Literature DB >> 24968001

Structure and properties of DNA in apolar solvents.

Annalisa Arcella1, Guillem Portella, Rosana Collepardo-Guevara, Debayan Chakraborty, David J Wales, Modesto Orozco.   

Abstract

The study of nucleic acids in low-polarity environments paves the way for novel biotechnological applications of DNA. Here, we use a repertoire of atomistic molecular simulation tools to study the nature of DNA when placed in a highly apolar environment and when transferred from aqueous to apolar solvent. Our results show that DNA becomes stiffer in apolar solvents and suggest that highly negatively charged states, which are the most prevalent in water, are strongly disfavored in apolar solvents and neutral states with conformations not far from the aqueous ones are the dominant forms. Transfer from water to an apolar solvent such as CCl4 is unlikely to occur, but our results suggest that if forced, the DNA would migrate surrounded by a small shell of water (the higher the DNA charge, the larger the number of water molecules in this shell). Even the neutral form (predicted to be the dominant one in apolar solvents) would surround itself by a small number of highly stable water molecules when moved from water to a highly apolar environment. Neutralization of DNA charges seems a crucial requirement for transfer of DNA to apolar media, and the most likely mechanism to achieve good transfer properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24968001      PMCID: PMC4124876          DOI: 10.1021/jp503816r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


Introduction

DNA is a highly polar molecule, evolved to be stable in high-dielectric environments, such as aqueous solution, which is the main environment considered in most experimental and theoretical studies. However, understanding the properties of DNA in low-polarity environments is crucial for many nanotechnological applications of DNA[1,2] and is instrumental in understanding how nucleic acids acting as antigene or antisense drugs pass through the highly hydrophobic cellular membrane, and how DNA can be transported in the body by means of liposome carriers.[3−7] Water and counterions are crucial to screen the electrostatic repulsion among charged phosphates and also favor the apolar stacking of bases. Accordingly, the large impact of solvent modification on the properties of DNA is not surprising. For example, a subtle change in the neutralizing cation can lead to a dramatic conformational change[8,9] or even to a complete alteration in the sequence-stability rules of the duplex.[10] Addition of ethanol to an aqueous solution induces drastic changes in the duplex structure, forcing a B → A transition. Some organic solvents, such as methanol, formamide, pyridine, or dimethyl sulfoxide,[11−13] induce unfolding and strand separation, or formation of toroid-like conformations,[14−16] while others, such as glycerol[11] or room-temperature ionic liquids,[17] maintain the duplex structure. More surprisingly, a DNA duplex does not lose its structure completely, and the two strands remain bound when DNA is transferred from aqueous solution to the gas phase.[18−20] It is clear that changes in the balance between stabilizing and destabilizing terms controlling DNA structure due to alterations in the solvent are complex and still not well understood. Experimental studies in apolar solvents are challenging because of the difficulty of transferring DNA from water to such media. This problem has motivated several theoretical studies, most of them using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. For example, Cui et al.[21] have examined the structure and stability of DNA in octane, correlating the observed changes with those required for helicase activity. Lin et al.[1] explored the stability of decorated DNAs in interfaces between DNA and chloroform and have previously considered the reaction of DNA to high concentrations of pyridine.[22] Finally, Khalid et al.[23] used coarse-grained models to study the insertion of duplex DNA into a lipid bilayer, finding a significant associated free energy barrier, even for small duplexes. Here we use large-scale atomistic MD simulations and discrete path sampling to investigate the conformations sampled by a short DNA duplex in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), a medium comparable to the interior of a biological membrane. We have also explored the (free) energy and structural differences associated with the change of phase of a duplex DNA from water to CCl4. Finally we analyzed for the first time the possibility that DNA acts as a proton donor/acceptor when it crosses from a polar to an apolar medium. Our results suggest that DNA, at least a short fragment, can maintain its duplex structure for significant periods of time in an apolar solvent and, surprisingly, appears more rigid in such media than when immersed in aqueous solution. Transfer from aqueous to apolar solvents is, obviously, strongly disfavored, especially if the DNA remains fully charged. Typically, the transferred DNA is not fully dehydrated but maintains (irrespective of its formal charge) a significant amount of water around it. Calculations suggest that a neutral DNA state with a compact structure (not too different from that in aqueous solution) is the most prevalent form of DNA in apolar solvent.

