Literature DB >> 34926177

Current state of hybrid solutions for aortic arch aneurysms.

G Chad Hughes1, Andrew Vekstein1.   

Abstract

Since its inception in the early 2000s, hybrid arch repair (HAR) has evolved from a novel approach to a well-established treatment modality for aortic arch pathology in appropriately selected patients. HAR procedures have been proposed as a means to circumvent the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with open total arch replacement. These procedures, all of which remain off-label applications of approved endograft technology, combine more conventional open surgical techniques, to create endograft landing zones, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair to exclude the aortic pathology from the circulation. The current classification system for HAR was proposed in 2013 and consists of three types, designated by the Roman numerals I, II and III. The current system has become outdated, however, with the advent of newer technologies, and herein we propose a new, updated classification system that is more encompassing with regards to the broad array of options available to treat aortic arch disease. Likewise, an institutional algorithm to guide patient and operative selection for HAR is presented. Patients are considered for HAR if they have either high-risk comorbidities or high-risk anatomy, with an important feature of the algorithm being that any decisions about repair strategy should be made by a surgical team with expertise in both open and endovascular techniques. Despite being performed for nearly two decades, the evidence around HAR consists mainly of single center series (level B-C evidence) with no randomized controlled trials. The data suggest HAR to be a safe alternative to open repair with acceptable short and mid-term results. As we as aortic surgeons continue to move towards less invasive approaches, both conventional open and hybrid techniques will remain important tools in the toolbox for arch repair, although the advent of multi-branched arch endografts will almost certainly reduce the extent of open or hybrid repair in many patients and eliminate it altogether in others. 2021 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid; aneurysm; aortic arch; dissection; endovascular

Year:  2021        PMID: 34926177      PMCID: PMC8640885          DOI: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  34 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology,American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons,and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Aortic arch stenting: current strategies, new technologies and future directions.

Authors:  Arjune S Dhanekula; Matthew P Sweet; Nimesh Desai; Christopher R Burke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Outcomes of Planned Two-Stage Hybrid Aortic Repair With Dacron-Replaced Proximal Landing Zone.

Authors:  David N Ranney; Babatunde A Yerokun; Ehsan Benrashid; Muath Bishawi; Adam Williams; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Evolving practice pattern changes and outcomes in the era of hybrid aortic arch repair.

Authors:  Ehsan Benrashid; Hanghang Wang; Jeffrey E Keenan; Nicholas D Andersen; James M Meza; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Zone 1 Aortic Arch Hybrid Endovascular Repair with Extra-anatomical Bypass: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Gr Bayfield; Miny Samuel; Anna-Louise E Bayfield; Andrew Mtl Choong
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  "Hybrid" repair of aneurysms of the transverse aortic arch: midterm results.

Authors:  G Chad Hughes; Mani A Daneshmand; Keki R Balsara; Hardean A Achneck; Bantayehu Sileshi; Sean M Lee; Richard L McCann
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph Bavaria; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Patrick Moeller; Wilson Szeto; Nimesh Desai; Alberto Pochettino
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Permissive Hypertension and Collateral Revascularization May Allow Avoidance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  E Hope Weissler; Soraya L Voigt; Vignesh Raman; Oliver Jawitz; Julie Doberne; Jatin Anand; Ryan Plichta; Jeffrey G Gaca; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Results with an algorithmic approach to hybrid repair of the aortic arch.

Authors:  Nicholas D Andersen; Judson B Williams; Jennifer M Hanna; Asad A Shah; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of hybrid aortic arch replacement.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Moulakakis; Spyridon N Mylonas; Fotis Markatis; Thomas Kotsis; John Kakisis; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  A prebifurcated axillobifemoral polytetrafluoroethylene graft simplifies carotid to carotid to subclavian bypass.

Authors:  Thomas J Perry; Timur P Sarac; Kristine Orion; John Bozinovski; Mounir Haurani; Bryan W Tillman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2022-09-17

2.  Comparison of techniques for left subclavian artery preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of both endovascular and surgical revascularization.

Authors:  Yuchong Zhang; Xinsheng Xie; Ye Yuan; Chengkai Hu; Enci Wang; Yufei Zhao; Peng Lin; Zheyun Li; Fandi Mo; Weiguo Fu; Lixin Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 3.  Comprehensive review of hybrid aortic arch repair with focus on zone 0 TEVAR and our institutional experience.

Authors:  Saket Singh; Stevan S Pupovac; Roland Assi; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.