| Literature DB >> 24976860 |
Jenny Jeehan Nasr1, Shereen Shalan1, Fathalla Belal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tylosin and Josamycin are macrolide antibiotics. They are used in the treatment of pneumonia, arthritis and mastitis in cattle, and mycoplasma infections in poultry. The incorrect use of antibiotics has lead to the presence of antibiotic residues in foods. The residues cause toxic effects on consumers.Entities:
Keywords: Chicken muscles; Eggs; Josamycin; Micellar liquid chromatography; Monolithic column; Tylosin
Year: 2014 PMID: 24976860 PMCID: PMC4069345 DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Cent J ISSN: 1752-153X Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Chemical structures of the drugs investigated.
Figure 2Chromatogram showing: (a) 100 μg mLTS, (b) 250 μg mLJM in: (A) TS and JM standards. (B) Baby Formula milk.
Optimization of experimental factors affecting the chromatographic performance of the proposed method
| Organic modifier nature | |||||
| Methanol | 7566 | 12598 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 11.10 |
| 1-Propanol | 5974 | 12154 | 1.16 | 0.20 | 16.40 |
| Acetonitrile | 4253 | 9098 | 1.10 | 0.10 | 14.10 |
| Methanol concentration (%) | |||||
| 8 | 3791 | 9496 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 9.97 |
| 10 | 5566 | 11598 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 11.10 |
| 12 | 4770 | 10204 | 1.17 | 1.24 | 11.42 |
| 14 | 7312 | 12723 | 1.09 | 1.10 | 11.16 |
| 16 | 4549 | 9675 | 1.21 | 1.31 | 11.80 |
| SDS concentration (M) | |||||
| 0.10 | 4317 | 8931 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 12.72 |
| 0.12 | 5800 | 9848 | 1.20 | 1.28 | 12.07 |
| 0.15 | 5312 | 10723 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 11.67 |
| 0.17 | 7516 | 12973 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 10.81 |
| 0.20 | 3429 | 10814 | 1.19 | 1.05 | 10.76 |
| pH | |||||
| 2.5 | 4247 | 9564 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 12.83 |
| 3.0 | 5985 | 10611 | 1.17 | 1.23 | 12.89 |
| 4.0 | 7516 | 12973 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 10.84 |
| 5.0 | 4830 | 11349 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 11.80 |
Statistical analysis of the results obtained by the proposed and reference methods for pure samples of tylosin and josamycin
| % Recovery | 90.4 | 97.5 | 104.3 | 98.7 |
| | 100.5 | 103.2 | 99.7 | 101.7 |
| | 99.0 | 98.8 | 100.8 | 99.3 |
| | 99.5 | | 100.1 | |
| | 100.6 | | 99.8 | |
| | 99.8 | | 100.2 | |
| | 99.9 | | 99.2 | |
| | 99.9 | | 99.9 | |
| Mean | 98. 7 | 99.8 | 100.5 | 99.9 |
| ± S.D. | 3.4 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Variance | 11.5 | 8.9 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Students | 0.62 | 0.61 | ||
| Variance ratio | 1.37 | 1.04 | ||
aTabulated t- and F-values at p = 0.05 are: 2.26 and 4.74, respectively.
Accuracy and precision data for tylosin and josamycin using the proposed method
| Tylosin | 50.0 | 99.8 ± 0.2 | 0.1 | 99.1 ± 0.6 | 0.4 |
| | 100.0 | 99.5 ± 0.6 | 0.4 | 100.2 ± 0.4 | 0.2 |
| | 150.0 | 99.6 ± 0.6 | 0.3 | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Josamycin | 50.0 | 100.8 ± 0.3 | 0.2 | 100.3 ± 0.3 | 0.2 |
| | 125.0 | 99.6 ± 0.5 | 0.3 | 100.9 ± 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 250.0 | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 0.3 | 99.6 ± 0.6 | 0.4 | |
N.B. Each result is the average of three separate determinations.
aIntra-day: within the day.
bInter-day: three consecutive days.
Assay of tylosin and josamycin in food samples using the proposed and reference methods
| Sample type | Chicken muscle | Chicken liver | ||||||
| Mean recovery | 101.10 | 100.62 | 101.13 | 100.86 | 101.93 | 99.13 | 99.97 | 98.47 |
| ± S.D. | 0.72 | 0.82 | 2.71 | 2.17 | 2.01 | 2.29 | 3.16 | 2.84 |
| Variance | 0.52 | 0.67 | 7.34 | 4.7 | 4.04 | 5.24 | 9.96 | 8.04 |
| Students | 0.79 | 0.13 | 1.59 | 0.61 | ||||
| Variance ratio | 1.29 | 1.55 | 1.30 | 1.24 | ||||
| Sample type | Bovine muscle | Bovine liver | ||||||
| Mean recovery | 102.60 | 100.53 | 97.80 | 96.87 | 99.43 | 97.53 | 98.40 | 98.20 |
| ± S.D. | 1.05 | 2.63 | 1.57 | 0.70 | 2.49 | 1.30 | 1.65 | 2.36 |
| Variance | 1.11 | 6.94 | 2.47 | 0.49 | 6.20 | 1.69 | 2.71 | 5.56 |
| Students | 1.26 | 0.94 | 1.17 | 0.12 | ||||
| Variance ratio | 6.25 | 5.01 | 3.66 | 2.05 | ||||
| Sample type | Milk | Eggs | ||||||
| Mean recovery | 99.53 | 98.87 | 99.40 | 98.93 | 100.93 | 100.60 | 100.80 | 100.70 |
| ± S.D. | 2.35 | 2.81 | 2.61 | 2.58 | 3.02 | 2.43 | 2.72 | 1.87 |
| Variance | 5.52 | 7.89 | 6.84 | 6.65 | 9.14 | 5.92 | 7.41 | 3.51 |
| Students | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.05 | ||||
| Variance ratio | 1.43 | 1.03 | 1.54 | 2.11 | ||||
| Sample type | Baby food | Baby formulae | ||||||
| Mean recovery | 100.03 | 99.70 | 99.67 | 98.03 | 98.00 | 97.03 | 98.80 | 97.37 |
| ± S.D. | 2.51 | 1.90 | 3.07 | 1.98 | 2.85 | 1.91 | 1.35 | 1.80 |
| Variance | 6.30 | 3.61 | 9.40 | 3.94 | 8.13 | 3.64 | 1.83 | 3.24 |
| Students | 0.18 | 0.77 | 0.49 | 1.10 | ||||
| Variance ratio | 1.75 | 2.38 | 2.23 | 1.77 | ||||
aNumber of experiments = 3.
bTabulated t- and F-values at p = 0.05 are: 2.78 and 19.00, respectively.
Figure 3Chromatograms showing: (a) 50 μg mLTS, (b) 125 μg mLJM in: (A) Chicken liver. (B) Eggs. (C) Milk.