Methods

We considered a small oligonucleotide (d(GCGAAGC)) as a model system for all our calculations. In aqueous solution, this small DNA forms a stable hairpin with a GAA triloop and a two-d(C·G)-pair stem, organized in a canonical B-type duplex, as confirmed by NMR.[24] Experiments and theory have shown that this oligonucleotide folds on a (multi)microsecond time scale[25−27] in water, and should unfold on a similar time scale in a denaturant solvent such as pyridine.[22] The small size of the system accelerates calculations, favors sampling, and reduces memory effects, which might be very important for longer oligonucleotides. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of current force field and MD protocols to simulate this structure properly in a variety of environments.[27−29]

Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The 7-mer DNA hairpin was first simulated in aqueous solution as a reference for the “native trajectory”. The NMR structure[24] was neutralized by adding six Na+ ions (placed at optimal classical molecular interaction potential (CMIP) positions[30]) and solvated by 7200 water molecules, defining an octahedral box. The system was optimized, thermalized, and preequilibrated using standard procedures with triplicated simulation windows,[27,31] and equilibrated for 100 ns prior to 1 ms of production trajectory at constant temperature and pressure (T = 300 K; P = 1 atm). Long-range electrostatic corrections were represented by means of periodic boundary conditions (PBC) and the particle mesh Ewald (PME) correction with default parameters.[32] Starting from the aqueous solution equilibrium structure, we performed unbiased MD simulations in CCl4 considering the canonical DNA protonation state (Q = −6) as well as a fully neutralized system, in which all of the phosphates were protonated (Q = 0) following the same procedure used previously for the study of gas-phase structures.[32] The simulation cell contained one DNA molecule and around 4288 CCl4 molecules. The optimization, thermalization, and equilibration procedures were the same as those used in the aqueous simulations. Trajectories were also collected for 1 ms at constant temperature and pressure (T = 300 K; P = 1 atm) using PBC–PME to account for long-range effects. Note that the CCl4-simulation systems do not contain counterions, which means that Ewald’s plasma is responsible for charge balance in these simulations. To discard possible Ewald artifacts in this case, we repeated the calculations for the Q = −6 system using a reaction field correction with a 1.1 nm cutoff to define the boundary between the atomistic system and the exterior dielectric continuum.

Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations

To explore the conformational space of the hairpin in CCl4, we performed replica exchange replica exchange molecular dynamics (RexMD)[33] simulations for the two charge states (Q = −6 and Q = 0) starting from (i) a fully extended conformation and (ii) the aqueous-equilibrated structure. As an additional test, we extended the RExMD simulations to a minimum-hydration hairpin (∼50 water molecules) obtained from our simulations of the transfer of the hairpin from water to CCl4 (see later discussion). A total of 25 temperatures was selected to span the range of 300–440 K. The distribution of temperatures was chosen to guarantee an average exchange probability around 25%. Each of the temperature replicas was explored for 150 ns (for a total simulation time of 2 × 2 × 35 × 0.150 = 15 ms), with exchanges attempted every 1,000 MD steps.

