Duveken B Y Fontein1, Ayoub Charehbili2, Johan W R Nortier3, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg1, Judith R Kroep3, H Putter4, Yvonne van Riet5, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen5, Bart de Valk6, Jetske M Meerum Terwogt7, Gijs D Algie8, Gerrit-Jan Liefers1, Sabine Linn9, Cornelis J H van de Velde10. 1. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Surgery, MC Zuiderzee, Lelystad, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 10. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.j.h.van_de_velde@lumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is playing an increasing role in the clinical management of breast cancer (BC) and may improve surgical outcomes for postmenopausal, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal duration of NHT before surgery. Here, we present the outcomes of the TEAM IIA trial, a multicentre, phase II trial investigating the efficacy of six months of neoadjuvant exemestane in postmenopausal, strong ER-positive (ER+, ⩾50%) BC patients. METHODS: 102 patients (stage T2-T4ac) were included in the study after exclusion of ineligible patients. Primary end-point was clinical response at 3 and 6 months as measured by palpation. Secondary end-point was radiological response as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography and/or ultrasound. Linear mixed models (95% confidence interval (CI)) were used to compare changes in mean tumour size (in mm) between baseline, 3 and 6 months after the start of endocrine therapy. Conversion rates from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery (BCS) were evaluated. RESULTS:Median age of all patients was 72 years (range 53-88). Overall response rate by clinical palpation was 64.5% in all patients with a final palpation measurement. Four patients had clinically progressive disease. 63 patients had both 3-month and >3-month palpation measurements. Overall response was 58.7% at 3 months and 68.3% at final palpation (>3 months). Mean tumour size by clinical palpation at T=0 was 39.1mm (95% CI 34.8-43.4mm), and decreased to 23.0mm (95% CI 18.7-27.2mm) and 16.7 mm (95% CI 12.6-20.8) at T=3 and T>3 months, respectively (p=0.001). Final radiological response rates at the end of treatment for MRI (n=37), ultrasound (n=77) and mammography (n=56) were 70.3%, 41.6% and 48.2%, respectively. Feasibility of BCS improved from 61.8% to 70.6% (McNemar p=0.012). CONCLUSION: 6 months of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy helps reduce mean tumour size further in strongly ER-positive BC patients without significant side-effects compared to 3 months. Nevertheless, some patients still experience disease progression under exemestane. Feasibility of breast conservation rates improved by almost 10%.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is playing an increasing role in the clinical management of breast cancer (BC) and may improve surgical outcomes for postmenopausal, oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC patients. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal duration of NHT before surgery. Here, we present the outcomes of the TEAM IIA trial, a multicentre, phase II trial investigating the efficacy of six months of neoadjuvant exemestane in postmenopausal, strong ER-positive (ER+, ⩾50%) BC patients. METHODS: 102 patients (stage T2-T4ac) were included in the study after exclusion of ineligible patients. Primary end-point was clinical response at 3 and 6 months as measured by palpation. Secondary end-point was radiological response as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mammography and/or ultrasound. Linear mixed models (95% confidence interval (CI)) were used to compare changes in mean tumour size (in mm) between baseline, 3 and 6 months after the start of endocrine therapy. Conversion rates from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery (BCS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Median age of all patients was 72 years (range 53-88). Overall response rate by clinical palpation was 64.5% in all patients with a final palpation measurement. Four patients had clinically progressive disease. 63 patients had both 3-month and >3-month palpation measurements. Overall response was 58.7% at 3 months and 68.3% at final palpation (>3 months). Mean tumour size by clinical palpation at T=0 was 39.1mm (95% CI 34.8-43.4mm), and decreased to 23.0mm (95% CI 18.7-27.2mm) and 16.7 mm (95% CI 12.6-20.8) at T=3 and T>3 months, respectively (p=0.001). Final radiological response rates at the end of treatment for MRI (n=37), ultrasound (n=77) and mammography (n=56) were 70.3%, 41.6% and 48.2%, respectively. Feasibility of BCS improved from 61.8% to 70.6% (McNemar p=0.012). CONCLUSION: 6 months of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy helps reduce mean tumour size further in strongly ER-positive BC patients without significant side-effects compared to 3 months. Nevertheless, some patients still experience disease progression under exemestane. Feasibility of breast conservation rates improved by almost 10%.
Authors: Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Ramon Colomer; Cristina Saura; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Tomás Pascual; Isabel T Rubio; Octavio Burgués; Lourdes Marcos; César A Rodríguez; Miguel Martín; Ana Lluch Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-02-01
Authors: Ingrid A Mayer; Aleix Prat; Daniel Egle; Sibel Blau; J Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo; Michael Gnant; Peter A Fasching; Marco Colleoni; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Christian F Singer; Sara Hurvitz; Laura García Estévez; Peter A van Dam; Sherko Kümmel; Christoph Mundhenke; Frankie Holmes; Naveen Babbar; Laure Charbonnier; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Florian D Vogl; Dalila Sellami; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Danilo D A Fonseca Reis Silva; Joao Victor Machado Alessi; Max Senna Mano Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2016-01-07
Authors: Denise Garcia; Julie B Siegel; David A Mahvi; Biqi Zhang; David M Mahvi; E Ramsay Camp; Whitney Graybill; Stephen J Savage; Antonio Giordano; Sara Giordano; Denise Carneiro-Pla; Mahsa Javid; Aaron P Lesher; Andrea Abbott; Nancy Klauber DeMore Journal: Clin Oncol Res Date: 2020-06-26