancer via core needle biopsy. A series of tumor biomarkers, including P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Ki-67, was tested by immunohistochemistry in both core needle biopsy and surgical specimens. The changes in tumor biomarker expression and the shrinkage of tumor on MRI were observed. The residual tumor extent after NAC was compared in terms of MRI and histopathology, and the accuracy of MRI was evaluated by both residual tumor extent and by NAC therapeutic effect. Together, these methods enabled a prognostic estimate of NAC.
RESULTS: The P-gp expression before NAC was used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of NAC. The up-regulation of P-gp expression after NAC was associated with poor therapeutic effect (P=0.0011). The expression of Ki-67 was significantly down-regulated (P<0.0001) but it had no association with NAC response (P=0.9645). The mean extent of residual tumor after NAC as seen on MRI was 20.83 mm (±4.14 mm, 95% CI) and that of surgically removed specimens, 18.89 mm (±3.71 mm, 95% CI). The sensitivity of MRI was 95.1%, the specificity was 28.6%, the positive predictive value was 79.6%, and the negative predictive value was 66.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: P-gp status was an important factor affecting the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. The change in P-gp expression, from negative to positive following NAC treatment, indicated the emergence of drug resistance resulting from chemotherapy. The down-regulation of Ki-67 was associated with the decline of tumor proliferation. However, compared to the pre-NAC P-gp status, the pre-NAC Ki-67 status had little prognostic value. Additionally, the evaluation of the efficacy of NAC by either MRI or histopathology was inconclusive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Ki-67; P-glycoprotein (P-gp); neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); pathological complete response (pCR)

Year:  2014        PMID: 24977004      PMCID: PMC4073369          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  32 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical Detection of P-glycoprotein in Breast Cancer and Its Significance as a Prognostic Factor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1997-12-25       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Ki-67, p53, ER receptors, ploidy and S phase as long-term prognostic factors in T1 node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Mikael Railo; Johan Lundin; Caj Haglund; Karl von Smitten; Stig Nordling
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2006-12-01

3.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Sean E McGuire; Thomas A Buchholz; Susan L Tucker; Henry M Kuerer; Roman Rouzier; Shu-Wan Kau; Eugene H Huang; Paolo Morandi; Alberto Ocana; Massimo Cristofanilli; Vicente Valero; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Relationship between the thymidine labeling and Ki-67 proliferative indices in 126 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Annamaria Molino; Rebecca Pedersini; Rocco Micciolo; Michela Frisinghelli; Monica Giovannini; Michele Pavarana; Rolando Nortilli; Antonio Santo; Pietro Manno; Martina Padovani; Quirino Piubello; Gian Luigi Cetto
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2002-12

6.  Age and HER2 expression status affect MRI accuracy in predicting residual tumor extent after neo-adjuvant systemic treatment.

Authors:  H-G Moon; W Han; J W Lee; E Ko; E-K Kim; J-H Yu; S Y Kang; W K Moon; N Cho; I-A Park; D-Y Oh; S-W Han; S-A Im; D-Y Noh
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  RNA expression of breast cancer resistance protein, lung resistance-related protein, multidrug resistance-associated proteins 1 and 2, and multidrug resistance gene 1 in breast cancer: correlation with chemotherapeutic response.

Authors:  Herman Burger; John A Foekens; Maxime P Look; Marion E Meijer-van Gelder; Jan G M Klijn; Erik A C Wiemer; Gerrit Stoter; Kees Nooter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Expression of MRP1, LRP and Pgp in breast carcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Margaretha Rudas; Martin Filipits; Susanne Taucher; Thomas Stranzl; Günther G Steger; Raimund Jakesz; Robert Pirker; Gudrun Pohl
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Incidence of pathologic complete response in women treated with preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: correlation of histology, hormone receptor status, Her2/Neu, and gross pathologic findings.

Authors:  Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Georgia Alderete-Vázquez; Marissa Quintal-Ramírez; Marcia Patiño; Erika Ruíz
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.090

10.  A Phase II Study of Concurrent Docetaxel, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide as a Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xin Yao; Janet Hosenpud; Christopher R Chitambar; John Charlson; Yee Chung Cheng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Weilin Xu; Xiu Chen; Fei Deng; Jian Zhang; Wei Zhang; Jinhai Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Higher underestimation of tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-A concordance comparison cohort analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Pei Wu; Hwa-Koon Wu; Chih-Jung Chen; Chih-Wie Lee; Shou-Tung Chen; Dar-Ren Chen; Chen-Te Chou; Chi Wei Mok; Hung-Wen Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Role of ABCB1 in mediating chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Yomna S Abd El-Aziz; Andrew J Spillane; Patric J Jansson; Sumit Sahni
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.