Bin Zhang1, Francesco Nardi2, Helen Hull-Sanders3, Xuanwu Wan4, Yinghong Liu5. 1. Key Lab of Integrated Pest Management of Shandong Province, College of Agronomy and Plant Protection, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China. 2. Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. 3. Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America. 4. Sichuan Plant Protection Station, Chengdu, China. 5. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
The complete 16,043 bp mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae) has been sequenced. The genome encodes 37 genes usually found in insect mitogenomes. The mitogenome information for B. minax was compared to the homologous sequences of Bactrocera oleae, Bactrocera tryoni, Bactrocera philippinensis, Bactrocera carambolae, Bactrocera papayae, Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera correcta, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Ceratitis capitata. The analysis indicated the structure and organization are typical of, and similar to, the nine closely related species mentioned above, although it contains the lowest genome-wide A+T content (67.3%). Four short intergenic spacers with a high degree of conservation among the nine tephritid species mentioned above and B. minax were observed, which also have clear counterparts in the control regions (CRs). Correlation analysis among these ten tephritid species revealed close positive correlation between the A+T content of zero-fold degenerate sites (P0FD), the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P0FD sites to all degenerate sites (zero-fold degenerate sites, two-fold degenerate sites and four-fold degenerate sites) and amino acid sequence distance (ASD) were found. Further, significant positive correlation was observed between the A+T content of four-fold degenerate sites (P4FD) and the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P4FD sites to all degenerate sites; however, we found significant negative correlation between ASD and the A+T content of P4FD, and the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P4FD sites to all degenerate sites. A higher nucleotide substitution frequency at non-synonymous sites compared to synonymous sites was observed in nad4, the first time that has been observed in an insect mitogenome. A poly(T) stretch at the 5' end of the CR followed by a [TA(A)]n-like stretch was also found. In addition, a highly conserved G+A-rich sequence block was observed in front of the poly(T) stretch among the ten tephritid species and two tandem repeats were present in the CR.
The complete 16,043 bp mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae) has been sequenced. The genome encodes 37 genes usually found in insect mitogenomes. The mitogenome information for B. minax was compared to the homologous sequences of Bactrocera oleae, Bactrocera tryoni, Bactrocera philippinensis, Bactrocera carambolae, Bactrocera papayae, Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera correcta, Bactrocera cucurbitae and Ceratitis capitata. The analysis indicated the structure and organization are typical of, and similar to, the nine closely related species mentioned above, although it contains the lowest genome-wide A+T content (67.3%). Four short intergenic spacers with a high degree of conservation among the nine tephritid species mentioned above and B. minax were observed, which also have clear counterparts in the control regions (CRs). Correlation analysis among these ten tephritid species revealed close positive correlation between the A+T content of zero-fold degenerate sites (P0FD), the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P0FD sites to all degenerate sites (zero-fold degenerate sites, two-fold degenerate sites and four-fold degenerate sites) and amino acid sequence distance (ASD) were found. Further, significant positive correlation was observed between the A+T content of four-fold degenerate sites (P4FD) and the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P4FD sites to all degenerate sites; however, we found significant negative correlation between ASD and the A+T content of P4FD, and the ratio of nucleotide substitution frequency at P4FD sites to all degenerate sites. A higher nucleotide substitution frequency at non-synonymous sites compared to synonymous sites was observed in nad4, the first time that has been observed in an insect mitogenome. A poly(T) stretch at the 5' end of the CR followed by a [TA(A)]n-like stretch was also found. In addition, a highly conserved G+A-rich sequence block was observed in front of the poly(T) stretch among the ten tephritid species and two tandem repeats were present in the CR.
