INTRODUCTION: Systematic computed tomography angiographic (CTA) studies investigating variation in internal carotid artery (ICA) luminal diameters (LDs) are scarce. Knowledge of the normal intra-individual LD variability would provide a cut-off value for detection of more subtle collapses. In addition, low intra-individual variability would allow using contralateral LD as a reference for estimation of stenosis degree in cases where ipsilateral measurement is hampered. Therefore, our aim was to investigate intra-individual LD variation of normal ICA. METHODS: We retrospectively collected multidetector high-speed CTAs of 104 patients younger than 40 years who were considered not to have carotid pathology. We carried out independent measurements of the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA LDs bilaterally from axial source images by two observers, analysing side-to-side LD differences from averaged double measurements with a paired t test. RESULTS: We discovered no significant side-to-side LD differences. In the female group, the mean differences (mm) with 95% confidence intervals were 0.08 (0.00, 0.17) for CCA and 0.03 (-0.04, 0.11) for ICA, with ICA LD standard deviation of 0.4 mm. In the male group, these were: 0.06 (-0.04, 0.17), 0.02 (-0.07, 0.11) and 0.4 mm, respectively. We detected no ICA agenesis. CONCLUSION: The intrinsic intra-individual variation of the LD of normal ICA is minimal. This uniformity may serve as the basis for detection of subtle grades of side-to-side variation caused by pathology.
INTRODUCTION: Systematic computed tomography angiographic (CTA) studies investigating variation in internal carotid artery (ICA) luminal diameters (LDs) are scarce. Knowledge of the normal intra-individual LD variability would provide a cut-off value for detection of more subtle collapses. In addition, low intra-individual variability would allow using contralateral LD as a reference for estimation of stenosis degree in cases where ipsilateral measurement is hampered. Therefore, our aim was to investigate intra-individual LD variation of normal ICA. METHODS: We retrospectively collected multidetector high-speed CTAs of 104 patients younger than 40 years who were considered not to have carotid pathology. We carried out independent measurements of the common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA LDs bilaterally from axial source images by two observers, analysing side-to-side LD differences from averaged double measurements with a paired t test. RESULTS: We discovered no significant side-to-side LD differences. In the female group, the mean differences (mm) with 95% confidence intervals were 0.08 (0.00, 0.17) for CCA and 0.03 (-0.04, 0.11) for ICA, with ICA LD standard deviation of 0.4 mm. In the male group, these were: 0.06 (-0.04, 0.17), 0.02 (-0.07, 0.11) and 0.4 mm, respectively. We detected no ICA agenesis. CONCLUSION: The intrinsic intra-individual variation of the LD of normal ICA is minimal. This uniformity may serve as the basis for detection of subtle grades of side-to-side variation caused by pathology.
Authors: Allan J Fox; Michael Eliasziw; Peter M Rothwell; Matthias H Schmidt; Charles P Warlow; Henry J M Barnett Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jaroslaw Krejza; Michal Arkuszewski; Scott E Kasner; John Weigele; Andrzej Ustymowicz; Robert W Hurst; Brett L Cucchiara; Steven R Messe Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Suvi Maaria Koskinen; Heli Silvennoinen; Petra Ijäs; Krista Nuotio; Leena Valanne; Perttu J Lindsberg; Lauri Soinne Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Krista Nuotio; Suvi M Koskinen; Laura Mäkitie; Jarno Tuimala; Petra Ijäs; Hanna M Heikkilä; Jani Saksi; Pirkka Vikatmaa; Pia Sorto; Sonja Kasari; Ilari Paakkari; Heli Silvennoinen; Leena Valanne; Mikko I Mäyränpää; Lauri Soinne; Petri T Kovanen; Perttu J Lindsberg Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 4.003