Susan Carnell1, Leora Benson, Elissa Driggin, Laura Kolbe. 1. Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits. METHOD: Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights. RESULTS: Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p < .001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p < .001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p < .001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score. DISCUSSION: Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.
OBJECTIVE: Eating behavior traits measured in early life predict eating behavior and weight trajectories later in development, and may be associated with certain parental feeding behaviors. Our goal was to investigate the relationship between a range of feeding behaviors, and preschoolers' appetitive traits. METHOD: Four hundred thirty-nine parents of UK 3-5 year olds completed scales measuring authoritarian vs. authoritative forms of limiting (Restriction vs. Monitoring) and promoting (Pressuring vs. Prompting) intake, as well as Emotional and Instrumental Feeding. Parents also completed scales measuring child Food responsiveness and Satiety responsiveness. Child BMI z-scores were calculated based on measured heights and weights. RESULTS: Parental Restriction was significantly associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p < .001), but parental Monitoring was not. Parental Pressuring was significantly associated with greater child Satiety responsiveness (p < .001), while parental Prompting was not. Parental Instrumental and Emotional feeding were both associated with greater child Food responsiveness (p < .001). All relationships were independent of child BMI z-score. DISCUSSION: Prospective data are needed to determine whether the parent-child feeding relationships identified here promote, or protect against, the development of eating pathology in children. However, our results suggest that cross-sectional associations depend on the style (e.g., authoritarian vs. authoritative), as well as the type of feeding behavior measured.
Authors: L R Lilenfeld; W H Kaye; C G Greeno; K R Merikangas; K Plotnicov; C Pollice; R Rao; M Strober; C M Bulik; L Nagy Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1998-07
Authors: Rachel F Rodgers; Susan J Paxton; Robin Massey; Karen J Campbell; Eleanor H Wertheim; Helen Skouteris; Kay Gibbons Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Amber E Vaughn; Dianne S Ward; Jennifer O Fisher; Myles S Faith; Sheryl O Hughes; Stef P J Kremers; Dara R Musher-Eizenman; Teresia M O'Connor; Heather Patrick; Thomas G Power Journal: Nutr Rev Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 7.110
Authors: Ariel A Jordan; Danielle P Appugliese; Alison L Miller; Julie C Lumeng; Katherine L Rosenblum; Megan H Pesch Journal: Appetite Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Megan H Pesch; Kristoffer S Berlin; Robert J Cesaro; Tiffany M Rybak; Alison L Miller; Katherine L Rosenblum; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Appetite Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.868