The family Tephritidae, generally known as “true” fruit flies, includes 471 genera and 4257 species distributed throughout the temperate and tropical areas of the world. Many species are of critical importance to man either as pests of fruit and vegetable crops or as beneficial species for the control of weeds [1]. The fruit flyBactrocera minax Enderlein (Diptera: Tephritidae), generally known as the Chinese citrus fruit fly, has been a serious pest of commercial citrus crops in China for more than half a century [2]. This species has been recorded in southern China, India (West Bengal and Sikkim) and Bhutan [2], [3] wild and cultivated citrus species [4]. Some hosts are endemic to southern China and the eastern Himalayan region [5] but B. minax has been reported on the kumquat Fortunella crassifolia
[6] and the boxthorn Lycium chinense
[2].B. minax was first collected from India and Sikkim and designated B. minax Enderlein [1]. Drew [3] provided a detailed description and illustration of the B. minax type specimens collected in 1920 and assigned the species to the genus Bactrocera (Polistomimetes). White and Wang [7] designated a lectotype of B. minax and assigned the species to the Bactrocera (Tetradacus); in addition, they indicated that Bactrocera citri Chen, collected from China in 1940, should be placed in synonymy with B. minax.A wide variety of questions about the biology and phylogeny of B. minax have been addressed with the aid of molecular tools. These studies could have used two main sources of genetic data; namely, nuclear sequence data and, most frequently, mitochondrial sequence data. Insect mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) usually occurs as a double-stranded closed circular molecule, ranging in size from 14–20 kb and generally encoding 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and 22 transfer RNA (tRNAs), which is conserved across bilaterian metazoans with only a few exceptions (e.g. loss of a small number of genes in some derived groups) [8]. The molecule contains at least one sequence of variable length known as the A+T-rich region or control region (CR), which contains initiation sites for transcription and replication [9] and ranges in size from tens to several thousands of base pairs [10]–[13]. As the results of highly conservative gene structures among phyla, maternal inheritance, high copy number and relatively fast evolution rates compared to nuclear DNA [14], mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) sequences have been regarded as useful molecular markers in studies focusing on comparative and evolutionary genomics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, phylogeography and population genetics [15].Many complete or nearly complete mitogenomes have been sequenced and comparative analyses at the genus or species level have used multiple complete mitochondrial genes instead of one or partial genes, including molecular systematics [16]–[20], population genetics/phylogeography [16], diagnostics [21], molecular evolutionary studies [13], [22], [23], the frequency and type of gene rearrangements [24], [25] and the evolution of genome size [26]. To date, more than 500 insect mitogenomes have been sequenced from all orders, including 77 dipterans in 24 families, and are available in Genbank. In this study, we sequenced the complete sequence of the mitogenome of B. minax (Diptera: Tephritidae).Genbank contains information for only ten Tephritidae species; Bactrocera oleae, Bactrocera tryoni, Bactrocera philippinensis, Bactrocera carambolae, Bactrocera papayae, Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera correcta, Bactrocera cucurbitae, Ceratitis capitata and B. minax. Nine of these species belong to the genus Bactrocera, including four species of the B. dorsalis species complex; the other species belongs to the genus Ceratitis. Within the nine Bactrocera species, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae and B. dorsalis belong to the B. dorsalis species complex, B. correcta, B. cucurbitae and B. tryoni belong to other species-groups within the subgenus Bactrocera, and B. oleae and B. minax belong to the subgenus Daculus and Tetradacus, respectively. Although recent molecular evidence suggests B. papaya, B. philippinensis and B. dorsalis likely represent one species [27]–[30], with anticipation of the analysis of the B. minax mitogenome, we compare the sequence and mitogenome origins to the tephritid species B. oleae, B. dorsalis, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae, B. correcta, B. cucurbitaeB. tryoni and C. capitata.
