Literature DB >> 24965873

A genomic survey of proteases in Aspergilli.

Sebnem Ozturkoglu Budak, Miaomiao Zhou, Carlo Brouwer, Ad Wiebenga, Isabelle Benoit, Marcos Di Falco, Adrian Tsang, Ronald P de Vries1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proteases can hydrolyze peptides in aqueous environments. This property has made proteases the most important industrial enzymes by taking up about 60% of the total enzyme market. Microorganisms are the main sources for industrial protease production due to their high yield and a wide range of biochemical properties. Several Aspergilli have the ability to produce a variety of proteases, but no comprehensive comparative study has been carried out on protease productivity in this genus so far.
RESULTS: We have performed a combined analysis of comparative genomics, proteomics and enzymology tests on seven Aspergillus species grown on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp. Putative proteases were identified by homology search and Pfam domains. These genes were then clusters based on orthology and extracellular proteases were identified by protein subcellular localization prediction. Proteomics was used to identify the secreted enzymes in the cultures, while protease essays with and without inhibitors were performed to determine the overall protease activity per protease class. All this data was then integrated to compare the protease productivities in Aspergilli.
CONCLUSIONS: Genomes of Aspergillus species contain a similar proportion of protease encoding genes. According to comparative genomics, proteomics and enzymatic experiments serine proteases make up the largest group in the protease spectrum across the species. In general wheat bran gives higher induction of proteases than sugar beet pulp. Interesting differences of protease activity, extracellular enzyme spectrum composition, protein occurrence and abundance were identified for species. By combining in silico and wet-lab experiments, we present the intriguing variety of protease productivity in Aspergilli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965873      PMCID: PMC4102723          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Proteases form a complex family of enzymes that possess different catalytic mechanisms with various active sites and divergent substrate specificities [1, 2]. Proteases hydrolyze peptides in aqueous environments [3, 4] and for years this ability has been utilized in industrial processes like food processing, waste treatment, textiles/detergent applications, and photography/chemical processing [5-9]. Proteases can be classified into four major groups: aspartic, cysteine, metallo and serine proteases [2]. Protease inhibitors for each of these classes have been described [10]. These inhibitors regulate the activity of proteases by binding to the enzyme and eliminating unwanted proteolysis [11, 12]. In recent years, proteases and protease inhibitors have gained additional interests in many health related areas as e.g. pathogenic agents by allergy, asthma and obese related illness [13]. Proteases have been recognized as the most important industrial enzymes accounting for about 60% of the total enzyme market [14]. Proteases can be obtained from animal, plant and microbial sources [7]. However, microorganisms are the most important sources for industrial applications [3, 4] due to their high yield and productivity and a wide range of biochemical and catalytic properties [4]. The genus Aspergillus represents a diverse group of filamentous ascomycetous fungi [15], including human, animal and plant pathogens, but also species with a major role in industrial biotechnology [16]. Several Aspergillus species have the ability to produce a variety of proteases [17-22]. In this study we have performed a genome survey of several Aspergilli based on the protein sequences of verified proteases and Pfam domains. Curated putative proteases were fed to a combination of protein subcellular localization (SCL) predictors to identify the potentially secreted proteins. The results of this in silico comparative secretomics were then tested by enzyme activity assays and proteomic experiments on samples from cultures grown on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp. Protease inhibitors were used to determine the contribution of the various protease classes to the total protease activity. Finally, by combining comparative genomes, proteomics and enzymology tests, we demonstrate the intriguing variety of protease productivity in the Aspergilli.

Results

Genome mining and extracellular protein clustering

The genomes of seven Aspergillus species, Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 [23], Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4 [24], Aspergillus oryzae RIB40 [25], Aspergillus flavus NRLL 3357 [26], Aspergillus terreus NIH 2624, Neosartorya fischeri CBS 544.65 [27] and Aspergillus fumigatus AF293 [27] (Table 1, data retrieved from AspGD [28]), were included in the genomic comparison of protease-encoding genes. On the basis of putative protease clusters (588 proteins, 478 clusters) already existing in AspGD, additional putative proteases were found by homology. Gene models were manually corrected by multiple sequence alignments. A thorough Pfam domain detection was carried out on the Aspergillus genomes. Proteins containing no known protease-related Pfam domain(s) were removed when no additional literature support could be found. At the end, 1558 extra putative proteases were added to the original set of AspGD protein clusters by Jaccard [29] and OrthoMCL [30] (in total 2146 proteins, 478 clusters) (Additional file 1). While investigating the gene presence/absence patterns, genome scale ortholog clusters were utilized to identify species-specific genes. 236 out of the 478 clusters appeared to be ubiquitous, by containing at least 1 protein from each species. 56 clusters contained only a single member with no homologs in other species, and were therefore considered “orphan genes” [31, 32]. The other clusters cover the species partially (Additional file 2).
Table 1

Summary of putative proteases in Aspergilli

SpeciesGenome referenceTotal genesPutative proteasesSerine proteasesAspartic proteasesMetallo proteasesAmino proteasesMissellaneous proteases
A. fumigatus Af293 [27]9781301 (45)75 (16)17 (9)48 (8)28 (5)133 (7)
A. flavus NRLL 3357 [26]12604336 (63)88 (23)21 (15)61 (9)24 (4)142 (12)
A. oryzae RIB40 [25]12030336 (57)85 (21)21 (14)66 (11)25 (5)139 (6)
A. terreus NIH 2624 Unpublished10406306 (44)73 (16)18 (9)58 (6)26 (4)131 (9)
N. fischeri CBS 544.65 [27]10406307 (45)76 (15)15 (11)50 (7)26 (4)140 (8)
A. nidulans FGSC A4 [24]10680302 (40)72 (13)16 (8)50 (6)24 (5)140 (8)
A. niger ATCC 1015 [23]11162314 (53)84 (22)19 (15)57 (7)25 (3)129 (6)

The numbers of extracellular proteins are provided in brackets following each category.

Summary of putative proteases in Aspergilli The numbers of extracellular proteins are provided in brackets following each category. Six different protein SCL predictors were applied to all 2146 putative proteases. By using majority vote 335 proteins were considered extracellular, among which 277 were in the original AspGD protease clusters (Additional file 3). Further classification of proteases was determined by combined manual literature search and Pfam annotations. At the end, most putative proteases were classified into four major groups, namely amino, aspartic, metallo and serine, while the remaining genes formed the miscellaneous group (Additional file 1).