Disconnectivity Graphs

Disconnectivity graphs provide a simple and powerful way to visualize the DNA potential or free energy landscape in terms of local minima and transition states connecting them.[34,35] This approach groups minima that are mutually accessible at a given energy threshold into disjoint sets, which are connected by vertical branches. The shorter the branches linking the minima, the smaller the activation barrier needed to move from one group to the other. The stationary points (minima and transition states) required to construct the disconnectivity graph were obtained with the discrete path sampling (DPS) method,[36,37] implemented in the programs PATHSAMPLE[38] and OPTIM.[39] DPS runs were started from an initial connected path of minima and intervening transition states between two specified end points. To identify suitable end points, we used 400,000 snapshots obtained from MD trajectories at low (298 K) and high (450 K) temperatures for the Q = 0 system in explicit CCl4 (that for which RexMD simulations were not conclusive; see later discussion). Local minimization quenched these snapshots to 687 different local minima. The lowest energy structure was chosen as one representative of the “native form”, while an extended structure without any native contacts was designated as the “unfolded form”. The connections between stationary points were calculated by approximate steepest-descent paths obtained by energy minimization following infinitesimal displacements parallel and antiparallel to the eigenvector corresponding to the unique negative eigenvalue for each transition state. We define minima and transition states as stationary points on the potential energy surface with zero and one negative Hessian eigenvalues, respectively. Local minimization of minima and transition states was carried out using a modified limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Golgfarb–Shano (LBFGS) algorithm.[40,41] The doubly nudged[42] elastic band (DNEB) algorithm[43] was used to identify transition-state candidates, which were accurately refined using a hybrid eigenvector-following approach.[44] Once an initial connected path was found, the database was enlarged by adding all of the minima and transition states found during successive connection-making attempts for existing pairs of minima.[45] The resulting databases contain a total of around 200,000 minima and transition states. Finally, to construct disconnectivity graphs on the basis of free energy, we estimated the relative free energies of minima and transition states from their potential energy and normal-mode frequencies using the harmonic superposition approximation for the density of states.[46] The energy and analytical first derivatives of the energy, required for geometry optimization, were computed through an interface for the AMBER9 package[47] available for OPTIM[39] using the parm99+parmbsc0 force field. For disconnectivity graph calculations we represented the CCl4 solvent with the Generalized Born model implemented in AMBER[48] and without distance cutoffs for the nonbonded interactions.

Steered Molecular Dynamics and Umbrella Sampling Calculations

To obtain an atomistic representation of the transfer of the hairpin from aqueous solution to CCl4, we performed a steered MD simulation,[49] where we moved the hairpin across the major axis of an orthorhombic box (size 5.85 × 5.85 × 19.4 nm3) containing 9,460 CCl4 molecules (placed in the center of the long axis) and 34,935 water molecules (placed at both sides of the CCl4 phase; see Supporting Information Figure S1). Simulations for the Q = −6 DNA included six Na+ counterions (see previous discussion for neutralization protocol), while no explicit counterions were included for the Q = 0 simulations. The steered MD simulations either move the hairpin from one water box to the other passing through the CCl4 phase or from the center of the CCl4 phase to one of the neighboring water boxes. A slow steering velocity [0.05 nm/ns; with force 1,000 kJ/(mol nm2)] was used to reduce hysteresis effects. The steered MD trajectory was then used to extract 75 starting configurations (spaced 0.2 nm along the major axis of the simulation system; see Supporting Information Figure S1) from which umbrella sampling (US) calculations were performed. Prior to the US calculations all configurations selected from the steered MD simulations were relaxed for 20 ns. For the US procedure, we used the position of the DNA hairpin in the transfer direction (z; see Supporting Information Figure S1) as the reaction coordinate, and a harmonic umbrella potential (k = 1,000 kJ/(mol nm2)) with 75 overlapping windows, centered at consecutive values of the reaction coordinate that span the complete water→CCl4→water transfer path. We define the central window as that centered at the center of mass (COM) of the CCl4 box (z = 0 nm) and centered the first and last windows at points located at z = −7.3 and z = +7.3 nm with respect to this COM. Individual trajectories for each of the 75 US windows extend for 100 ns (for a total simulation time of 9 μs × system). The potential of mean force (PMF) was calculated using the cyclic implementation of the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) in GROMACS 4.5.5.[50,51] WHAM incorporates the integrated autocorrelation times (IACT) of umbrella windows. Because IACT is subject to uncertainties due to limited sampling, we have smoothed the IACT along the reaction coordinate using a Gaussian filter of width of 0.5 nm.[50] The statistical uncertainty of the PMFs was estimated using bootstrap analysis.[50]