Materials and Methods
1. Insect and mtDNA extraction, protein-coding genes and sequencing
We collected B. minax adults from a citrus garden on private land at Xianli Zeng covering an area of 20 hectares in Wulong (Chongqing Province, China). We confirm that Mr Zeng, the owner of this land, allowed us to conduct the study on this site. No specific permission was required for this location and our activity. We confirm the field studies did not involve endangered or protected species. B. minax adults were stored at 25°C in 99% (v/v) ethanol. Morphological identification was done according to White and Wang [7]. Total DNA was isolated from three adult specimens using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The whole B. minax mitogenome sequence was assembled from a single individual (three repeats). Purified total DNA was used as a template for amplification of the entire B. minax mitogenome in 21 overlapping pieces, ranging in size from 388 bp to 1762 bp. PCR primers were designed as described [31] and by comparison to the available sequences of B. oleae, B. dorsalis, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae, B. correcta, B. cucurbitaeB. tryoni and C. capitata (Table 1). Amplification was done in a thermocycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler 5333) in 50 µl reactions containing 5 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 5 µl of 10×PCR Buffer (Mg2+ free), 8 µl of a dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 3 µl of 10 µM each primer, 0.5 µl of 5 U/µl Taq polymerase (Takara Biomedical, Japan) and 2 µl of a 1/10 dilution of the DNA extract. Amplification conditions were: 5′ of pre-PCR denaturation at 94°C followed by 34 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min at 40–58°C (depending on the primer pair) and 2 min at 72°C. The F21 fragment (Fig. 1) was amplified using LA Taq (Takara Biomedical, Japan) and a cycle consisting of a pre-PCR denaturation at 96°C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of 10 s at 98°C and 2 min at 58°C with a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis and purified using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN). PCR products were sequenced directly on both strands using amplification and additional ad hoc primers as needed. Individual sequences were combined in a consensus contig using DNAStar package software (DNAStar Inc.).
Table 1
Summary of primers used for complete mtgenome of B. minax amplification.
Fragment
Upper primer
Sequence
Location
Down primer
Sequence
Location
Fragment Length
F1
F1-Ur
GCTAATTAAGCTACTGGGTTCAT
155–177
F1-Dr
TGTTCCTACTATTCCGGCTCA
1539–1560
1406
F2
F2-Ur
TACAATCTATCGCCTAAACTTCAGCC
1442–1468
F2-Ds
TAGGCACGAGTATCTACATCTAT
2357–2379
938
F3
F3-Us
GATTCTTTGGACACCCAGAA
2175–2194
F3-Ds
ATTCATAACTTCAATATCATTG
3383–3406
1232
F4
F4-Ur
ATGGCAGATTAGTGCAATGG
3016–3035
F4-Dr
GTTTAAGAGACCAGTACTTG
3789–3810
795
F5
F5-Ur
GAAATTTGCGGGGCTAATCATAG
3670–3692
F5-Dr
GAGGTCATATAGCTCCCAGTTCAAT
5072–5096
1427
F6
F6-Ur
ATCAGCTGTTGCTATTATTCA
4670–4690
F6-Dr
ACTGTAAAAAATAACCCTTGTG
5223–5245
576
F7
F7-Ur
GTAACATTAGGATAACGGTGAGGAA
4967–5991
F7-Ds
TGCAATAAATCGCTTCATATTCT
6027–6049
1083
F8
F8-Us
TATCGGCCTATACCAGGAAGGA
5908–5929
F8-Dr
GATCAAGGTTGGTCAGAA
6543–6560
653
F9
F9-Ur
AATTACCCTAACATCTTCAGTG
6355–6376
F9-Ds
TATCTAATCGGATTGGAGATGT
7684–7705
1351
F10
F10-Ur
GCTCTCTTAGTTATAGCTGC
7546–7565
F10-Ds
GGTAAGCATTAGTCTGGTT
8783–8801
1256
F11
F11-Us
ACAAAACAAACCTGACGAAC
8600–8619
F11-Ds
TAGTAGAATGAATCTTTTTATA
9215–9236
637
F12
F12-Us
GGGGCCTCAACATGAGCCCT
8913–8932
F12-Ds
TTTACAACTGCGATTAGGGT
10422–10441
1529
F13
F13-Us
AGGAGGTATATTAGTTCTATTCA
10139–10161
F13-Ds
GCAAATAGGAAGTATCATTC
11297–11314
1176
F14
F14-Us
AGCAACAGCATTCATAGGATA
10858–10878
F14-Ds
CTTTACCTCGTTTTCGTTATGAT
11802–11824
967
F15
F15-Ur
ACATGAATTGGAGCACGACCAGT