Effect of wheat bran and sugar beet pulp on extracellular protease induction in Aspergilli

Two cultivation media, minimal medium with 1% wheat bran (WB) and minimal medium with 1% sugar beet pulp (SBP), were used to induce extracellular protease production in Aspergilli, resulting in an interesting variability of protease activity (Figure 1A). Among the tested species, N. fischeri produced the highest protease activity on SBP, A.fumigatus produced the highest activity on WB whereas A. flavus had the most moderate activities in both substrates. In all cases WB induced more protease activity than SBP. This was particularly true for A. flavus and A. fumigatus, where the extracellular protease activities on WB were around twice as high as those on SBP. In contrast, for N. fisheri only a small difference (<10%) was detected.
Figure 1

Protease activity with and without inhibitor in Aspergilli using WB and SBP as carbon sources. A: Overall protease activity in Aspergilli growing on WB and SBP. Seven Aspergilllus species were grown on WB or SBP on 30°C and sampled at 72 h, protease activities were measured for each sample in 2 biological replications with technical triplicates. B: Protease activity inhibition in Aspergilli. With the same settings described for Figure 1A, the protease activity was measured after adding corresponding inhibitors. The ratio of dropped activity was calculated by PercentageDroppedActivity = [1- (activity after adding inhibitor/original activity without inhibitor)]%. This dropped activity indirectly represents the proportion of corresponding protease activity in the supernatants, higher this number, bigger proportion of such type of protease takes the overall activity. Legends: WB and SBP: protease activity in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively.

Protease activity with and without inhibitor in Aspergilli using WB and SBP as carbon sources. A: Overall protease activity in Aspergilli growing on WB and SBP. Seven Aspergilllus species were grown on WB or SBP on 30°C and sampled at 72 h, protease activities were measured for each sample in 2 biological replications with technical triplicates. B: Protease activity inhibition in Aspergilli. With the same settings described for Figure 1A, the protease activity was measured after adding corresponding inhibitors. The ratio of dropped activity was calculated by PercentageDroppedActivity = [1- (activity after adding inhibitor/original activity without inhibitor)]%. This dropped activity indirectly represents the proportion of corresponding protease activity in the supernatants, higher this number, bigger proportion of such type of protease takes the overall activity. Legends: WB and SBP: protease activity in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively.

Extracellular proteases in 7 Aspergilli confirmed by proteomics

In order to confirm protease production variability by Aspergillus species on different carbon sources, we performed proteomics experiments. In total, 133 putative proteases were identified (at least 2 unique peptides found per protein, Additional file 4). The identified proteases were then mapped to the extended protease clusters created by comparative genomics, resulting in the presence of 45 orthologous groups (OG) in the cultures (Table 2).
Table 2

Putative proteases identified by proteomics in 7 Aspergilli on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp

