Literature DB >> 24975229

Disentangling the neural mechanisms involved in Hinduism- and Buddhism-related meditations.

Barbara Tomasino1, Alberto Chiesa2, Franco Fabbro3.   

Abstract

The most diffuse forms of meditation derive from Hinduism and Buddhism spiritual traditions. Different cognitive processes are set in place to reach these meditation states. According to an historical-philological hypothesis (Wynne, 2009) the two forms of meditation could be disentangled. While mindfulness is the focus of Buddhist meditation reached by focusing sustained attention on the body, on breathing and on the content of the thoughts, reaching an ineffable state of nothigness accompanied by a loss of sense of self and duality (Samadhi) is the main focus of Hinduism-inspired meditation. It is possible that these different practices activate separate brain networks. We tested this hypothesis by conducting an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. The network related to Buddhism-inspired meditation (16 experiments, 263 subjects, and 96 activation foci) included activations in some frontal lobe structures associated with executive attention, possibly confirming the fundamental role of mindfulness shared by many Buddhist meditations. By contrast, the network related to Hinduism-inspired meditation (8 experiments, 54 activation foci and 66 subjects) triggered a left lateralized network of areas including the postcentral gyrus, the superior parietal lobe, the hippocampus and the right middle cingulate cortex. The dissociation between anterior and posterior networks support the notion that different meditation styles and traditions are characterized by different patterns of neural activation.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Keywords:  Default system; Executive attention; Meditation; Mindfulness; Superior medial gyrus; Yoga

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24975229     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  27 in total

1.  Understanding sleep facilitators, barriers, and cultural dimensions in Native American urban youth.

Authors:  Alina I Palimaru; Ryan A Brown; Wendy M Troxel; Daniel L Dickerson; Carrie L Johnson; Elizabeth J D'Amico
Journal:  Sleep Health       Date:  2020-06-08

2.  Neural Buddhism and Christian mindfulness in medicine.

Authors:  Jonathan Kopel; Gary R Habermas
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-03-28

3.  Association Between Pain and Mindfulness in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Authors:  Angela Senders; Alena Borgatti; Douglas Hanes; Lynne Shinto
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Measuring a Journey without Goal: Meditation, Spirituality, and Physiology.

Authors:  Heather Buttle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The default mode network as a biomarker for monitoring the therapeutic effects of meditation.

Authors:  Rozalyn Simon; Maria Engström
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-09

6.  The Meditative Mind: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of MRI Studies.

Authors:  Maddalena Boccia; Laura Piccardi; Paola Guariglia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  EEG Brain Activity in Dynamic Health Qigong Training: Same Effects for Mental Practice and Physical Training?

Authors:  Diana Henz; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-07

8.  Editorial: Neuroimaging and Neuropsychology of Meditation States.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Franco Fabbro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-19

9.  Identifying environmental sounds: a multimodal mapping study.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Cinzia Canderan; Dario Marin; Marta Maieron; Michele Gremese; Serena D'Agostini; Franco Fabbro; Miran Skrap
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Prevalence, patterns, and predictors of meditation use among US adults: A nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Holger Cramer; Helen Hall; Matthew Leach; Jane Frawley; Yan Zhang; Brenda Leung; Jon Adams; Romy Lauche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.