11492–11511
F15-Dr
GTGGCTTTTTTAACTCTTTTGGAACG
12556–12579
1088
F16
F16-Ur
TAGAATTAGAAGATCAGCCAGC
12254–12275
F16-Ds
ACTTTAGGGATAACAGCGTA
12960–12979
726
F17
F17-Us
TTCTAATACCTGGTCCTTTC
12757–12776
F17-Ds
CGTTTATTAGGGTATCTGGTTT
13713–13736
980
F18
F18-Ur
ATGTTTTTGTTAAACAGGCG
13360–13379
F18-Dr
AGACTAGGATTAGATACCCTATTAT
14555–14574
1215
F19
F19-Us
TACAGGACAGGTTCCTCTG
14458–14476
F19-Ds
GCGTGTATTTTTGCTTATTTA
14826–14845
388
F20
F20-Ur
AGGGTATCTAATCCTAGTTT
14557–14576
F20-Dr
AGTGATTAGGGTTCCTGTTATTA
254–275
1762
F21
F21-Us
ACTCCTACTACTTTAGCGTT
14618–14637
F1-Dr
TGTTCCTACTATTCCGGCTCA
1539–1560
2986
Note: Lowercase “r” behind some primer names represents these primers were designed on basis of Simon et al. (1994); Lowercase “r” behind some primer names represents these primers were designed by us.
Figure 1
Circular map of the mitogenome of B. minax.
The genes located outside adjoined the bold line circle (J-strand) indicated that the direction of transcription is opposite to the genes located inside adjoined the bold line circle (N-strand). B. minax complete mitogenome was jointed using 21 (F1–F21) fragments shown as single lines within the bold line circle.
Circular map of the mitogenome of B. minax.
The genes located outside adjoined the bold line circle (J-strand) indicated that the direction of transcription is opposite to the genes located inside adjoined the bold line circle (N-strand). B. minax complete mitogenome was jointed using 21 (F1–F21) fragments shown as single lines within the bold line circle.Note: Lowercase “r” behind some primer names represents these primers were designed on basis of Simon et al. (1994); Lowercase “r” behind some primer names represents these primers were designed by us.
2. Sequence analysis and gene annotation
Genes encoded on the B. minax mitogenome were located initially by comparison to homologous full-length insect mitochondrial sequences using DNAStar. Nucleotide sequences of PCGs were translated using the invertebrate mtDNA genetic code. tRNA genes were identified initially using tRNAscan-SE Search Server version 1.21 (available online at http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/) [32] and refined using tRNAscan-SE and RNAshapes [33]. The presence and secondary structures of tRNA genes that could not be located by tRNAscan-SE owing to variant morphology were annotated manually by comparison to the sequences of other insect tRNAs [34]–[37]. Codon usage analysis and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in PCGs were calculated using CodonW version 1.4.2 (John Peden, available at http://codonw.sourceforge.net/index.html) [38]. Potential secondary structure folds of non-coding sequences and sequences in the CR were calculated with the DNA mfold web server using default settings (http://mfold.bioinfo.rpi.edu/cgi-bin/dna-form1.cgi) [39]. The presence of tandem repeats in the CR was investigated using the Tandem Repeats Finder available online (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) [40]. The A+T content and nucleotide substitution frequency at synonymous sites and non-synonymous sites (the number of synonymous substitutions per site and the number of non-synonymous substitutions per site) were calculated on the basis of the data using MEGA 4.0 [41]. The correlation analysis was done by the bivariate method using SPSS version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The overall average amino acid distance among each of the PCGs from ten tephritid species (B. minax, B. oleae, B. tryoniB. dorsalisB. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae, B. correcta, B. cucurbitae and C. capitata) were calculated by the method of Poisson distances by MEGA 4.0 [41]. The complete B. minax mtDNA sequence was deposited in Genbank under accession no. HM776033.
