Literature DB >> 24970266

Parents' perspectives on safety in neonatal intensive care: a mixed-methods study.

Audrey Lyndon1, Carrie H Jacobson1, Kelly M Fagan2, Kirsten Wisner3, Linda S Franck1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about how parents think about neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) safety. Due to their physiologic immaturity and small size, infants in NICUs are especially vulnerable to injury from their medical care. Campaigns are underway to integrate patients and family members into patient safety. This study aimed to describe how parents of infants in the NICU conceptualise patient safety and what kinds of concerns they have about safety.
METHODS: This mixed-methods study employed questionnaires, interviews and observation with parents of infant patients in an academic medical centre NICU. Measures included parent stress, family-centredness and types of safety concerns.
RESULTS: 46 parents completed questionnaires and 14 of these parents also participated in 10 interviews (including 4 couple interviews). Infants had a range of medical and surgical problems, including prematurity, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and congenital cardiac disease. Parents were positive about their infants' care and had low levels of concern about the safety of procedures. Parents reporting more stress had more concerns. We identified three overlapping domains in parents' conceptualisations of safety in the NICU, including physical, developmental and emotional safety. Parents demonstrated sophisticated understanding of how environmental, treatment and personnel factors could potentially influence their infants' developmental and emotional health.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents have safety concerns that cannot be addressed solely by reducing errors in the NICU. Parent engagement strategies that respect parents as partners in safety and address how clinical treatment articulates with physical, developmental and emotional safety domains may result in safety improvements. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical microsystem; Critical care; Paediatrics; Patient safety; Patient-centred care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24970266      PMCID: PMC4198474          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  16 in total

Review 1.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Patient safety in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  William H Edwards
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Am I (un)safe here? Chemotherapy patients' perspectives towards engaging in their safety.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach; Martin Wernli
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Measuring neonatal intensive care unit-related parental stress.

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Susanne Cox; Alison Allen; Ira Winter
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Putting the 'patient' in patient safety: a qualitative study of consumer experiences.

Authors:  Cheryl Rathert; Julie Brandt; Eric S Williams
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care: changing the mental model from inevitability to preventability.

Authors:  Gautham K Suresh; William H Edwards
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Patient safety in the context of neonatal intensive care: research and educational opportunities.

Authors:  Tonse N K Raju; Gautham Suresh; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Parental involvement in neonatal comfort care.

Authors:  Caryl Skene; Linda Franck; Penny Curtis; Kate Gerrish
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-07-12

9.  Parent stress levels during children's hospital recovery after congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  Linda S Franck; Annette McQuillan; Jo Wray; Michael P W Grocott; Allan Goldman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 10.  Review: engaging patients as vigilant partners in safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.929

View more
  3 in total

1.  Parents' Perspectives on Navigating the Work of Speaking Up in the NICU.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Kirsten Wisner; Carrie Holschuh; Kelly M Fagan; Linda S Franck
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth.

Authors:  Audrey Lyndon; Jennifer Malana; Laura C Hedli; Jules Sherman; Henry C Lee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2018-03-16

3.  Distress and post-traumatic stress in parents of patients with congenital gastrointestinal malformations: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  D Roorda; A F W van der Steeg; M van Dijk; J P M Derikx; R R Gorter; J Rotteveel; J B van Goudoever; L W E van Heurn; J Oosterlaan; L Haverman
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 4.303

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.