Literature DB >> 24965188

Cardiac troponin changes to distinguish type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction and 180-day mortality risk.

Yader Sandoval1, Sarah E Thordsen1, Stephen W Smith2, Karen M Schulz3, MaryAnn M Murakami3, Lesly A Pearce4, Fred S Apple5.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the ability of serial cardiac troponin (cTnI) changes (delta) to distinguish type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) (excluding all ST-segment elevation MIs (STEMIs)) and describe the diagnostic accuracy and 180-day mortality in MI versus no-MI patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Serial cTnIs were measured in 1112 consecutive patients without STEMI and within 6h of presentation to a United States emergency department: 856 (77%) with no MI, 66 (6%) type 1 MI, and 190 (17%) type 2 MI. Of the 0 to 3h and 0 to 6h absolute and relative cTnI changes, only the distribution of absolute change from 0 to 6h was significantly different between type 1 and type 2 MI: median (interquartile range) 311 (1430) ng/l vs. 80 (330) ng/l, p=0.03. Neither the absolute concentration change nor the absolute percent change from either 0 h to 3h (areas under the curves (AUCs) 0.57 and 0.54 respectively) or 0 h to 6h (AUCs 0.60 and 0.51) improved on the performance of the individual cTnI results at 3h (AUC 0.60) or 6h (AUC 0.62), respectively. After adjusting for age, and histories of heart failure and renal insufficiency, those with type 2 MI (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.9, p=0.004) and those with no index MI and cTnI(max0-6h) > 34 ng/l (2.5, CI 1.1-6.0, p=0.04) had increased risk of death within 180 days compared with those with no MI and cTnI(max 0-6h) ≤ 34 ng/l.
CONCLUSION: Delta cTnI did not aid in distinguishing type 1 MI from the more common type 2 MI. Patients diagnosed with type 2 MIs, which represented more than half of all index MIs, had increased risk of death after discharge. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction; cardiac troponin; delta troponin; risk outcomes; type 2 MI; universal definition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24965188     DOI: 10.1177/2048872614538411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care        ISSN: 2048-8726


  21 in total

1.  Microvascular spasm in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without culprit lesion (MINOCA).

Authors:  Giancarlo Pirozzolo; Andreas Seitz; Anastasios Athanasiadis; Raffi Bekeredjian; Udo Sechtem; Peter Ong
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kris G Vargas; Paul M Haller; Bernhard Jäger; Maximilian Tscharre; Ronald K Binder; Christian Mueller; Bertil Lindahl; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  High-sensitivity assays for troponin in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Yader Sandoval
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Influence of Age on the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Matthew T H Lowry; Dimitrios Doudesis; Ryan Wereski; Dorien M Kimenai; Christopher Tuck; Amy V Ferry; Anda Bularga; Caelan Taggart; Kuan K Lee; Andrew R Chapman; Anoop S V Shah; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills; Atul Anand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 39.918

6.  Demand Ischemia as a Predictor of Mortality in Older Patients With Delirium.

Authors:  Manish Kumar; Shivaraj Patil; Lucas Da Cunha Godoy; Chia-Ling Kuo; Helen Swede; George A Kuchel; Kai Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-06

7.  Clinical variables for predicting type-1 and type-2 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in those presenting with ischemic symptoms.

Authors:  Edward T Ha; Brandon Ng; Abeer Afshaq; Eitan Fleischman; Batool Hosain; Roohi Sharma; Theodore J Gaeta; Manish Parikh; Stephen J Peterson; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Distribution of contemporary sensitivity troponin in the emergency department and relationship to 30-day mortality: The CHARIOT-ED substudy.

Authors:  Jonathan Hinton; Mark Mariathas; Lavinia Gabara; Zoe Nicholas; Rick Allan; Sanjay Ramamoorthy; Mamas A Mamas; Michael Mahmoudi; Paul Cook; Nick Curzen
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 9.  Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Kuan Ken Lee; David A McAllister; Louise Cullen; Jaimi H Greenslade; William Parsonage; Andrew Worster; Peter A Kavsak; Stefan Blankenberg; Johannes Neumann; Nils A Sörensen; Dirk Westermann; Madelon M Buijs; Gerard J E Verdel; John W Pickering; Martin P Than; Raphael Twerenbold; Patrick Badertscher; Zaid Sabti; Christian Mueller; Atul Anand; Philip Adamson; Fiona E Strachan; Amy Ferry; Dennis Sandeman; Alasdair Gray; Richard Body; Brian Keevil; Edward Carlton; Kim Greaves; Frederick K Korley; Thomas S Metkus; Yader Sandoval; Fred S Apple; David E Newby; Anoop S V Shah; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cardiac biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome: from history to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Paul Morris; Asma Lina Fazlanie; Sethumadhavan Vijayan; Balazs Dancso; Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar; Sven Plein; Christian Mueller; Philip Haaf
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.