Results and Discussion
1. Genome organization
The mitochondrial genome of B. minax is a closed circular molecule of 16043 bp; hence, it is longer than the other nine tephritid mitogenomes available (range 15,815 bp in B. oleae to 15,980 bp in C. capitata) but is still well within the range of other insect mitogenomes (14,503 bp in Rhopalomyia pomum
[42] to 19517 bp in Drosophila melanogaster
[11]). The gene content is typical of metazoan mitogenomes, with 13 PCGs (cox1-3, cob, nad1-6, nad4l, atp6 and atp8), 22 tRNAs and two genes for ribosomal RNA subunits (rrnS and rrnL). A long uninterrupted non-coding region of 1141 bp, likely homologous to the insect A+T-rich region, is present between rrnS and trnI, corresponding to position 14,903 to 16,043 in the annotated sequence. The gene order in the B. minax mitogenome corresponds to the typical and plesiomorphic state hypothesized for the Pancrustacea, and is shared with all tephritids analyzed to date (Fig. 1).Genes in the B. minax mitogenome overlap by a total of 43 bp, distributed in 12 segments from 1 to 17 bp long and are separated by a total of 178 bp dispersed in 16 intergenic spacers from 2 to 42 bp (without taking the tRNA-like sequence into account; Table 2). Despite its relatively large size, the B. minax mitogenome has more overlapping sequences between genes compared to those of other tephritids; genes overlap by a total of 35 bp at 11 boundaries in B. oleae, 29 bp in seven locations in B. tryoni, 27 bp in five locations in B. dorsalis, 34 bp in ten locations in B. philippinensis, 32 bp in nine locations in B. carambolae, 34 bp in ten locations in B. papayae, 35 bp in 11 locations in B. correcta, 32 bp in nine locations in B. cucurbitae and only 3 bp at three boundaries in C. capitata.
Table 2
Summary of B. minax mitogenome.
Gene
Direction
Location
Size
IGS
Anticodon
Start code
Stop code
trnI
F
1–65
65
0
GAT
trnQ
R
66–134
69
10
TTG
trnM
F
145–213
69
−1
CAT
nad2
F
213–1235
1023
8
ATT
TAG
trnW
F
1244–1311
68
−8
TCA
trnC
R
1304–1365
62
42
GCA
trnY
R
1408–1475
68
−2
GTA
cox1
F
1474–3009
1536
−1
TCG
TAT
trnL(UUR)
F
3009–3072
65
5
TAA
cox2
F
3078–3764
687
6
ATG
TAA
trnK
F
3771–3841
71
−1
CTT
trnD
F
3841–3908
68
0
GTC
atp8
F
3909–4070
162
−7
ATT
TAA
atp6
F
4064–4741
678
−1
ATG
TAG
cox3
F
4741–5532
792
6
ATG
TAA
trnG
F
5539–5604
66
0
TCC
nad3
F
5605–5956
352
0
GTC
T
trnA
F
5957–6021
65
5
TGC
trnR
F
6027–6090
64
28
TCG
trnN
F
6119–6183
65
0
GTT
trnS(AGN)
F
6184–6251
68
2
GCT
trnE
F
6254–6319
66
18
TTC
trnF
R
6338–6403
66
−1
GAA
nad5
R
6403–8122
1720
14
ATT
T
trnH
R
8137–8201
65
4
GTG
nad4
R
8206–9546
1341
−17
ATG
TAA
nad4l
R
9530–9826
297
2
ATG
TAA
trnT
F
9829–9893
65
0
TGT
trnP
R
9894–9959
66
2
TGG
nad6
F
9962–10483
522
−1
ATG
TAA
cob
F
10483–11619
1137
−2
ATG
TAG
trnS(UCN)
F
11618–11684
67
16
TGA
nad1
R
11701–12640
940
10
ATA
T
trnL(CUN)
R
12651–12716
66
0
TAG
rrnL
R
12717–14049
1333
−1
trnV
R
14049–14120
72
0
TAC
rrnS
R
14121–14902
782
0
CR
14903–16043
1141
0
2. Nucleotide composition
The overall base composition of B. minax is 38.0% A, 11.2% G, 29.3% T and 21.5% C. Similar to other insect sequences, the B. minax mitogenome nucleotide composition is biased toward adenine and thymine (67.3% A+T), which is the lowest value among the tephritid mitogenomes available. Analyzed separately, all PCGs (64.3%), tRNAs (72.2%), sRNAs (73.7%) and CR (77.6%) have the lowest A+T content compared to the other known tephritid mitogenomes (Table 3).
