BACKGROUND: Electroretinographic measurement instruments allow the variation of several stimulation parameters enabling to study a wide range of retinal processes. The purpose of the present study was to measure human flicker electroretinograms (ERGs) varying temporal modulation, temporal frequency and mean luminance in the photopic and higher mesopic ranges where the change from cone to rod dominance occurs. METHODS: Fourteen healthy subjects (mean age = 31 ± 6) participated in this study. ERG recordings were performed with the RetiPort system (Roland Consult, Germany). The stimuli were ON and OFF sawtooth waves, square wave and sine wave. The temporal frequencies were 4 and 8 Hz. The mean luminance varied from 1 to 60 cd/m(2). RESULTS: The results confirmed the possibility to distinguish between rod- and cone-dominated retinal responses when using the flicker ERG at different temporal frequencies and luminances. We have also evaluated the responses at luminance levels at which the transition between rod- and cone-dominated responses occurs. This transition between rod- and cone-dominated flicker ERG responses is indicated by a significant change in the response characteristics between 4 and 8 cd/m(2) (between 200 and 400 phot Td). CONCLUSIONS: The findings on the transition between rod- and cone-dominated ERGs along with the demonstration of ERG responses to different temporal flicker modulations might be informative for the electrophysiologists when setting up the stimulus at mesopic and photopic luminance levels.
BACKGROUND: Electroretinographic measurement instruments allow the variation of several stimulation parameters enabling to study a wide range of retinal processes. The purpose of the present study was to measure human flicker electroretinograms (ERGs) varying temporal modulation, temporal frequency and mean luminance in the photopic and higher mesopic ranges where the change from cone to rod dominance occurs. METHODS: Fourteen healthy subjects (mean age = 31 ± 6) participated in this study. ERG recordings were performed with the RetiPort system (Roland Consult, Germany). The stimuli were ON and OFF sawtooth waves, square wave and sine wave. The temporal frequencies were 4 and 8 Hz. The mean luminance varied from 1 to 60 cd/m(2). RESULTS: The results confirmed the possibility to distinguish between rod- and cone-dominated retinal responses when using the flicker ERG at different temporal frequencies and luminances. We have also evaluated the responses at luminance levels at which the transition between rod- and cone-dominated responses occurs. This transition between rod- and cone-dominated flicker ERG responses is indicated by a significant change in the response characteristics between 4 and 8 cd/m(2) (between 200 and 400 phot Td). CONCLUSIONS: The findings on the transition between rod- and cone-dominated ERGs along with the demonstration of ERG responses to different temporal flicker modulations might be informative for the electrophysiologists when setting up the stimulus at mesopic and photopic luminance levels.
Authors: Mieke M C Bijveld; Astrid M L Kappers; Frans C C Riemslag; Frank P Hoeben; Anne C L Vrijling; Maria M van Genderen Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Thaddeus P Dryja; Terri L McGee; Eliot L Berson; Gerald A Fishman; Michael A Sandberg; Kenneth R Alexander; Deborah J Derlacki; Aruna S Rajagopalan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Naheed W Khan; Mineo Kondo; Kelaginamane T Hiriyanna; Jeff A Jamison; Ronald A Bush; Paul A Sieving Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Arthur F Resende; Carina T Sanvicente; Hamoon Eshraghi; Alberto Garcia; Kassandra Pickel; Qiang Zhang; Michael Waisbourd; L Jay Katz Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 2.379