Literature DB >> 24969798

Validated competing event model for the stage I-II endometrial cancer population.

Ruben Carmona1, Sachin Gulaya1, James D Murphy1, Brent S Rose2, John Wu1, Sonal Noticewala1, Michael T McHale3, Catheryn M Yashar1, Florin Vaida4, Loren K Mell5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES(S): Early-stage endometrial cancer patients are at higher risk of noncancer mortality than of cancer mortality. Competing event models incorporating comorbidity could help identify women most likely to benefit from treatment intensification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 67,397 women with stage I-II endometrioid adenocarcinoma after total hysterectomy diagnosed from 1988 to 2009 were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and linked SEER-Medicare databases. Using demographic and clinical information, including comorbidity, we sought to develop and validate a risk score to predict the incidence of competing mortality.
RESULTS: In the validation cohort, increasing competing mortality risk score was associated with increased risk of noncancer mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio [SDHR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.30) and decreased risk of endometrial cancer mortality (SDHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78). Controlling for other variables, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) = 1 (SDHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.45-1.82) and CCI >1 (SDHR, 3.31; 95% CI, 2.74-4.01) were associated with increased risk of noncancer mortality. The 10-year cumulative incidences of competing mortality within low-, medium-, and high-risk strata were 27.3% (95% CI, 25.2%-29.4%), 34.6% (95% CI, 32.5%-36.7%), and 50.3% (95% CI, 48.2%-52.6%), respectively. With increasing competing mortality risk score, we observed a significant decline in omega (ω), indicating a diminishing likelihood of benefit from treatment intensification.
CONCLUSION: Comorbidity and other factors influence the risk of competing mortality among patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Competing event models could improve our ability to identify patients likely to benefit from treatment intensification.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969798      PMCID: PMC8783697          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

Review 1.  Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Should cause of death from the death certificate be used to examine cancer-specific survival? A study of patients with distant stage disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lund; Linda C Harlan; K Robin Yabroff; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Applications of crude incidence curves.

Authors:  E L Korn; F J Dorey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Primary radiation therapy for medically inoperable patients with clinical stage I and II endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Iwona Podzielinski; Marcus E Randall; Patrick J Breheny; Pedro F Escobar; David E Cohn; Allison M Quick; Junzo P Chino; Micael Lopez-Acevedo; Jana L Seitz; Jennifer E Zook; Leigh G Seamon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Cause-specific effects of radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy in stage I-II endometrial cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Loren K Mell; Ruben Carmona; Sachin Gulaya; Tina Lu; John Wu; Cheryl C Saenz; Florin Vaida
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Goodness-of-fit test for proportional subdistribution hazards model.

Authors:  Bingqing Zhou; Jason Fine; Glen Laird
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and outcomes in women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Pauline T Truong; Hosam A Kader; Barbara Lacy; Mary Lesperance; Mary V MacNeil; Eric Berthelet; Elissa McMurtrie; Skaria Alexander
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  C L Creutzberg; W L van Putten; P C Koper; M L Lybeert; J J Jobsen; C C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; K A De Winter; L C Lutgens; A C van den Bergh; E van de Steen-Banasik; H Beerman; M van Lent
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Competing event risk stratification may improve the design and efficiency of clinical trials: secondary analysis of SWOG 8794.

Authors:  Kaveh Zakeri; Brent S Rose; Sachin Gulaya; Anthony V D'Amico; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Choice and interpretation of statistical tests used when competing risks are present.

Authors:  James J Dignam; Maria N Kocherginsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nomogram to Predict the Benefit of Intensive Treatment for Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Loren K Mell; Hanjie Shen; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; David I Rosenthal; Kaveh Zakeri; Lucas K Vitzthum; Steven J Frank; Peter B Schiff; Andy M Trotti; James A Bonner; Christopher U Jones; Sue S Yom; Wade L Thorstad; Stuart J Wong; George Shenouda; John A Ridge; Qiang E Zhang; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Improved Method to Stratify Elderly Patients With Cancer at Risk for Competing Events.

Authors:  Ruben Carmona; Kaveh Zakeri; Garrett Green; Lindsay Hwang; Sachin Gulaya; Beibei Xu; Rohan Verma; Casey W Williamson; Daniel P Triplett; Brent S Rose; Hanjie Shen; Florin Vaida; James D Murphy; Loren K Mell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Specificity of Genetic Biomarker Studies in Cancer Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Garrett Green; Ruben Carmona; Kaveh Zakeri; Chih-Han Lee; Saif Borgan; Zaid Marhoon; Andrew Sharabi; Loren K Mell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.