Table 3
Length and base composition of different genomic regions in 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
Accession No. and speices
Whole mtDNA
PCGs
tRNAs
rRNAs
CR
Size
(A+T)%
Size
(A+T)%
Size
(A+T)%
Size
(A+T)%
Size
(A+T)%
AY210702 B. oleae
15815
72.6
11188
70.1
1484
75.1
2116
77.1
949
86.9
HQ130030 B. tryoni
15925
72.5
11186
69.6
1467
75.0
2115
77.7
951
87.0
DQ995281 B. philippinensis
15915
73.6
11192
71.1
1466
75.3
2114
77.7
949
88.2
EF014414 B. carambolae
15915
73.6
11190
71.2
1466
75.1
2113
77.6
950
87.9
DQ917578 B. papayae
15915
73.5
11190
71.0
1465
75.1
2114
77.7
950
88.2
DQ 845759 B. dorsalis
15915
73.6
11185
71.2
1467
75.2
2123
77.8
949
88.1
AJ242872 C. capitata
15980
77.5
11272
75.5
1472
76.8
2123
80.2
1004
91.1
HM776033 B. minax
16043
67.3
11187
64.3
1466
72.2
2115
73.7
1141
77.6
JX456552 B. correcta
15936
73.2
11192
71.2
1470
75.3
2117
77.9
949
78.6
JN635562 B. curcubitae
15825
72.8
11190
70.7
1467
75.1
2110
77.8
946
82.3
Considering the two strands separately, the PCGs on the Majority strand (J-strand, nine PCGs are located on this strand) (61.5%) have a lower A+T content compared to the Minority strand (N-strand, the other four PCGs are located on this strand) (68.9%). Furthermore, PCGs encoded on the J-strand have a comparable content of A (31.0%) and T (30.5%), whereas PCGs on the N-strand show a strong bias for T content (46.3%) compared to A content (22.6% A). The above situation has been observed in the other tephritid mitogenomes available (data not shown) and in other insects [34]–[37], [43]–[50]. However, tRNAs on the two opposite strands have nearly equal A+T contents, which has been found in the other nine tephritid species. For three PCG codon positions, the third codon positions have significantly higher A+T content than the first and second codon positions owing to genetic code degeneracies. In particular, T in each codon position of PCGs on the N-strand is over-represented. With exception of the second codon position over-representing T, however, the first and third codon positions of PCGs show a preponderance of A on the J-strand and T on the N-strand, which is similar to many insect mitogenomes [34]–[37], [43]–[50] (Table 3).The base compositional bias for A+T in PCGs is reflected in the relative synonymous codon usage statistics of the B. minax mitogenome (Table 4). With the exception of amino acid His, codons with A or T in the third codon position are generally strongly over-represented compared to codons terminating with either G or C. The ratio of G+C-rich (Pro, Ala, Arg and Gly) codons to A+T-rich codons (Phe, Ile, Met, Tyr, Asn and Lys) in B. minaxPCGs was 0.44, which is higher compared to the other nine tephritids B. dorsalis (0.29), B. philippinensis (0.29), B. carambolae (0.30), B. papayae (0.29), B. correcta (0.30), B. cucurbitae (0.32), B. oleae (0.31), B. tryoni (0.32) and C. capitata (0.23). This demonstrates the amino acid composition is affected by the lower A+T mutational bias in B. minax (67.3%) and the stronger A+T mutational bias in B. dorsalis (73.6%), B. philippinensis (73.6%), B. carambolae (73.6%), B. papayae (73.5%), B. correcta (73.2%), B. cucurbitae (72.8%), B. oleae (72.6%), B. tryoni (72.4%) and C. capitata (77.5%).
