Literature DB >> 16192593

Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo1, Sean E McGuire, Thomas A Buchholz, Susan L Tucker, Henry M Kuerer, Roman Rouzier, Shu-Wan Kau, Eugene H Huang, Paolo Morandi, Alberto Ocana, Massimo Cristofanilli, Vicente Valero, Aman U Buzdar, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify clinicopathological factors predictive of distant metastasis in patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC).
METHODS: Retrospective review of 226 patients at our institution identified as having a pCR was performed. Clinical stage at diagnosis was I (2%), II (36%), IIIA (27%), IIIB (23%), and IIIC (12%). Eleven percent of all patients were inflammatory breast cancers (IBC). Ninety-five percent received anthracycline-based chemotherapy; 42% also received taxane-based therapy. The relationship of distant metastasis with clinicopathologic factors was evaluated, and Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of development of distant metastasis.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 63 months. There were 31 distant metastases. Ten-year distant metastasis-free rate was 82%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis using combined stage revealed that clinical stages IIIB, IIIC, and IBC (hazard ratio [HR], 4.24; 95% CI, 1.96 to 9.18; P < .0001), identification of < or = 10 lymph nodes (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.15; P = .004), and premenopausal status (HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.25 to 7.59; P = .015) predicted for distant metastasis. Freedom from distant metastasis at 10 years was 97% for no factors, 88% for one factor, 77% for two factors, and 31% for three factors (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: A small percentage of breast cancer patients with pCR experience recurrence. We identified factors that independently predicted for distant metastasis development. Our data suggest that premenopausal patients with advanced local disease and suboptimal axillary node evaluation may be candidates for clinical trials to determine whether more aggressive or investigational adjuvant therapy will be of benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16192593     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Martin Lepage; Anuradha Chakravarthy; Elizabeth E Broome; Kenneth J Niermann; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid Meszoely; Ingrid A Mayer; Cheryl R Herman; Kevin McManus; Ronald R Price; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Pathological complete response in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: The natural history of an elusive prognosticator.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Iheoma Nwaogu; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 3.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Prognostic significance of the ratio of absolute neutrophil to lymphocyte counts for breast cancer patients with ER/PR-positivity and HER2-negativity in neoadjuvant setting.

Authors:  Young Wha Koh; Hee Jin Lee; Jin-Hee Ahn; Jong Won Lee; Gyungyub Gong
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-02

5.  Patient and tumor characteristics associated with breast cancer recurrence after complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Na Rae Ju; Donna B Jeffe; Jason Keune; Rebecca Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer judged by PERCIST - multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koya Nakatani; Kazushige Yamaguchi; Masatoyo Nakajo; Atsushi Tani; Mana Ishibashi; Keiko Hosoya; Takahiro Morita; Takayuki Kinoshita; Hayato Kaida; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; Oscar Arrieta; Carlos Gamboa-Vignolle; David Saavedra-Perez; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Juan Zinser-Sierra; Victor Perez-Sanchez; Teresa Ramirez-Ugalde; Fernando Lara-Medina
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Predictors of recurrence in breast cancer patients with a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Tanioka; C Shimizu; K Yonemori; K Yoshimura; K Tamura; T Kouno; M Ando; N Katsumata; H Tsuda; T Kinoshita; Y Fujiwara
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Identification of biology-based breast cancer types with distinct predictive and prognostic features: role of steroid hormone and HER2 receptor expression in patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Sibylle Loibl; Berit M Müller; Marc Roller; Carsten Denkert; Martina Komor; Karsten Schlüns; Jens Uwe Blohmer; Jan Budczies; Bernd Gerber; Aurelia Noske; Andreas du Bois; Wilko Weichert; Christian Jackisch; Manfred Dietel; Klaus Richter; Manfred Kaufmann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.