Poisson–Boltzmann Calculations of the Phase Transfer

We used the finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) equation with a very fine grid resolution[52] as implemented in our CMIP code,[30,52] to determine the change in solvation free energy when the DNA moves from regions of low (CCl4) and high (H2O) dielectrics. Dielectric boundaries were defined from the placement of the interfaces between phases in the US calculations. For each of the 75 windows considered in the US calculations we selected 50 individual DNA conformations (for Q = −6 and Q = 0 states) performing then a total of 15,300 PB calculations from which an average free energy of solvation for each point of the transfer process was determined. To solve the PB equation we used a regular grid (spacing 0.05 nm) with two solvent regions (CCl4 ε = 2 and H2O ε = 80).

Results and Discussion

DNA Hairpin in Water

The d(GCGAAGC) oligonucleotide forms a very stable DNA hairpin in aqueous solution, with a well-organized and stable triloop and a short, but stable, B-GpC DNA stem. The native NMR conformation is stabilized by eight base-pairing hydrogen bonds (H-bonds)[24]—six d(G·C) bonds plus two d(G·A) bonds—that we term “canonical H-bonds”. Despite backbone fluctuations, around 98% of these canonical H-bonds are preserved in the simulation. Our long MD simulations in aqueous solvent suggest that the DNA native hairpin conformation is stable at room temperature (Supporting Information Figure S1), in agreement with previous experimental (root mean square deviation (RMSD) = 0.08 ± 0.01 nm with respect to the NMR average structure) and MD studies.[25−27]

DNA Hairpin in Dry CCl4

Unbiased microsecond MD simulations for the DNA hairpin in CCl4 reveal that for both Q = −6 and Q = 0 charge states the aqueous conformation can survive in CCl4 for a significant amount of time, undergoing only small structural changes (Supporting Information Figure S1). In fact, unbiased MD simulations show RMSD fluctuations smaller for trajectories in CCl4 than for equivalent trajectories (at the same temperature) in water (see Supporting Information Figure S2). Clearly, the ability of water to establish H-bond interactions with the DNA favors flexibility, since in aqueous solution temporarily lost intra-DNA interactions (due to thermal fluctuations) are compensated with DNA–water contacts, while this is impossible in CCl4, or any other apolar environments.[18−20] To verify that the, perhaps surprising, microsecond-scale stability of the Q = −6 hairpin was not related to a PME artifact, we repeated the simulation using a reaction field to correct for distant interactions, instead of the default PBC–PME procedure. As shown in Supporting Information Figure S3 and Figure S1, reaction field and Ewald simulations give (as expected[53]) nearly equivalent results, confirming that aqueous solution structure is indeed a microsecond-stable structure of the hairpin in CCl4, even when no neutralization of the phosphates occurs. It is, however, unclear whether or not the solution structure corresponds to the real free energy minima in CCl4 or it is simply a metastable conformation that becomes trapped due to the stiffness of the structure. To clarify this point, we performed large-scale RexMD simulations with a wide range of temperatures and an aggregated simulation time of more than 15 μs (see Methods and Figure 1a–d). As previously described, to check for memory artifacts, we started simulations from both an “extended” and a “native-like” conformation for the two charged states of the hairpin.
Figure 1

Summary of RexMD results for the dry hairpin in CCl4 solution (Q = −6 and Q = 0) started from the native conformation (the folded state in water) and a fully extended structure. The results correspond to the last 50 ns of the replicas at room temperature (extracted from an aggregated simulation time of 3.75 μs; see Methods).

