Literature DB >> 24970957

Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies diagnosable by prenatal ultrasound in patients in neonatal intensive care units of Cali, Colombia.

Wilmar Saldarriaga-Gil1, Fabián Andrés Ruiz-Murcia2, Andrés Fandiño-Losada3, Manuel Enrique Cruz-Perea4, Carolina Isaza de Lourido5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study aim was to determine the frequency of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of congenital anomalies in Newborns (NB) with birth defects hospitalized in two Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) of Cali (Colombia) and to identify socio-demographic factors associated with lack of such diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was an observational cross-sectional study. NB with congenital defects diagnosable by prenatal ultrasound (CDDPU), who were hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units (NICU), were included in this study. A format of data collection for mothers, about prenatal ultra-sonographies, socio-demographic data and information on prenatal and definitive diagnosis of their conditions was applied. Multiple logistic and Cox regressions analyses were done.
RESULTS: 173 NB were included, 42.8% of cases had no prenatal diagnosis of CDDPU; among them, 59.5% had no prenatal ultrasound (PNUS). Lack of PNUS was associated with maternal age, 25 to 34 years (Odds Ratio [OR]: 4.41) and 35 to 47 years (OR: 5.24), with low levels of maternal education (OR: 8.70) and with only a PNUS compared to having two or more PNUS (OR: 4.00). Mothers without health insurance tend to be delayed twice the time to access the first PNUS in comparison to mothers with payment health insurance (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.51). Among mothers who had PNUS, screening sensitivity of CDDPU after the 19(th) gestational week was 79.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of prenatal diagnosis is low and is explained by lack of PNUS, or by lack of diagnostic in the PNUS. An association between lack of PNUS and late age pregnancy and low level of maternal education was found. In addition, uninsured mothers tend to delay twice in accessing to the first PNUS in comparison to mothers with health insurance. It is necessary to establish national policies which ensure access to appropriate, timely and good quality prenatal care for all pregnant women in Colombia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital anomalies; accessibility to health services; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24970957      PMCID: PMC4045225     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)        ISSN: 0120-8322


  11 in total

1.  Best practice guidelines: fetal surgery.

Authors:  Nada Sudhakaran; Uma Sothinathan; Shailesh Patel
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 2.  Gastroschisis: an update.

Authors:  Andrew J A Holland; Karen Walker; Nadia Badawi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Fetal cardiac screening: why bother?

Authors:  G Sharland
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele?

Authors:  Joe Leigh Simpson; Michael F Greene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

6.  A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

Authors:  N Scott Adzick; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; John W Brock; Pamela K Burrows; Mark P Johnson; Lori J Howell; Jody A Farrell; Mary E Dabrowiak; Leslie N Sutton; Nalin Gupta; Noel B Tulipan; Mary E D'Alton; Diana L Farmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  A M Fraser; J E Brockert; R H Ward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Diagnostic performance of routine ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities in an unselected Swedish population in 2000-2005.

Authors:  G Romosan; E Henriksson; A Rylander; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  From diagnosis to birth: parents' experience when expecting a child with congenital anomaly.

Authors:  Björk Askelsdóttir; Sherrill Conroy; Gwen Rempel
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.968

View more
  3 in total

1.  ANTENATAL EVENTS AMONGST MOTHERS OF BABIES WITH OROFACIAL CLEFTS.

Authors:  A A Olusanya; A I Michael; O A Olawoye; V I Akinmoladun
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2020-06

2.  Investigating the use of ultrasonography for the antenatal diagnosis of structural congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Michele Goley; Sidonie Sakula-Barry; Nana Adofo-Ansong; Laurence Isaaya Ntawunga; Maame Tekyiwa Botchway; Ann Horton Kelly; Naomi Wright
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-08-20

3.  Value and Diagnostic Efficacy of Fetal Morphology Assessment Using Ultrasound in A Poor-Resource Setting.

Authors:  Ofonime N Ukweh; Theophilus I Ugbem; Chibuike M Okeke; Ernest U Ekpo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.