Ortholog groups A. nidulans A. niger A. oryzae A. terreus A. favus N. fischeri A. fumigatus Protease groupInh.Ref.
OG-1AN2572WS 185799-ATEG_09875WS AFL2G_05512WS NFIA_084570WS Afu2g09030WS AminoB[33]
OG-2AN3918 W 214665W AO090012000110ATEG_09990AFL2G_03045NFIA_032410Afu2g00220W AminoB[34, 35]
OG-3AN6438WS AO090023000602W ATEG_05269W AFL2G_04433WS NFIA_106690Afu4g09320S AminoB[36]
OG-4AN8445WS -AO090003000354WS ATEG_09137WS AFL2G_02631WS NFIA_001250WS Afu3g00650WS AminoB[36]
OG-5AAN1638AO090023000645 ATEG_05313 W AFL2G_04474NFIA_107140Afu4g09030AminoB[37]
OG-5BAN4282130008AO090102000639 ATEG_07980 W AFL2G_10011NFIA_037760Afu5g04330AminoB[36, 38]
OG-6- 206384 W AO090009000228ATEG_03227AFL2G_10434NFIA_049620Afu6g03260AsparticP[17, 39]
OG-7A---- AFL2G_11784 W --AsparticP[40]
OG-7BAN8102189966AO090010000644- AFL2G_04852 W NFIA_002160Afu3g01220AsparticP[17, 40]
OG-8AN4422213261WS AO090023000872ATEG_05510WS AFL2G_04683NFIA_109180Afu4g07040AsparticP[34]
OG-9AN2903W 37080AO090003000693WS ATEG_04676W AFL2G_02316WS NFIA_065900Afu3g11400WS AsparticP[41]
OG-10-40218-ATEG_04955WS -NFIA_065900AsparticP[17, 40]
OG-11A-191956WS AO090009000148ATEG_05628AFL2G_10504W NFIA_051920Afu6g05350AsparticP[39]
OG-11BAN648753364WS AO090701000002ATEG_05628AFL2G_05659NFIA_051920Afu6g05350AsparticP[39]
OG-12-211797WS ---NFIA_100060-AsparticP[40]
OG-13AN6888201655WS AO090120000474ATEG_06182AFL2G_08462NFIA_073740WS Afu5g13300WS AsparticP[42]
OG-14AN6796210782 AO090012000695 W ATEG_09753AFL2G_03570NFIA_040680Afu5g01430CysteineE
OG-15AN7962WS -AO090001000135ATEG_04941WS AFL2G_07373NFIA_102630WS Afu4g13750WS MetalloEd [43, 44]
OG-16-46803AO090011000036WS ATEG_07544WS AFL2G_04842WS NFIA_099860S Afu8g07080WS MetalloEd [45]
OG-17--AO090010000493WS -AFL2G_11655W --MetalloEd [46]
OG-18--AO090011000052WS -AFL2G_04856W --MetalloEd [46]
OG-19AN10540- AO090023000980 WS ATEG_06810-NFIA_110010Afu4g06140MetalloOG-19
OG-20-209872AO090005000457 ATEG_06341 W AFL2G_00447NFIA_027170Afu7g05930MetalloOG-20
OG-21-52703WS --AFL2G_03937WS NFIA_033550WS Afu2g01250WS SerineOG-21[39, 47]
OG-22A-55493WS AO090026000083-AFL2G_07153--SerinePm [39]
OG-22B-55133WS -----SerinePm [39]
OG-23AN627352126AO090026000357WS ATEG_01242AFL2G_06902WS NFIA_087760Afu2g12630SerinePm [48]
OG-24-46979WS AO090020000351ATEG_07509AFL2G_10957NFIA_047470Afu6g00310SerinePm [49, 50]
OG-25-54734WS -----SerinePm [34]
OG-26-43917-ATEG_06406W -NFIA_072360Afu5g14610SerinePm
OG-27AN255556161WS AO090010000534ATEG_09537WS AFL2G_11692NFIA_035860Afu2g03510WS SerinePm [39, 51]
OG-28A-55665WS AO090166000084WS -AFL2G_09418WS NFIA_102320Afu4g14000SerinePm [52]
OG-28B-52700WS -----SerinePm [52]
OG-29AN544252603AO090103000332ATEG_03401AFL2G_12064 NFIA_059500 W Afu6g13540SerinePm [34]
OG-30AN7231WS 56689WS AO090102000079WS ATEG_10012WS AFL2G_09533WS NFIA_092750W Afu2g17330W SerinePm [39]
OG-31AN1426WS 214460WS AO090103000026WS ATEG_00024WS AFL2G_12331WS NFIA_096830WS Afu1g00420SerinePm [53]
OG-32AN10030140344AO090020000517ATEG_06546W AFL2G_10813NFIA_078120Afu5g09210W SerinePm [40]
OG-33AN2237WS 192619AO090701000220WS ATEG_09343WS AFL2G_05864WS NFIA_079940W Afu5g07330SerinePm
OG-34AN7159W 211032WS AO090011000235WS ATEG_02150WS AFL2G_05009WS NFIA_029950WS Afu4g03490WS SerinePm [54]
OG-35--AO090701000579WS -AFL2G_06196WS --SerinePm
OG-36-----NFIA_031000Afu7g08350WS SerinePm
OG-37AN2818W 180130AO090103000478-AFL2G_11938--SerineC
OG-38 AN1182 WS 208263AO090038000317ATEG_00287 AFL2G_07674 W NFIA_014730Afu1g10910SerinePm [38, 55]
OG-39AN2366WS -AO090023000609WS ATEG_05749AFL2G_04440WS --t-serineA[56]
OG-40AN5558WS 203039AO090003001036WS ATEG_03900W AFL2G_01995WS NFIA_104430W Afu4g11800t-serineA[42, 57]
OG-41AN022435620 AO090023000428 W ATEG_05010 W AFL2G_04274 W NFIA_057190Afu6g11500t-serineA
OG-42AN5129181371AO090012000995 ATEG_10178 W AFL2G_03855 WS NFIA_081390W Afu1g07440UbiquitinU[5759]
OG-43AAN0687207954 AO090012000528 WS ATEG_00551 WS AFL2G_03425 WS NFIA_012010 Afu1g13490 W UbiquitinU[45]
OG-43B AN2000 WS 214265W AO090003001182 WS ATEG_00694AFL2G_01863W NFIA_105720Afu4g10350UbiquitinU[60]
OG-44AN7254205183AO090102000107 ATEG_10033 W AFL2G_09558 W NFIA_092420Afu2g17110UbiquitinU[61]
OG-45AN401652026AO090003000947 ATEG_03809 W AFL2G_02080NFIA_020680Afu1g04040UbiquitinU[62]

The proteases found in both WB and SBP are markedWS, the ones only found in WB are markedW and the ones only found in SBP are markedS. Putative non-extracellular proteins detected by proteomics are in italics. Orthologous proteases are clustered and mentioned in the first column. Absence of orthologs in each species are resembled by “-”.

Abbreviations: B Bestatin, P Pepstatin, E E-64/L-cysteine, E EDTA, Pm: AEBSF/DFP/PMSF, C Calyculin A, A Aprotinin/Antipain, U Ubiquitinyl hydrolase 1, T-serine, trypsin-like serine.

Putative proteases identified by proteomics in 7 Aspergilli on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp The proteases found in both WB and SBP are markedWS, the ones only found in WB are markedW and the ones only found in SBP are markedS. Putative non-extracellular proteins detected by proteomics are in italics. Orthologous proteases are clustered and mentioned in the first column. Absence of orthologs in each species are resembled by “-”. Abbreviations: B Bestatin, P Pepstatin, E E-64/L-cysteine, E EDTA, Pm: AEBSF/DFP/PMSF, C Calyculin A, A Aprotinin/Antipain, U Ubiquitinyl hydrolase 1, T-serine, trypsin-like serine. From all identified proteins, 93 were found on both WB and SBP, while 38 were found uniquely on WB and only two (dipeptidyl-peptidase Afu4g09320 [51, 63] and neutral protease I NFIA_099860) were found uniquely on SBP. Twenty-five out of these 133 identified proteases were not predicted to be extracellular according to our combined SCL predictions. Some of them may be secreted through alternative (non-classical) secretion systems, as suggested for the spermidine synthase (AO090012000528) from A. oryzae. While comparing proteomics-confirmed protein productivities to enzymology-identified protease activities, a strong correlation was found: WB generally induced more proteases than SBP with all tested Aspergillus species taking protein occurrence, abundance and enzyme activities all in consideration (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Correlation of protease occurrence, abundance and activity in Aspergilli on WB or SBP. While growing on 2 different crude substrates (on 30°C and sampled at 72 h), the protease occurrence, abundance and the enzyme activity of seven tested Aspergillus strains show a general positive correlation. In WB more occurrences of proteases with higher abundance have been identified than in SBP, so as the enzyme activities. The protease abundance is presented in this figure by spectral counts, the amount of identified proteins which is presented in the figure by framed numbers. Legends: WB and SBP: protease activity in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively; WBP and SBPP: Protease abundance in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively.