Irrespective of the starting conformation, both RexMD simulations of the Q = −6 hairpin lead to quite extended configurations at the end of the simulations (Figure 1b). Summary of RexMD results for the dry hairpin in CCl4 solution (Q = −6 and Q = 0) started from the native conformation (the folded state in water) and a fully extended structure. The results correspond to the last 50 ns of the replicas at room temperature (extracted from an aggregated simulation time of 3.75 μs; see Methods). The structures sampled have a significant number of H-bonds, but few of them are native (Figure 1a,b,d). The loop and general hairpin structure is also destroyed, and it is difficult to find any signal of the original hairpin structure in the sampled structures at room temperature (Figure 1). From these RexMD and unbiased MD simulations, we conclude that the native structure is a metastable (on the microsecond time scale) conformation for a hypothetical fully charged hairpin, but it is not the most favorable conformation for this oligonucleotide in CCl4. The results of the RexMD simulations are less clear for the Q = 0 state. By comparing the independent simulations, we conclude that the conformational space is dominated by compact structures (see Figure 1), but it is not clear whether or not these compact structures are close to the native one. Thus, simulations starting from the native state remain very close to the aqueous structure, maintaining the pattern of native H-bonds (Figure 1), while simulations starting from the extended state collapse to a variety of different compact, but nonnative, structures. Clearly, replica exchange seems to be nonoptimal to explore low-lying minima in this complex conformational equilibrium.[54,55] Thus, for the hairpin (Q = 0) we decided to complement RexMD simulations with DPS calculations to build disconnectivity graphs (see Methods). The results in Figure 2 show that the lowest free energy structures correspond to folded hairpins with a high content of native base-pairing (native in blue and near-native in green in this Figure).
Figure 2

Disconnectivity graph for the Q = 0 DNA hairpin. The vertical axis represents the free energy difference with respect to the global minimum, and the spacing of the branches on the horizontal axis was chosen to reveal the structure as clearly as possible. The branches terminate at the energies defined by the individual free energy minima and are joined together at energy thresholds where the barriers separating different sets can be overcome. Branches are colored according to the fraction of native base-pairing H-bond contacts (from no contacts in red to all native contacts in blue) and highlight the diversity of conformations adopted at different energies (unfolded, misfolded, near-native, and native). Selected snapshots colored according to the same order parameter are also shown. The graph reveals that the lowest free energy funnel corresponds to folded structures with a high content of native contacts (blue), and the existence of a funnel of misfolded structures with no native contacts (red) separated from the global minimal by a high free energy barrier.

Disconnectivity graph for the Q = 0 DNA hairpin. The vertical axis represents the free energy difference with respect to the global minimum, and the spacing of the branches on the horizontal axis was chosen to reveal the structure as clearly as possible. The branches terminate at the energies defined by the individual free energy minima and are joined together at energy thresholds where the barriers separating different sets can be overcome. Branches are colored according to the fraction of native base-pairing H-bond contacts (from no contacts in red to all native contacts in blue) and highlight the diversity of conformations adopted at different energies (unfolded, misfolded, near-native, and native). Selected snapshots colored according to the same order parameter are also shown. The graph reveals that the lowest free energy funnel corresponds to folded structures with a high content of native contacts (blue), and the existence of a funnel of misfolded structures with no native contacts (red) separated from the global minimal by a high free energy barrier. The long branches (>30 kJ/mol on the vertical axis) reflect the high-energy barriers associated with rearrangements between native and misfolded or unfolded conformations. Extended (unfolded) states (no native contacts and radius of gyration greater than 0.8 nm, red) are sparse (see Supporting Information Figure S4), and are separated by high-energy barriers from the native state (see Figure 3 and Supporting Information Figure S4). In fact, starting from the unfolded state, we observe that the pathway to the native state involves a potential energy barrier of around 130 kJ/mol (Figure 3). Overall, the disconnectivity graphs confirm that the conformational landscape of the hairpin in CCl4 is very frustrated with several nonnative conformations separated by high-energy barriers. However, the combination of these results with RexMD suggests that compact structures, not far from the aqueous native state, are the dominant ones for the neutral state of the hairpin.
Figure 3

