Literature DB >> 24976794

Evaluating Safety Initiatives in Healthcare.

Asad Latif1, Christine G Holzmueller2, Peter J Pronovost3.   

Abstract

Substantial attention over the last decade has focused on ensuring improvement in the increasingly complex world of healthcare. This has resulted in significant efforts in the arena of patient safety. The issue of how best to evaluate the validity of patient safety initiatives is a matter of significant discussion. Many quality improvement initiatives in healthcare are poorly developed, with few patient safety interventions sharing characteristics with evidence based medicine. We will discuss the key elements of a framework as an example to help structure our thinking and approach to answer these questions. Elements include an explanation of the theoretical basis, the use of appropriate measures, detailing of the involved processes, assessment of the initiative itself as well as the contextual factors surrounding it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality improvement; best practices; evaluation; framework; improvement science; monitoring; patient safety

Year:  2014        PMID: 24976794      PMCID: PMC4070516          DOI: 10.1007/s40140-014-0059-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3855


  38 in total

1.  What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety.

Authors:  Lucian L Leape; Donald M Berwick; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 Jul 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  General attributes of safe organisations.

Authors:  P R Schulman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

3.  A framework for health care organizations to develop and evaluate a safety scorecard.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Sean M Berenholtz; Dale M Needham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Heterogeneity is not always noise: lessons from improvement.

Authors:  Frank Davidoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Charles L Bosk; Emma Louise Aveling; Christine A Goeschel; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Promotion of improvement as a science.

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Peter Pronovost; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.

Authors:  Christopher P Landrigan; Gareth J Parry; Catherine B Bones; Andrew D Hackbarth; Donald A Goldmann; Paul J Sharek
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Yongfei Wang; Barbara A Barton; Tashonna R Webster; Jennifer A Mattera; Sarah A Roumanis; Jeptha P Curtis; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; David J Magid; Robert L McNamara; Janet Parkosewich; Jerod M Loeb; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Effect of work-hours regulations on intensive care unit mortality in United States teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Meeta Prasad; Theodore J Iwashyna; Jason D Christie; Andrew A Kramer; Jeffrey H Silber; Kevin G Volpp; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.