Literature DB >> 24969259

Effect of an integrated cancer support team on caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life care.

Sara L Douglas1, Barbara J Daly1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To test the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary cancer support team (CST) on caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life (EOL) care for family members with advanced cancer.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental pre- and post-test tandem design.
SETTING: Outpatient clinics of a comprehensive cancer center in urban Cleveland, OH. SAMPLE: 106 family caregivers.
METHODS: Participants were enrolled into the control or CST group. Caregiver mood state and social support were measured at enrollment as well as at 3, 9, and 15 months, and satisfaction with EOL care was measured eight weeks after the patient's death. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Caregiver mood state, social support, and satisfaction with EOL care.
FINDINGS: The intervention made no statistically significant contribution to caregiver mood state or perception of social support. The intervention group reported higher satisfaction with overall EOL care as well as five specific areas of EOL satisfaction (i.e., pain relief, information about managing pain, speed in treating symptoms, information regarding side effects, and coordination of care).
CONCLUSIONS: The CST yielded improved EOL satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Although the emotional impact of an impending loss of a loved one may not change with the provision of support, perception that a loved one was well cared for in the terminal phase of illness may have long-range benefits through the grieving process. Investigation of the long-range effects of satisfaction with EOL care on the grieving process is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; end of life; family caregivers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969259      PMCID: PMC4401575          DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.E248-E255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  21 in total

Review 1.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effectiveness trial of an intensive communication structure for families of long-stay ICU patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas; Elizabeth O'Toole; Nahida H Gordon; Rana Hejal; Joel Peerless; James Rowbottom; Allan Garland; Craig Lilly; Clareen Wiencek; Ronald Hickman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Social Support Survey Among Malay Postpartum Women in Kedah, North West of Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  Wan Mohd Rushidi Wan Mahmud; Amir Awang; Mahmood Nazar Mohamed
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2004-07

4.  Use of a self-report-generated Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting mortality.

Authors:  Saima Chaudhry; Lei Jin; David Meltzer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Laurel L Northouse; Maria C Katapodi; Lixin Song; Lingling Zhang; Darlene W Mood
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Predictors of depression and life satisfaction among spousal caregivers in hospice: application of a stress process model.

Authors:  William E Haley; Laurie A LaMonde; Beth Han; Allison M Burton; Ronald Schonwetter
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Ursula K Braun; Rebecca J Beyth; Marvella E Ford; Laurence B McCullough
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument.

Authors:  D F Cella; A E Bonomi; S R Lloyd; D S Tulsky; E Kaplan; P Bonomi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.705

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving information to caregivers of cancer patients: the Herlev Hospital Empowerment of Relatives through More and Earlier information Supply (HERMES) randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Line Lund; Lone Ross; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Lisa Sengelov; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Understanding of Health-related Decision-making Terminology Among Cancer Caregivers.

Authors:  Karen O Moss; Sara L Douglas; Amy R Lipson; Eric Blackstone; Dionne Williams; Siobhan Aaron; Celia E Wills
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.774

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.