Correlation of protease occurrence, abundance and activity in Aspergilli on WB or SBP. While growing on 2 different crude substrates (on 30°C and sampled at 72 h), the protease occurrence, abundance and the enzyme activity of seven tested Aspergillus strains show a general positive correlation. In WB more occurrences of proteases with higher abundance have been identified than in SBP, so as the enzyme activities. The protease abundance is presented in this figure by spectral counts, the amount of identified proteins which is presented in the figure by framed numbers. Legends: WB and SBP: protease activity in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively; WBP and SBPP: Protease abundance in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively. Intriguingly, contradictions were also found when delving deeper into the protease production profile of individual species. For example, A. terreus has the second largest amount of proteases identified in WB (24) whereas only 11 proteins were found in SBP. However, the protease activity in SBP was only around 20% less than in WB (Additional file 4). In N. fischeri a lower than average number of proteins was detected by proteomics, but the protease activity was amongst the highest of all species. In A. fumigatus only 3 additional proteins (15% extra quantity by spectral counts) were identified in WB compared to SBP, but the overall protease activity in WB was 40% higher. These findings demonstrate that the total protease activity does not only depend on the total production of proteases. This is likely due to the fact that the enzyme assays measure the combined activity of the available proteases. As they have different specific activities, the total activity is not equal to the sum of the protein amount. For instance, high abundance of a protease with a low specific activity may affect the overall protease activity less than moderate abundance of a protease with a high specific activity.

Closer examination of the produced protease activity using protease inhibitors

In order to elucidate the extracellular protease composition in more detail, a series of inhibitor specificity tests was performed. Most of the proteases that were identified in Aspergilli could be classified into the following major groups: amino, aspartic, metallo and serine. Based on literature, the main inhibitor of each group was Bestatin [64, 65], Pepstatin [66-68], Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) [69, 70] and phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride (PMSF) [71], respectively (Table 2, Additional file 4). These inhibitors were added to the supernatants and protease activities were compared to those without inhibitors (Additional file 5).In general, for all samples protease activity was found to be inhibited predominantly by PMSF (43.48-67.12% decrease of activity). Lesser inhibition of activity was detected with EDTA (1.56-40.05%), Bestatin (1.29-14.92%) and Pepstatin (2.24-28.40%) (Figure 1B). For PMSF inhibition the ratio of decrease was similar in all species (55 ± 12%), even though A. niger has the lowest overall protease activity and N. fischeri one of the highest (Figure 1 and Additional file 5). No significant difference of PMSF inhibited activities was found between WB and SBP in A. oryzae, A. nidulans, A. terreus, N. fischeri and A. niger. Although the occurrence and abundance of serine proteases were different in the samples, PMSF inhibited around half of the protease activity in all samples (Figure 1B, Additional file 5). Nevertheless, some of the prevalently produced serine protease clusters may be responsible for at least half of total enzyme activity in these species regardless of carbon source differences. Examples could be OG-30 that contains the lysosomal Pro-Xaa carboxypeptidase ProtA (56689) [39, 47], OG-31 that contains the dipeptidyl peptidase II (214460) [39], OG-33 that contains the carboxypeptidase CpyI (AO090701000220) [53] and OG-34 that contains the tripeptidyl-peptidase TppA (AO090011000235) [54] (Table 2). In contrast, A. fumigatus and A. flavus showed noticeable inhibition differences depending on the growth substrate. In A. flavus inhibition of serine proteins on WB showed a 50% higher effect than that on SBP. The opposite was observed for A. fumigatus where SBP seemed to promote more serine-protease activity than WB (Figure 1B and Figure 3).
Figure 3

Correlation for each subgroup of protease by occurrence and activity in Aspergilli on WB or SBP (growing on 30°C and sampled at 72 h). The protein occurence is presented by the percentage of serine, metallo, aspartic and amino proteases in all proteomics-identified proteases, respectively. The proportion of serine, metallo, aspartic and amino proteases is presented by the percentage of inhibited enzyme activity by adding PMSF, EDTA, pepsatin and bestatin (PercentageDroppedActivity = [1- (activity after adding inhibitor/original activity without inhibitor)]% as in Figure 2). The occurrence of corresponding protease in the spectrum was calculated by AmountSpecificProtease/AmontTotalProtease%. Legends: WB and SBP: Proportion of specific protease activity in the spectrum while growing on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively; WBPV and SBPPV: percentage of protease occurrence in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively.

Correlation for each subgroup of protease by occurrence and activity in Aspergilli on WB or SBP (growing on 30°C and sampled at 72 h). The protein occurence is presented by the percentage of serine, metallo, aspartic and amino proteases in all proteomics-identified proteases, respectively. The proportion of serine, metallo, aspartic and amino proteases is presented by the percentage of inhibited enzyme activity by adding PMSF, EDTA, pepsatin and bestatin (PercentageDroppedActivity = [1- (activity after adding inhibitor/original activity without inhibitor)]% as in Figure 2). The occurrence of corresponding protease in the spectrum was calculated by AmountSpecificProtease/AmontTotalProtease%. Legends: WB and SBP: Proportion of specific protease activity in the spectrum while growing on wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively; WBPV and SBPPV: percentage of protease occurrence in wheat bran and sugar beet pulp, respectively. EDTA was the second best inhibitor, but a large variation of inhibited activity was detected (1.56-40.05%). A. terreus and A. oryzae showed the highest activity inhibition in WB samples. A. nidulans also showed a significant inhibition effect (~20%), though only a small difference between WB and SBP was detected. The enzyme activity in these species did not show strong correlation to their protease profiles. In A. terreus minor amounts of metallo proteases were identified by the proteomics experiments. The spectral counts in WB were comparatively lower than in SBP, even though the activity inhibition was much higher in WB than in SBP, suggesting higher specific activity of metallo proteases present in WB. Alkaline protease AN7962 [43] was the only metallo protease detected in A. nidulans cultures by proteomics. The spectral counts of this protein in WB were two-fold higher than in SBP. EDTA showed an equal effect on this protein with both substrates. In A. oryzae the main metallo proteases identified were neutral protease I (AO090011000036), neutral protease II (AO090010000493) and the leucine aminopeptidase (AO090011000052) [45]. They showed higher total abundance in WB than SBP, and the inhibition effects confirmed this. Among all species, A.oryzae and A.niger showed the highest activity inhibition when pepstatin was added to the supernatant produced with WB, indicating the presence of aspartic proteins in these species.In A. niger Aspergillopepsin A (PepA, 201655) [42] was found to be the most dominant protease, with a four-fold higher abundance in WB than in SBP. Bestatin mainly inhibits the activity of amino-protease/peptidases. Adding Bestatin to the supernatants showed minor inhibition of protease activities (<10%). This was intriguing because a rather high presence of amino proteases was identified in A. terreus, A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. flavus and N. fischeri by proteomics. The putative aminopeptidase OG-4 [33, 36] (AN8445, AO090003000354, ATEG_09137, AFL2G_02631, NFIA_001250, and Afu3g00650) was the most abundant amino protease regardless of the carbon source in all species except A. niger (Figure 3).