Potential energy difference with respect to the native state as a function of the integrated path length for a discrete path connecting an unfolded structure with the native structure for Q = 0. The integrated path length is the integrated Euclidean distance in Cartesian coordinates high energy. Snapshots for selected intervening structures are also shown and colored according to the fraction of native H-bond base-pairing interactions as described in Figure 2

Potential energy difference with respect to the native state as a function of the integrated path length for a discrete path connecting an unfolded structure with the native structure for Q = 0. The integrated path length is the integrated Euclidean distance in Cartesian coordinates high energy. Snapshots for selected intervening structures are also shown and colored according to the fraction of native H-bond base-pairing interactions as described in Figure 2

Transfer of the DNA Hairpin between Polar and Apolar Phases

Up to this point we have explored the structure of DNA in dry CCl4, but DNA is naturally found in water, and it is therefore interesting to study the transfer process and how it affects the structure and energetics of the hairpin. To study the unlikely transfer process (see Methods), we first performed a very slow velocity steered MD simulation to obtain starting conformations for umbrella sampling free energy calculations. We first pulled the hairpin from one water box to the other, passing through the CCl4 phase (see schematic representation in Supporting Information Figure S5). As seen in Figure 4, even for very small pulling velocities, the hairpin crosses the apolar phase hydrated and maintains the general hairpin structure (see Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6), confirming that the structure of DNA in solution is a metastable conformation in CCl4.
Figure 4

Representation of different snapshots obtained in steered MD simulations forcing the phase transfer of DNA hairpin: (A) from water to CCl4 and back to water for Q = −6 DNA hairpin; (B) from water to CCl4 and back to water for Q = 0 DNA hairpin; (C) from CCl4 to water for the Q = −6 DNA hairpin; (D) from CCl4 to water for the Q = 0 DNA hairpin.

Representation of different snapshots obtained in steered MD simulations forcing the phase transfer of DNA hairpin: (A) from water to CCl4 and back to water for Q = −6 DNA hairpin; (B) from water to CCl4 and back to water for Q = 0 DNA hairpin; (C) from CCl4 to water for the Q = −6 DNA hairpin; (D) from CCl4 to water for the Q = 0 DNA hairpin. The number of water molecules in the microhydration drop depends on the charge state of the hairpin (see Supporting Information Figure S5), but even for the neutral hairpin there is a small, but nonnegligible, number of water molecules protecting the hairpin from the apolar solvent (see Supporting Information Figure S6). Although displacements of the hairpin within the box were as slow as possible, they are still much faster than the relevant experimental time scale, and we cannot rule out potential problems in the relaxation of the solvent environment around the DNA. To avoid these potential relaxation artifacts as far as possible and to confirm that even a neutral hairpin is hydrated in CCl4, we repeated the pulling procedure but started with a dry hairpin placed in the middle of the CCl4 phase. These complementary simulations confirm that as soon as the hairpin moves from the center of the apolar phase, a stream of water molecules flows in (especially dramatic for the Q = −6 charge state), spontaneously generating a microhydration environment (Figure 4). This result indicates that the entrance of water molecules in the apolar phase is not a relaxation artifact but a real physical effect. Hence we predict that under normal conditions a hairpin (especially a fully charged one) would cross a hydrophobic phase surrounded by a small number of water molecules. The discussion in the previous paragraph suggests that if transferred directly from water, the DNA in CCl4 will probably be surrounded by several water molecules. Thus, we repeated the RexMD calculations but used microhydrated species (Q = 0 and Q = −6) obtained from the pulling experiments when the center of mass of the hairpin is placed at the middle of the apolar phase. We found that the impact of the microhydration environment helps to stabilize the folded state (see Supporting Information Figures S7 and S8), shielding the electrostatic repulsion between the charged phosphate groups. As a result, a microhydrated DNA placed in the middle of a CCl4 phase maintains a conformation that is not far away for the native structure in water, even when we consider that phase transfer does not imply change in the ionization state of the oligonucleotide. In summary, our simulations strongly suggest that the neutral hairpin maintains well the solution structure when transferred to either dry or wet CCl4. On the contrary, the fully charged hairpin, while remaining close to the aqueous structure in wet CCl4, is completely unfolded in dry CCl4. We used WHAM and umbrella sampling (from steered-MD snapshots; see Methods) to compute the free energy change associated with the transfer of the hairpin across polar and apolar phases. The results displayed in Figure 5 (see Methods and Supporting Information Figure S9 for details) clearly illustrate the large free energy barrier associated with crossing a hydrophobic phase: around 650 kJ/mol for a fully charged hairpin and 150–200 kJ/mol for the neutral. These numbers are in qualitative agreement with those obtained from a Poisson–Boltzmann calculation (see Figure 6) which demonstrated that transfer of a hairpin from water to an apolar solvent, even if microhydrated, is largely disfavored. These results reinforce the notion that decoration of the DNA with apolar moieties[3−7] is desirable to improve permeation.
Figure 5

