Literature DB >> 24974316

Multivariate gene-set testing based on graphical models.

Nicolas Städler1, Sach Mukherjee2.   

Abstract

The identification of predefined groups of genes ("gene-sets") which are differentially expressed between two conditions ("gene-set analysis", or GSA) is a very popular analysis in bioinformatics. GSA incorporates biological knowledge by aggregating over genes that are believed to be functionally related. This can enhance statistical power over analyses that consider only one gene at a time. However, currently available GSA approaches are based on univariate two-sample comparison of single genes. This means that they cannot test for multivariate hypotheses such as differences in covariance structure between the two conditions. Yet interplay between genes is a central aspect of biological investigation and it is likely that such interplay may differ between conditions. This paper proposes a novel approach for gene-set analysis that allows for truly multivariate hypotheses, in particular differences in gene-gene networks between conditions. Testing hypotheses concerning networks is challenging due the nature of the underlying estimation problem. Our starting point is a recent, general approach for high-dimensional two-sample testing. We refine the approach and show how it can be used to perform multivariate, network-based gene-set testing. We validate the approach in simulated examples and show results using high-throughput data from several studies in cancer biology.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer biology; Differential network; Gaussian graphical models; Gene-set testing; Graphical Lasso

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24974316     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  5 in total

1.  Extracting the Strongest Signals from Omics Data: Differentially Expressed Pathways and Beyond.

Authors:  Galina Glazko; Yasir Rahmatallah; Boris Zybailov; Frank Emmert-Streib
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

2.  Association between dietary intake networks identified through a Gaussian graphical model and the risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Madhawa Gunathilake; Tung Hoang; Jeonghee Lee; Jeongseon Kim
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Nutrition-wide association study of microbiome diversity and composition in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Tung Hoang; Min Jung Kim; Ji Won Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jeeyoo Lee; Aesun Shin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study.

Authors:  Nicolas Städler; Frank Dondelinger; Steven M Hill; Rehan Akbani; Yiling Lu; Gordon B Mills; Sach Mukherjee
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  A comparative study of topology-based pathway enrichment analysis methods.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Ali Shojaie; George Michailidis
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.