Thomas Arnason1, Michal Kamionek, Michelle Yang, Rhonda K Yantiss, Joseph Misdraji. 1. From the Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Arnason, Kamionek, and Misdraji); the Division of Anatomical Pathology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (Dr Arnason); the Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester (Dr Yang); and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (Dr Yantiss). Dr Kamionek is now located at the Carolinas Pathology Group, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Appendiceal adenomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) confined to the appendix are cured by appendectomy. However, involvement of the proximal margin raises concern for residual disease. Some patients with a positive margin at appendectomy undergo cecal resection to eliminate a perceived risk for tumor recurrence or dissemination, although that likelihood is assumed rather than demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether involvement of the proximal appendiceal resection margin by adenoma or LAMN is a risk factor for local development of recurrence or pseudomyxoma peritonei. DESIGN: Appendiceal adenomas and LAMNs confined to the appendix were considered for the study if they showed neoplasia or dissecting mucin at the proximal margin. The presence or absence of residual tumor in cecal resections was determined. Follow-up data were obtained from clinical records. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (14 female, 2 male) with LAMN (n = 15) or adenoma (n = 1) and an involved proximal resection margin were identified, including 9 with neoplastic epithelium within the lumen and 7 with acellular mucin in the appendiceal wall at the margin. Six patients underwent cecal resection and the others were nonsurgically followed. No cecal resection had residual neoplasia. No patient developed recurrence or pseudomyxoma peritonei (mean follow-up, 4.7 years). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAMNs confined to the appendix, involvement of the appendectomy margin by neoplastic epithelium or acellular mucin does not predict recurrence of disease, even without further surgery. A conservative approach to managing these patients can be justified.
CONTEXT: Appendiceal adenomas and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) confined to the appendix are cured by appendectomy. However, involvement of the proximal margin raises concern for residual disease. Some patients with a positive margin at appendectomy undergo cecal resection to eliminate a perceived risk for tumor recurrence or dissemination, although that likelihood is assumed rather than demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether involvement of the proximal appendiceal resection margin by adenoma or LAMN is a risk factor for local development of recurrence or pseudomyxoma peritonei. DESIGN:Appendiceal adenomas and LAMNs confined to the appendix were considered for the study if they showed neoplasia or dissecting mucin at the proximal margin. The presence or absence of residual tumor in cecal resections was determined. Follow-up data were obtained from clinical records. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (14 female, 2 male) with LAMN (n = 15) or adenoma (n = 1) and an involved proximal resection margin were identified, including 9 with neoplastic epithelium within the lumen and 7 with acellular mucin in the appendiceal wall at the margin. Six patients underwent cecal resection and the others were nonsurgically followed. No cecal resection had residual neoplasia. No patient developed recurrence or pseudomyxoma peritonei (mean follow-up, 4.7 years). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LAMNs confined to the appendix, involvement of the appendectomy margin by neoplastic epithelium or acellular mucin does not predict recurrence of disease, even without further surgery. A conservative approach to managing these patients can be justified.
Authors: Mohannad Al-Tarakji; Syed Muhammad Ali; Amjad Ali Shah; Mahir Abdulla Petkar; Salman Mirza; Rajvir Singh; Ahmad Zarour Journal: Case Rep Surg Date: 2020-09-14
Authors: Mark A Valasek; Irene Thung; Esha Gollapalle; Alexey A Hodkoff; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Joel M Baumgartner; Vera Vavinskaya; Grace Y Lin; Ann P Tipps; Mojgan V Hosseini; Andrew M Lowy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ramon R Gorter; Hasan H Eker; Marguerite A W Gorter-Stam; Gabor S A Abis; Amish Acharya; Marjolein Ankersmit; Stavros A Antoniou; Simone Arolfo; Benjamin Babic; Luigi Boni; Marlieke Bruntink; Dieuwertje A van Dam; Barbara Defoort; Charlotte L Deijen; F Borja DeLacy; Peter Mnyh Go; Annelieke M K Harmsen; Rick S van den Helder; Florin Iordache; Johannes C F Ket; Filip E Muysoms; M Mahir Ozmen; Michail Papoulas; Michael Rhodes; Jennifer Straatman; Mark Tenhagen; Victor Turrado; Andras Vereczkei; Ramon Vilallonga; Jort D Deelder; Jaap Bonjer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.584