Discussion

We have performed sets of heterogeneous tests on Aspergillus species using two complex substrates as carbon sources, aiming to construct a snapshot of fungal life that reflects the variation in protease productivity in different species. In contrast to commonly reported genome-scale protease analysis results [27, 48, 62], besides comparative genomics and proteomics we also included the analysis of enzymatic measurements, which provided further elucidation on the composition of extracellular protease spectra. By comparative genomics, a rather even distribution (around 3%) of putative proteases was detected in Aspergillus genomes despite genome size variations (Table 1). Among species, the proportions of proteins in each specific subgroup were also consistent, namely 25 ± 1% serine, 18 ± 1% metallo, 8 ± 1% amino and 5% aspartic proteases. Further ortholog clustering revealed only a very low number of extracellular “orphan” genes (9 putatively extracellular genes that have no homologs in the other six species included in this analysis). In fact, more than 60% of the extracellular putative proteases clusters were found to be ubiquitous by containing at least one gene per species. Moreover, the major extracellular protease regulator PrtT was also found to have a single presence per Aspergillus genome (except for A. nidulans) [51, 72–75]. This might have brought assumptions that in during evolution, moderate divergence of protease genes has occurred in this genus since most of the encoding genes were well conserved at sequence level and only a small number of species-specific genes was identified. If this hypothesis applies, the production rate of extracellular proteases in all Aspergillus species should follow the distribution of encoded genes and have similar influence of the regulator prtT, meaning even protein count and quantitative measurement should be detected by proteomics. However, large variations in protein occurrence and abundance were found, indicating more profound mechanisms might be playing important roles. For example, A. flavus and N. fischeri contain almost identical percentages of putative extracellular proteases in the genomes, but when cultivated on the same carbon sources a double amount of proteases and even higher abundance were identified in A. flavus. Should the protease productivity in Aspergilli follow the distribution of protease encoding genes, the production of each specific subgroup of protease would be consistent among categories and species. Indeed at least one semi-ubiquitous protease ortholog group of genes were identified for each sub-category of proteases on at least one of the substrates, such as OG-4 (lap2 amino protease, AN8445) [36], OG-9 (pepE aspartic protease, AN2903) [41], OG-16 (neutral metallo protease I, AO090011000036) [45] and OG-30 (ProtA serine protease, 56689) [39]. Moreover, a larger number of serine proteases were identified in all species, which correlates with the serine protease encoding genes being the largest subgroup of proteases in Aspergilli. However when quantitative measurements (abundance) were taken into account this correlation was absent because the most abundant individual proteases were never in the serine group, neither did the sum of abundances of the total serine group per species make this the dominant group (Additional file 4). In A. flavus (AFL2G_02631), A. fumigatus (Afu3g00650), and A. oryzae (AO090003000354) the most abundant protease belong to the amino protease group, while in A. nidulans (AN7962) and A. terreus (ATEG_04941) the most abundant proteases were metallo proteases. In the other species aspartic proteases (201655 and NFIA_073740) were more abundant. Taking A. niger as an example, the highest amount of serine proteases were indeed identified in the supernatant. However, based on comparative genomics the second most abundant group should be the metallo proteases, but no metallo protease was detected by proteomics on either substrate, which could possibly indicate that some of the proteases of the other classes also require metal ions [76, 77]. The second most abundant group detected in A. niger were the aspartic proteases, including pepA (213261) [34], opsA (211797) [40] and opsB (53364) [39]. This demonstrated that even on the same substrate protease occurrence and abundance in Aspergillus species can differ significantly. Although in industrial applications the productivity of proteases usually refers to the production rate of proteases per time per unit, in this study we aim to construct a snapshot of Aspergilli life style which reflects the protease production mechanisms, therefore the productivity measurements of proteases did not only include the occurrence or abundance of proteins but also the enzyme activities. Summarizing the comparison results of genomics, proteomics and enzymology tests, a general trend was detected. WB induced higher total protease activity, richer proteomics profiles and more protein abundance than SBP. This strongly suggests that in Aspergilli, carbon source difference is the most important factor that influences protease productivity (see Additional file 6 for monosaccharide composition of WB and SBP and [78] for the composition of amino acids). This was further confirmed by the fact that using glucose (minimal medium +3% glucose) or glucose plus casein (minimal medium +1% glucose + 1% casein) only low protease induction could be detected in A. nidulans while sampled at the same time point as the WB or SBP cultures (data not shown). While outside the scope of this study, it should be mentioned that it has been frequently reported that proteases are largely produced upon environment-induced cell lysis/damage [38], especially with sugar or nitrogen depletion [33, 36, 79, 80]. In our analysis, WB-based substrates showed higher protease activity as well as profiles than SBP-based substrates. This may indicate that WB cultivation resulted in a faster growth rate and earlier sugar depletion, and has therefore promoted an earlier production of proteases [36, 81]. To further reveal the mechanisms behind Aspergillus protease productivity, aspects such as sugar consumption and fungal growth rate should be taken into account in future studies. Besides amino, aspartic, metallo and serine proteases, a certain amount of ubiquitin and trypsin proteases were also detected by proteomics. The specificity of these proteases was not tested due to the unavailability of inhibitor kits. Although very low abundance was found for these proteins, these proteins may also take part in the total extracellular protease activity in Aspergilli. Other factors may also cause variability between individual Aspergillus species. pH has been reported to be one of these factors [46, 82, 83] and some of the data of this study supports this assumption. For example, AN6888 (pepA) has been reported to be an acidic protease [42] and was not detected in A. nidulans (pH 7 on WB and 8 on SBP). In contrast, the ortholog of this protein in A. niger (201655) had high abundance (pH = 5-6) [39, 49, 75, 80]. Finally, even though 6 well known protein SCL predictors were employed in order to guarantee the accuracy of extracellular protease prediction, improvements could still be made for secretome prediction. Among all six used tools the prediction rate varied largely. The WoLF-PSORT prediction fitted best with the proteomics results, while Multi-LOC was most different from this (data not shown). Interestingly, although with low area abundance 25 proteases were detected extracellularly by proteomics that lack a translocation signal peptide. Most of them were found in A. flavus and A.terreus (7 proteins each species), 3 were found in A. oryzae and the rest disseminated among the other species. If this was not caused by cell lysis or leakage, these proteins can be considered as indications of alternative secretion systems in Aspergilli. Hardly any of these proteins were correctly predicted by the SCL predictors we used. Hence, this study may also be of value as a testing or training set to improve currently existing prediction methods.

