OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to investigate neural system habituation to face and eye gaze in fragile X syndrome, a disorder characterized by eye-gaze aversion, among other social and cognitive deficits. METHOD: Participants (ages 15-25 years) were 30 individuals with fragile X syndrome (females, N=14) and a comparison group of 25 individuals without fragile X syndrome (females, N=12) matched for general cognitive ability and autism symptoms. Functional MRI (fMRI) was used to assess brain activation during a gaze habituation task. Participants viewed repeated presentations of four unique faces with either direct or averted eye gaze and judged the direction of eye gaze. RESULTS: Four participants (males, N=4/4; fragile X syndrome, N=3) were excluded because of excessive head motion during fMRI scanning. Behavioral performance did not differ between the groups. Less neural habituation (and significant sensitization) in the fragile X syndrome group was found in the cingulate gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and frontal cortex in response to all faces (direct and averted gaze). Left fusiform habituation in female participants was directly correlated with higher, more typical levels of the fragile X mental retardation protein and inversely correlated with autism symptoms. There was no evidence for differential habituation to direct gaze compared with averted gaze within or between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired habituation and accentuated sensitization in response to face/eye gaze was distributed across multiple levels of neural processing. These results could help inform interventions, such as desensitization therapy, which may help patients with fragile X syndrome modulate anxiety and arousal associated with eye gaze, thereby improving social functioning.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to investigate neural system habituation to face and eye gaze in fragile X syndrome, a disorder characterized by eye-gaze aversion, among other social and cognitive deficits. METHOD:Participants (ages 15-25 years) were 30 individuals with fragile X syndrome (females, N=14) and a comparison group of 25 individuals without fragile X syndrome (females, N=12) matched for general cognitive ability and autism symptoms. Functional MRI (fMRI) was used to assess brain activation during a gaze habituation task. Participants viewed repeated presentations of four unique faces with either direct or averted eye gaze and judged the direction of eye gaze. RESULTS: Four participants (males, N=4/4; fragile X syndrome, N=3) were excluded because of excessive head motion during fMRI scanning. Behavioral performance did not differ between the groups. Less neural habituation (and significant sensitization) in the fragile X syndrome group was found in the cingulate gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and frontal cortex in response to all faces (direct and averted gaze). Left fusiform habituation in female participants was directly correlated with higher, more typical levels of the fragile X mental retardation protein and inversely correlated with autism symptoms. There was no evidence for differential habituation to direct gaze compared with averted gaze within or between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired habituation and accentuated sensitization in response to face/eye gaze was distributed across multiple levels of neural processing. These results could help inform interventions, such as desensitization therapy, which may help patients with fragile X syndrome modulate anxiety and arousal associated with eye gaze, thereby improving social functioning.
Authors: Jeffery N Epstein; B J Casey; Simon T Tonev; Matthew Davidson; Allan L Reiss; Amy Garrett; Stephen P Hinshaw; Laurence L Greenhill; Alan Vitolo; Lisa A Kotler; Matthew A Jarrett; Julie Spicer Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: L Mancini; O Ciccarelli; F Manfredonia; J S Thornton; F Agosta; F Barkhof; C Beckmann; N De Stefano; C Enzinger; F Fazekas; M Filippi; A Gass; J G Hirsch; H Johansen-Berg; L Kappos; T Korteweg; S C Manson; S Marino; P M Matthews; X Montalban; J Palace; C Polman; M Rocca; S Ropele; A Rovira; C Wegner; K Friston; A Thompson; T Yousry Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Emily G Harlow; Sally M Till; Theron A Russell; Lasani S Wijetunge; Peter Kind; Anis Contractor Journal: Neuron Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Indira García-Cordero; Lucas Sedeño; Laura de la Fuente; Andrea Slachevsky; Gonzalo Forno; Francisco Klein; Patricia Lillo; Jesica Ferrari; Clara Rodriguez; Julian Bustin; Teresa Torralva; Sandra Baez; Adrian Yoris; Sol Esteves; Margherita Melloni; Paula Salamone; David Huepe; Facundo Manes; Adolfo M García; Agustín Ibañez Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Gisela M Sandoval; Sehoon Shim; David S Hong; Amy S Garrett; Eve-Marie Quintin; Matthew J Marzelli; Swetapadma Patnaik; Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Jennifer L Bruno; David Romano; Paul Mazaika; Amy A Lightbody; Heather Cody Hazlett; Joseph Piven; Allan L Reiss Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marieke Klein; Marjolein van Donkelaar; Ellen Verhoef; Barbara Franke Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Jessica Klusek; Carly Moser; Joseph Schmidt; Leonard Abbeduto; Jane E Roberts Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Jennifer L Bruno; Sm Hadi Hosseini; Amy A Lightbody; Mai K Manchanda; Allan L Reiss Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Jennifer Lynn Bruno; S M Hadi Hosseini; Manish Saggar; Eve-Marie Quintin; Mira Michelle Raman; Allan L Reiss Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.357