BACKGROUNDS: We evaluated the prognostic value of the intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake in oral cavity cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 45 patients who underwent pretreatment (18) F-FDG PET/CT. The intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake was represented as the heterogeneity factor (HF), defined as the derivative (dV/dT) of a volume-threshold function for a primary tumor. We measured the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ) and volumetric PET parameters. The relationship between HF and clinical parameters, as well as other PET parameters, was evaluated. RESULTS: The HF was significantly correlated with SUVmax (r = -0.353, P = 0.017), metabolic tumor volume (r = -0.708, P < 0.0001), and total lesion glycolysis (r = -0.709, P < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis revealed not only cervical lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio = 5.983; P = 0.022) but also HF (hazard ratio = 2.49 × 10(-4) ; P = 0.002) to be independent predictors of overall survival. Those patients with HF < -0.13 showed a worse prognosis than those with HF ≥ -0.13 (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake may be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in addition to cervical lymph node metastasis in oral cavity cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 110:702-706.
BACKGROUNDS: We evaluated the prognostic value of the intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake in oral cavity cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 45 patients who underwent pretreatment (18) F-FDG PET/CT. The intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake was represented as the heterogeneity factor (HF), defined as the derivative (dV/dT) of a volume-threshold function for a primary tumor. We measured the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ) and volumetric PET parameters. The relationship between HF and clinical parameters, as well as other PET parameters, was evaluated. RESULTS: The HF was significantly correlated with SUVmax (r = -0.353, P = 0.017), metabolic tumor volume (r = -0.708, P < 0.0001), and total lesion glycolysis (r = -0.709, P < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis revealed not only cervical lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio = 5.983; P = 0.022) but also HF (hazard ratio = 2.49 × 10(-4) ; P = 0.002) to be independent predictors of overall survival. Those patients with HF < -0.13 showed a worse prognosis than those with HF ≥ -0.13 (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake may be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in addition to cervical lymph node metastasis in oral cavity cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 110:702-706.
Authors: Jeong-Won Lee; Jeong-Yeol Park; Hyun Ju Lee; Jong Jin Lee; Seung Hwan Moon; Seo Young Kang; Gi Jeong Cheon; Hyun Hoon Chung Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael R Folkert; Jeremy Setton; Aditya P Apte; Milan Grkovski; Robert J Young; Heiko Schöder; Wade L Thorstad; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy; Jung Hun Oh Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 3.609