Conclusions

We have performed a series of in silico and biological experiments to gain understanding of protease production in Aspergilli. According to the results of comparative genomics Aspergillus species contain a similar proportion of protease encoding genes with serine proteases as the biggest group. The proteomics and enzymatic experiments generally confirm this composition, as serine proteases indeed make up the largest subcategory in the protease spectrum across the species. Furthermore, taking carbon source differences into account, wheat bran resulted in a higher induction of proteases than sugar beet pulp. An interesting variation of total protease activity, composition of the protease spectrum, and their abundance were observed between the species. The broadest set of proteases was found in A. flavus, while the highest overall protease abundance was found in A. niger, and the highest protease activity was detected for A. fumigatus in wheat bran and for N.fischeri in sugar beet pulp. It is very likely that even cultivated in an identical environment, the tested Aspergillus species were experiencing different physiology when sampled at the same time point. Concerning the high protein sequence conservation level (1E-20, sequence coverage 85%) among clustered proteases, it is likely that the variation of protease productivity is caused by more complicated mechanisms such as gene regulation related to environmental changes by carbon source differences [35, 44, 46] but not by enzymatic differences between the orthologous proteases themselves.

Methods

Genome mining, clustering and extracellular protein prediction

The genome sequences were extracted from AspGD [28] (version May 2014). Used genome information is listed in Table 1. The pre-calculated protease clusters in AspDG were retrieved from the Aspergillus10-way-comparative database. Additional homologs were added to the clusters by homolog searches using majority vote of BLASTP [84], Jaccard [29] (cutoff E-value e-20 and alignment coverage 85%) and OrthoMCL[85] (E-value 1E-10, inflation level 1 and sequence coverage 40%) results. Gene models were double checked with manual curation combining literature searches. Six protein subcellular localization (SCL) predictors, Phobius [86], SignalP [87], PrediSi [88], CELLO [89], MultiLOC [90] and WoLF-PSORT [91, 92] were used to predict the extracellular proteases. Default settings of each SCL predictor were used, with the species parameter as “Eukaryotic” or “Fungi”. Majority votes were applied to combine the results of each SCL prediction.

Protease inhibitor information extraction and other bioinformatics analysis

The specific enzyme inhibitor information was retrieved by AspGD gene annotation repository and literature researches. Protein functional domain prediction was performed by HMMER v.3.0 [93] using the complete Pfam-A and Pfam-B models [94] (data retrieved from Pfam database, version November 2012) with the trust cutoff and the gathering cutoff. The resulting Pfam predictions were pooled.

Strains and media

The fungal strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains were grown on Malt Extract Agar and incubated at 30°C for 3–4 days until good sporulation had occurred. Spores were harvested by gentle agitation in 10 ml ACES (acid buffer) and solutions were taken into sterile tubes. Twenty times dilution of each solution were counted using a haemocytometer (Burker-Turk) under microscope (Axioplan, Zeiss). Liquid media was prepared in 250 ml conical flasks containing 50 ml Minimal medium (MM) [95]. Five different culture conditions were prepared for the determination of protease activity in different mediums. Below substrates were added into 250 ml conical flasks containing 50 ml MM and a) 1% wheat bran, b) 1% wheat bran +1% glucose, c) 1% sugar beet pulp, d) 1% glucose + 1% sugar beet pulp and e) 1% glucose + 1% casein. All prepared media were autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min. For each strain, sterile liquid culture media were inoculated with 5× 108 spore/ml in 250 ml erlenmeyer flask and incubated for 72 h at 30 0C on a shaker at 250 rpm for the production of proteases. During the growth of fungi, 2 ml of aliquots were taken from cultures at 48 h, 72 h and 96 h. Those were centrifuged and used for all the experiments. Cultures were established in duplication for biological repetition and triplicated for technical repetition. The pH of most samples on was 7 except for A. nidulans on SBP (pH = 8) and A. niger on WB (pH = 5-6) and SBP (pH = 4-5).

Protease activity assay

A pilot experiment was performed on A.nidulans growing on WB, WB + Glc, SBP and SBP + Glc and protease activities were measured on 48, 72 and 96 h post-inoculation. From the analysis the best day with highest protease activity was found to be day 3 (72 h post-inoculation, Additional file 7). For all experiments, protease activities of the cultures were measured after 72 h post-inoculation in liquid-state fermentation. 2 ml samples were taken from flasks and centrifuged at 14000 × ρ for 10 min (Eppendorf Centrifuge, 5417R). Supernatant was separated after centrifugation and stored at -20°C until the measurements of protease activity. The protease activity assay was performed according to the procedures mentioned in protocol of Pierce Fluorescent Protease Assay Kit (Kit number: 23266, Pierce Biotechnology, Thermo Scientific, USA). The levels of protease activity in the supernatants of 7 strains over 72 h were compared using a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled casein assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescence of the samples were measured by optical density (OD) using the plate reader (Fluostar Optima, BMG LABTECH) with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 530 nm to determine protease activity. The enzyme activity was expressed as micromoles of trypsin released per minute per milligram of total protein in culture filtrate (unit: U/mg, 1 μmol trypsin min-1). pH 7.2 was required for the Pierce in light of the TBS solution stability. A pilot experiment was performed testing this kit on pH 4, 6, and 8 (Additional file 8). According to the result of this test, pH 6 was selected for protease activity measurements.

Inhibition of proteases

Protease inhibitors were prepared to give final concentrations of 50 mM for PMSF and EDTA (Sigma), 1 mM for Pepstatin A and Bestatin (Sigma) as instructed by the manufacturer. 2 μL protease inhibitors were added into the assay mixture and incubated for 60 min at room temperature prior to performing the assay. Culture supernatants treated alone was used as negative control. Each assay was performed in triplicate. All measurements were performed under pH 6.

