Literature DB >> 24968513

The impact of load on lower body performance variables during the hang power clean.

Timothy J Suchomel, George K Beckham, Glenn A Wright.   

Abstract

This study examined the impact of load on lower body performance variables during the hang power clean. Fourteen men performed the hang power clean at loads of 30%, 45%, 65%, and 80% 1RM. Peak force, velocity, power, force at peak power, velocity at peak power, and rate of force development were compared at each load. The greatest peak force occurred at 80% 1RM. Peak force at 30% 1RM was statistically lower than peak force at 45% (p = 0.022), 65% (p = 0.010), and 80% 1RM (p = 0.018). Force at peak power at 65% and 80% 1RM was statistically greater than force at peak power at 30% (p < 0.01) and 45% 1RM (p < 0.01). The greatest rate of force development occurred at 30% 1RM, but was not statistically different from the rate of force development at 45%, 65%, and 80% 1RM. The rate of force development at 65% 1RM was statistically greater than the rate of force development at 80% 1RM (p = 0.035). No other statistical differences existed in any variable existed. Changes in load affected the peak force, force at peak power, and rate of force development, but not the peak velocity, power, or velocity at peak power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24968513     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2013.861012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  9 in total

1.  The Effects of Body Mass on Optimal Load for Power During Resistance Training.

Authors:  Li Li
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco A Soriano; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Matthew R Rhea; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Power-Time Curve Comparison between Weightlifting Derivatives.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher J Sole
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 5.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Correlational Analysis between Joint-level Kinetics of Countermovement Jumps and Weightlifting Derivatives.

Authors:  Kristof Kipp; Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.928

8.  Force-Time Differences between Ballistic and Non-Ballistic Half-Squats.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher B Taber; Christopher J Sole; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-12

9.  Differences in Kinetics during One- and Two-Leg Hang Power Clean.

Authors:  Ryohei Hayashi; Takuya Yoshida; Yasushi Kariyama
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.