Literature DB >> 24973998

The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.

Meghan M McConnell1, Christina St-Onge, Meredith E Young.   

Abstract

Testing has been shown to enhance retention of learned information beyond simple studying, a phenomena known as test-enhanced learning (TEL). Research has shown that TEL effects are greater for tests that require the production of responses [e.g., short-answer questions (SAQs)] relative to tests that require the recognition of correct answers [e.g., multiple-choice questions (MCQs)]. High stakes licensure examinations have recently differentiated MCQs that require the application of clinical knowledge (context-rich MCQs) from MCQs that rely on the recognition of "facts" (context-free MCQs). The present study investigated the influence of different types of educational activities (including studying, SAQs, context-rich MCQs and context-free MCQs) on later performance on a mock licensure examination. Fourth-year medical students (n = 224) from four Quebec universities completed four educational activities: one reading-based activity and three quiz-based activities (SAQs, context-rich MCQs, and context-free MCQs). We assessed the influence of the type of educational activity on students' subsequent performance in a mock licensure examination, which consisted of two types of context-rich MCQs: (1) verbatim replications of previous items and (2) items that tested the same learning objective but were new. Mean accuracy scores on the mock licensure exam were higher when intervening educational activities contained either context-rich MCQs (Mean z-score = 0.40) or SAQs (M = 0.39) compared to context-free MCQs (M = -0.38) or study only items (M = -0.42; all p < 0.001). Higher mean scores were only present for verbatim items (p < 0.001). The benefit of testing was observed when intervening educational activities required either the generation of a response (SAQs) or the application of knowledge (context-rich MCQs); however, this effect was only observed for verbatim test items. These data provide evidence that context-rich MCQs and SAQs enhance learning through testing compared to context-free MCQs or studying alone. The extent to which these findings generalize beyond verbatim questions remains to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973998     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9529-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  14 in total

Review 1.  Using Testing as a Learning Tool.

Authors:  Brenda W Yang; Juan Razo; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Self-reported Learning and Study Strategies in First and Second Year Medical Students.

Authors:  Marissa Roffler; Ryan Sheehy
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-18

3.  Application of Frequent, Spaced Multiple-choice Questions as an Educational Tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Matthew J Rustici; Vincent J Wang; Kate E Dorney; Joshua Nagler; P Jamil Madati; Patricia Ziegler; Genie Roosevelt
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-07-09

4.  The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.

Authors:  Bonnie R Rush; David C Rankin; Brad J White
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.

Authors:  Karen Luetsch; Judith Burrows
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Test-Enhanced E-Learning Strategies in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Randomized Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lisa A DelSignore; Traci A Wolbrink; David Zurakowski; Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Effectiveness of Test-Enhanced Learning (TEL) in lectures for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Aisha Ayyub; Usman Mahboob
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios.

Authors:  Sascha Ludwig; Nikolai Schuelper; Jamie Brown; Sven Anders; Tobias Raupach
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities.

Authors:  Stefan Müller; Utz Settmacher; Ines Koch; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-15

10.  Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Francis Deng; Jeffrey A Gluckstein; Douglas P Larsen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.