Neutral carbohydrate composition

Neutral carbohydrate composition of wheat straw and sugar beet pulp was analysed according to Englyst [96] using inositol as an internal standard. Samples were treated with 72% (w/w) H2SO4 (1 h, 30°C) followed by hydrolysis with 1 M H2SO4 for 3 h at 100°C and the constituent sugars released were derivatised and analysed as their alditol acetates using gas chromatography (GC).

Proteomics experiments

Protein digestion

Protein from 3 ml of incubation medium was precipitated with cold TCA/Acetone. Protein sample determination was carried out with the RCDC kit assay (BioRad, Mississauga, Ont). Five ug. of protein was incubated in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 0.1% AALS II (Morgantown, WV) and 5 mM dithiothreitol for 30 min. followed by the addition of Iodoacetamide to a final 25 mM concentration and incubated for an additional 30 min at 37 Deg. C. 200 ng of trypsin was added to each sample and the solution totaling 70 ul was incubated for 18 hr at 37 deg C. The digestion solutions were acidified with trifluoroacetic acid (1% final) then put through two rounds of desalting using C18 ziptips™ (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Eluted peptides were dried in a SpeedVac and resuspended in a 60 ul solution of 5% ACN, 0.1% FA and 4fmol/ul of predigested Bovine Serum Albumin (Michrom, Auburn, CA) used as an internal standard.

LC-MS/MS analysis

Five ul of peptide digest was loaded onto 15 cm × 75 μm i.d PicoFrit column (New Objective, Woburn, MA) packed with Jupiter 5 μm, 300 Å, C18 resin (Phenomemex, Torrance, CA) connected in-line with a Velos LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher, San Jose, CA). Peptide separation was done using a linear gradient generated by an Easy-LC II Nano-HPLC system (Thermo-Fisher) using a mixture of solvent A (3% ACN:0.1% FA) and solvent B (99.9% ACN:0.1%FA). The gradient started at 1% B, was set to reach 27% B in 85 min, ramped to 52% B in 15 min and 90% B in 5 min then held at 90% for 5 min. The mass spectrometer used was a Velos LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo-Fisher, San Jose, CA). The capillary voltage on the nanospray source was adjusted to get the best spraying plume at 10% B and typically ranged from 1.9 to 2.1 kV. MS survey scan spanning the 350 to 2000 m/z range was done at 60000 resolution. The top 10 doubly, triply or quadruply charged ions with intensity higher that 5000 counts were considered candidates to undergo CID MS/MS fragmentation in the LTQ-Velos ion trap. Quantification was based on MS precursor ion signal using the precursor ion detection workflow from Proteome Discoverer Quant 1.3 (Thermo-Fisher). Briefly, extracted ion chromatograms were generated to compute the peptide area value associated to each identified precursor ion. A Protein Area value is subsequently calculated as the average of the three most intense, distinct, peptides assigned to a protein. Protein area values were expressed as a fold value of the protein area value calculated for Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) which was spiked as an internal standard in each individual sample. For spectral count-based comparisons, the number of assigned spectra for each protein was reported as a fold value of the total number of spectra assigned to BSA in each sample.

Bioinformatics data processing

LC-MSMS data was processed using Proteome Discoverer Quant 1.3 (Thermo-Fisher) and spectral data was searched against Aspergillus protein databases downloaded from the Aspergillus Genome Database (AspGD). Search parameters used were 0.80 Da for fragment ion tolerance of and 10.0 ppm for parent ion tolerance, fixed iodoacetamide cysteine modification and variable methionine oxidation. Quantification was based on MS precursor ion signal using the precursor ion detection workflow from Proteome Discoverer Quant 1.3 (Thermo-Fisher). Briefly, extracted ion chromatograms were generated to compute the peptide area value associated to each identified precursor ion. A Protein Area value is subsequently calculated as the average of the three most intense, distinct, peptides assigned to a protein. Protein area values were expressed as a fold value of the protein area value calculated for Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) which was spiked as an internal standard in each individual sample. For spectral count-based comparisons, the number of assigned spectra for each protein was reported as a fold value of the total number of spectra assigned to BSA in each sample. Confidence filters were applied to satisfy a 1% FDR at the Peptide and Protein level. Protein grouping was applied so as to satisfy the principles of parsimony. The normalized protein areas of a protein were used as the measurement of abundance level of the protein. The abundance of a protein represents the productivity of the protein in an organism under that specific circumstance while measured. The areas are also used as the measurement of protease productivity. The unique counts of peptides to each identified protein were used as evidences of the occurrence of the protein. For any protein that has more than one uniquely mapped peptide it is considered occurred in the supernatant. The total amount/number of proteases in a sample was calculated by the sum of proteins which have more than one uniquely mapped peptide. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository [97] with the dataset identifier PXD000982.

Availability of supporting data

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository [97] with the dataset identifier PXD000982. Additional file 1: The putative protease clusters in seven Aspergilli species. The subcellular localization prediction, protease family classification, Pfam domain prediction and functional annotation of each protein are listed. The proteins found in the original AspGD are marked bold. (XLS 607 KB) Additional file 2: The "Orphan" proteases in 7 Aspergilli. The "Orphan" proteases in 7 Aspergilli, together with their subcellular localization prediction, protease family classification, Pfam domain prediction and functional annotation. (XLS 38 KB) Additional file 3: The subcellular localization prediction on putative proteases. Using majority vote the compartment of the proteins was predicted by 6 different tools. (XLS 416 KB) Additional file 4: The proteomics identification of proteases. Description of data: the proteomics identification of protease in Aspergilli with SBP and WB respectively. Both ion count and spectral counts are provided. (XLS 86 KB) Additional file 5: The original protease activity measurements without and with inhibitors. Description of data: Two batches of biological replicates were measured with triplicated technical replicates of each sample, the triplicates were corrected by blanco and the mean/standard deviation values are listed in the table. (XLS 50 KB) Additional file 6: The monosaccharide composition of wheat bran and sugar beet pulp. (XLS 10 KB) Additional file 7: The time series enzyme activity measurements of on day 2, 3 and 4. The protease activity and inhibition tests were measured under pH 7.2 (recommended by manufacturer), on 48, 72 and 96 h post-inoculation. (XLS 28 KB) Additional file 8: The pH optimization pilot test with protease activity measurements. The protease activity was measured under pH 7.2 (recommended by manufacturer), 4, 6 and 8. pH 6 was used to perform further experiments for less bias was caused. (XLS 12 KB)
  89 in total

1.  In silico characterization of alkaline proteases from different species of Aspergillus.

Authors:  Vivek Kumar Morya; Sangeeta Yadav; Eun-Ki Kim; Dinesh Yadav
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.926

2.  Different control mechanisms regulate glucoamylase and protease gene transcription in Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state and submerged fermentation.