Potential of mean force associated with the transfer of the hairpin (Q = −6 and Q = 0) across a polar/apolar/polar simulation box (see Methods and Supporting Information Figure S1).

Figure 6

Change in the electrostatic solvation energy associated with the transfer water→CCl4→water of a fully charged (Q = −6) and neutral (Q = 0) hairpin.

Potential of mean force associated with the transfer of the hairpin (Q = −6 and Q = 0) across a polar/apolar/polar simulation box (see Methods and Supporting Information Figure S1). Change in the electrostatic solvation energy associated with the transfer water→CCl4→water of a fully charged (Q = −6) and neutral (Q = 0) hairpin. Finally, we studied the relative weight of neutral and charged states of a hairpin in CCl4. Using standard thermodynamic cycles (see Supporting Information Figure S10), we computed the free energy cost of transforming a neutral to a charged state in CCl4, the cost of removing the hairpin charge in water, and the cost associated with the phase transfer of the neutral and charged hairpins. The free energy change associated with the annihilation of the hairpin charge can be determined at neutral pH from the experimental pKa in water of a DNA phosphate (pKa around 2; ΔG around 160 kJ/mol assuming that all phosphate groups protonate independently of each other). Thus, transfer of a hairpin (Q = −6) in water into a (Q = 0) hairpin in CCl4 is overall disfavored by around 350 kJ/mol, while the same transfer assuming Q = −6 in both solvents has an associated free energy change around 450–500 kJ/mol higher. In other words, our simulations strongly suggest that DNA in apolar media should have a reduced charge and could even be completely neutral. Under these conditions DNA seems able to maintain its native structure in solution.

Conclusion

DNA is a highly polar molecule, which has evolved over millions of years to be stable and functional in aqueous solution. DNA will not spontaneously transfer to an apolar phase, such as a biological membrane, which represents a clear advantage for confinement in a given cellular compartment. However, biotechnological and biomedical applications often require the DNA to cross biological membranes, be encapsulated in a hydrophobic, environment, or just act as a chemical reactant in a nonaqueous solvent. It is then necessary to study the behavior of nucleic acids in apolar solvents as a preliminary step to design modifications that can favor transfer from water. For this purpose, theoretical approaches are ideal, since they allow us to study DNA in such hostile environments. Our large-scale simulation effort, described in the present report, illustrates the significant changes occurring in the conformational landscape of a small model system of DNA when transferred from water to CCl4. The DNA becomes stiffer and the landscape is more frustrated in the apolar phases, which might generate kinetic traps. Compact states, probably not far from the aqueous structure, are sampled if the DNA is neutralized, while more extended conformations are expected if the DNA maintains its ionic state in water. The transfer of DNA from aqueous solution to CCl4 is energetically disfavored, especially if the DNA maintains its aqueous ionic state. The transfer always occurs with the DNA inside a microdroplet of water. The size of the water droplet increases with the net charge of the DNA, but even for a neutral DNA a significant number of water molecules appears in our simulations for the apolar phase. A combination of the umbrella sampling potential of mean force simulations (supported by Poisson–Boltzmann calculations) with experimental pKa estimates demonstrates that the neutral state is favored, suggesting that transfer of DNA could generate a net proton flux across a membrane. Overall, neutralization of DNA charges seems a key mechanism to improve transfer properties of DNA and either changing phosphoric by another acid with higher pKas or neutralizing decorations neutralizing DNA charge seems a promising approach to improve DNA bioavailability.
  36 in total

