Literature DB >> 28849561

Extracting the Strongest Signals from Omics Data: Differentially Expressed Pathways and Beyond.

Galina Glazko1, Yasir Rahmatallah2, Boris Zybailov3, Frank Emmert-Streib4.   

Abstract

The analysis of gene sets (in a form of functionally related genes or pathways) has become the method of choice for extracting the strongest signals from omics data. The motivation behind using gene sets instead of individual genes is two-fold. First, this approach incorporates pre-existing biological knowledge into the analysis and facilitates the interpretation of experimental results. Second, it employs a statistical hypotheses testing framework. Here, we briefly review main Gene Set Analysis (GSA) approaches for testing differential expression of gene sets and several GSA approaches for testing statistical hypotheses beyond differential expression that allow extracting additional biological information from the data. We distinguish three major types of GSA approaches testing: (1) differential expression (DE), (2) differential variability (DV), and (3) differential co-expression (DC) of gene sets between two phenotypes. We also present comparative power analysis and Type I error rates for different approaches in each major type of GSA on simulated data. Our evaluation presents a concise guideline for selecting GSA approaches best performing under particular experimental settings. The value of the three major types of GSA approaches is illustrated with real data example. While being applied to the same data set, major types of GSA approaches result in complementary biological information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competitive; Differential co-expression; Differential expression; Differential variability; Gene set analysis approaches; Hypotheses testing; Omics data; Self-contained

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28849561      PMCID: PMC5846121          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7027-8_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  57 in total

1.  A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.

Authors:  Haim Y Bar; James G Booth; Martin T Wells
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-06

2.  A tail strength measure for assessing the overall univariate significance in a dataset.

Authors:  Jonathan Taylor; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics.

Authors:  Juliane Schäfer; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2005-11-14

4.  Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  A multivariate extension of the gene set enrichment analysis.

Authors:  Lev Klebanov; Galina Glazko; Peter Salzman; Andrei Yakovlev; Yuanhui Xiao
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.122

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Camera: a competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation.

Authors:  Di Wu; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Self-contained gene-set analysis of expression data: an evaluation of existing and novel methods.

Authors:  Brooke L Fridley; Gregory D Jenkins; Joanna M Biernacka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Statistical methods for gene set co-expression analysis.

Authors:  YounJeong Choi; Christina Kendziorski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.