Authors:  R te Biesebeke; N van Biezen; W M de Vos; C A M J J van den Hondel; P J Punt
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  The distinctive regulatory roles of PrtT in the cell metabolism of Penicillium oxalicum.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Gen Zou; Lei Zhang; Ronald P de Vries; Xing Yan; Jun Zhang; Rui Liu; Chengshu Wang; Yinbo Qu; Zhihua Zhou
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae alters ambient pH, allowing extracellular protease production and activity.

Authors:  R J St Leger; J O Nelson; S E Screen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Analysis of two Aspergillus nidulans genes encoding extracellular proteases.

Authors:  P A vanKuyk; B F Cheetham; M E Katz
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.495

6.  Spatial differentiation in the vegetative mycelium of Aspergillus niger.

Authors:  Ana M Levin; Ronald P de Vries; Ana Conesa; Charissa de Bekker; Manuel Talon; Hildegard H Menke; Noel N M E van Peij; Han A B Wösten
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-10-19

7.  Modulation of pulmonary leukotriene formation and perfusion pressure by bestatin, an inhibitor of leukotriene A4 hydrolase.

Authors:  D T Muskardin; N F Voelkel; F A Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07-05       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Salt-tolerant and thermostable alkaline protease from Bacillus subtilis NCIM no. 64.

Authors:  A A Kembhavi; A Kulkarni; A Pant
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.926

9.  Proteomic analysis of the secretory response of Aspergillus niger to D-maltose and D-xylose.

Authors:  José Miguel P Ferreira de Oliveira; Mark W J van Passel; Peter J Schaap; Leo H de Graaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  FunSecKB: the Fungal Secretome KnowledgeBase.

Authors:  Gengkon Lum; Xiang Jia Min
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  15 in total

1.  Glucose-Mediated Repression of Plant Biomass Utilization in the White-Rot Fungus Dichomitus squalens.

Authors:  Paul Daly; Mao Peng; Marcos Di Falco; Anna Lipzen; Mei Wang; Vivian Ng; Igor V Grigoriev; Adrian Tsang; Miia R Mäkelä; Ronald P de Vries
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Spatial differentiation of gene expression in Aspergillus niger colony grown for sugar beet pulp utilization.

Authors:  Isabelle Benoit; Miaomiao Zhou; Alexandra Vivas Duarte; Damien J Downes; Richard B Todd; Wendy Kloezen; Harm Post; Albert J R Heck; A F Maarten Altelaar; Ronald P de Vries
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Sequence- and Structure-Based Functional Annotation and Assessment of Metabolic Transporters in Aspergillus oryzae: A Representative Case Study.

Authors:  Nachon Raethong; Jirasak Wong-Ekkabut; Kobkul Laoteng; Wanwipa Vongsangnak
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Estimating the success of enzyme bioprospecting through metagenomics: current status and future trends.

Authors:  Manuel Ferrer; Mónica Martínez-Martínez; Rafael Bargiela; Wolfgang R Streit; Olga V Golyshina; Peter N Golyshin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  Expression of naturally ionic liquid-tolerant thermophilic cellulases in Aspergillus niger.

Authors:  Saori Amaike Campen; Jed Lynn; Stephanie J Sibert; Sneha Srikrishnan; Pallavi Phatale; Taya Feldman; Joel M Guenther; Jennifer Hiras; Yvette Thuy An Tran; Steven W Singer; Paul D Adams; Kenneth L Sale; Blake A Simmons; Scott E Baker; Jon K Magnuson; John M Gladden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Innate function of house dust mite allergens: robust enzymatic degradation of extracellular matrix at elevated pH.

Authors:  Kumiko Oida; Lukas Einhorn; Ina Herrmann; Lucia Panakova; Yvonne Resch; Susanne Vrtala; Gerlinde Hofstetter; Akane Tanaka; Hiroshi Matsuda; Erika Jensen-Jarolim
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.084

7.  Genome mining for peptidases in heat-tolerant and mesophilic fungi and putative adaptations for thermostability.

Authors:  Tássio Brito de Oliveira; Cene Gostinčar; Nina Gunde-Cimerman; Andre Rodrigues
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Closely related fungi employ diverse enzymatic strategies to degrade plant biomass.

Authors:  Isabelle Benoit; Helena Culleton; Miaomiao Zhou; Marcos DiFalco; Guillermo Aguilar-Osorio; Evy Battaglia; Ourdia Bouzid; Carlo P J M Brouwer; Hala B O El-Bushari; Pedro M Coutinho; Birgit S Gruben; Kristiina S Hildén; Jos Houbraken; Luis Alexis Jiménez Barboza; Anthony Levasseur; Eline Majoor; Miia R Mäkelä; Hari-Mander Narang; Blanca Trejo-Aguilar; Joost van den Brink; Patricia A vanKuyk; Ad Wiebenga; Vincent McKie; Barry McCleary; Adrian Tsang; Bernard Henrissat; Ronald P de Vries
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Enabling Low Cost Biopharmaceuticals: A Systematic Approach to Delete Proteases from a Well-Known Protein Production Host Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  Christopher P Landowski; Anne Huuskonen; Ramon Wahl; Ann Westerholm-Parvinen; Anne Kanerva; Anna-Liisa Hänninen; Noora Salovuori; Merja Penttilä; Jari Natunen; Christian Ostermeier; Bernhard Helk; Juhani Saarinen; Markku Saloheimo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Saccharification of Lignocelluloses by Carbohydrate Active Enzymes of the White Rot Fungus Dichomitus squalens.

Authors:  Johanna Rytioja; Kristiina Hildén; Susanna Mäkinen; Jari Vehmaanperä; Annele Hatakka; Miia R Mäkelä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.