1.  Structural stability of DNA in nonaqueous solvents.

Authors:  G Bonner; A M Klibanov
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Configurational diffusion down a folding funnel describes the dynamics of DNA hairpins.

Authors:  A Ansari; S V Kuznetsov; Y Shen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA and RNA in anhydrous media: duplex, triplex, and G-quadruplex secondary structures in a deep eutectic solvent.

Authors:  Irena Mamajanov; Aaron E Engelhart; Heather D Bean; Nicholas V Hud
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 4.  Frontiers in molecular dynamics simulations of DNA.

Authors:  Alberto Pérez; F Javier Luque; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 22.384

5.  Toroidal condensates of semiflexible polymers in poor solvents: adsorption, stretching, and compression.

Authors:  G G Pereira; D R Williams
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding.

Authors:  Z Li; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Solution studies of the nucleic acid bases and related model compounds. Solubility in aqueous alcohol and glycol solutions.

Authors:  T T Herskovits; J P Harrington
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1972-12-05       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Influence of counter-ions on the crystal structures of DNA decamers: binding of [Co(NH3)6]3+ and Ba2+ to A-DNA.

Authors:  Y G Gao; H Robinson; J H van Boom; A H Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Characterizing DNA condensation and conformational changes in organic solvents.

Authors:  Fuyou Ke; Yen Kim Luu; Michael Hadjiargyrou; Dehai Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA and lipid bilayers: self-assembly and insertion.

Authors:  Syma Khalid; Peter J Bond; John Holyoake; Robert W Hawtin; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The structural stability and catalytic activity of DNA and RNA oligonucleotides in the presence of organic solvents.

Authors:  Shu-Ichi Nakano; Naoki Sugimoto
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-01-11

2.  DNA recovery after sequential processing of latent fingerprints on copy paper.

Authors:  Abigail S Bathrick; Sarah Norsworthy; Dane T Plaza; Mallory N McCormick; Donia Slack; Robert S Ramotowski
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 1.717

3.  Long-timescale dynamics of the Drew-Dickerson dodecamer.

Authors:  Pablo D Dans; Linda Danilāne; Ivan Ivani; Tomáš Dršata; Filip Lankaš; Adam Hospital; Jürgen Walther; Ricard Illa Pujagut; Federica Battistini; Josep Lluis Gelpí; Richard Lavery; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Microscopic picture of water-ethylene glycol interaction near a model DNA by computer simulation: Concentration dependence, structure, and localized thermodynamics.

Authors:  Atul Kumar Jaiswal; Rakesh Srivastava; Preeti Pandey; Pradipta Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multifrequency Investigation of Single- and Double-Stranded DNA with Scalable Metamaterial-Based THz Biosensors.

Authors:  Christian Weisenstein; Merle Richter; Anna Katharina Wigger; Anja K Bosserhoff; Peter Haring Bolívar
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  Development of an Automatable Affinity Purification Process for DNA-Encoded Chemistry.

Authors:  Katharina Götte; Robin Dinter; Leon Justen; Norbert Kockmann; Andreas Brunschweiger
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.