Table 4
Relative synonymous codon usage of 10 tephritid species, 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
Amino acid
Codon
B. minax
B. dorsalis
B. oleae
B. tryoni
C. capitata
B. philippinensis
B. carambolae
B. papaya
B. correcta
B. curcubitae
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
All
J
N
Phe
UUU
1.37
1.06
1.69
1.52
1.37
1.73
1.48
1.25
1.77
1.44
1.31
1.72
1.68
1.67
1.79
1.51
1.36
1.73
1.50
1.35
1.72
1.51
1.36
1.73
1.48
1.39
1.81
1.46
1.34
1.69
UUC
0.63
0.94
0.31
0.48
0.63
0.27
0.52
0.75
0.23
0.56
0.69
0.28
0.32
0.33
0.21
0.49
0.64
0.27
0.50
0.65
0.28
0.49
0.64
0.27
0.52
0.61
0.19
0.54
0.66
0.31
Leu
UUA
2.11
1.41
2.52
2.76
2.44
3.27
2.70
2.44
3.07
2.50
2.07
2.94
3.62
4.00
4.04
2.78
2.51
3.25
2.84
2.52
3.28
2.79
2.52
3.27
2.70
2.29
3.42
2.93
2.68
3.20
UUG
1.09
0.38
2.03
0.84
0.30
1.33
0.85
0.31
1.60
0.89
0.24
1.44
0.74
0.36
0.88
0.81
0.30
1.28
0.86
0.33
1.36
0.86
0.33
1.37
0.67
0.31
0.89
0.78
0.46
1.32
CUU
0.98
1.23
0.72
1.10
1.59
0.77
0.98
1.14
0.81
1.08
1.62
0.79
0.87
0.87
0.70
1.08
1.56
0.77
1.11
1.59
0.77
1.07
1.53
0.70
1.03
1.48
0.72
0.98
1.49
0.68
CUC
0.46
0.83
0.18
0.21
0.30
0.08
0.35
0.48
0.05
0.31
0.38
0.06
0.13
0.15
0.03
0.19
0.26
0.08
0.16
0.23
0.08
0.19
0.24
0.11
0.30
0.34
0.25
0.26
0.25
0.12
CUA
0.96
1.81
0.36
0.79
1.15
0.40
0.89
1.40
0.34
0.94
1.33
0.53
0.44
0.54
0.21
0.80
1.12
0.43
0.73
1.07
0.32
0.77
1.13
0.38
1.03
1.30
0.58
0.84
0.98
0.62
CUG
0.39
0.36
0.18
0.30
0.23
0.16
0.23
0.22
0.13
0.28
0.36
0.24
0.19
0.08
0.13
0.34
0.26
0.19
0.31
0.26
0.19
0.32
0.26
0.19
0.29
0.27
0.14
0.21
0.14
0.06
Ile
AUU
1.42
1.23
1.83
1.72
1.66
1.84
1.56
1.50
1.87
1.59
1.61
1.77
1.77
1.72
1.83
1.71
1.67
1.83
1.73
1.69
1.85
1.70
1.64
1.81
1.70
1.65
1.83
1.52
1.51
1.61
AUC
0.58
0.77
0.17
0.28
0.34
0.16
0.44
0.50
0.13
0.41
0.39
0.23
0.23
0.28
0.17
0.29
0.33
0.17
0.27
0.31
0.15
0.30
0.36
0.19
0.30
0.35
0.17
0.48
0.49
0.39
Met
AUA
1.33
1.45
1.20
1.37
1.46
1.42
1.41
1.46
1.37
1.43
1.43
1.51
1.53
1.44
1.69
1.38
1.47
1.45
1.40
1.44
1.46
1.38
1.45
1.41
1.49
1.43
1.52
1.48
1.40
1.56
AUG
0.67
0.55
0.80
0.63
0.54
0.58
0.59
0.54
0.63
0.57
0.57
0.49
0.47
0.56
0.31
0.62
0.53
0.55
0.60
0.56
0.54
0.62
0.55
0.59
0.51
0.57
0.48
0.52
0.60
0.44
Val
GUU
1.46
0.63
2.09
1.52
1.14
2.04
1.41
0.74
2.29
1.55
1.32
1.94
2.31
2.10
2.50
1.59
1.19
2.11
1.64
1.23
2.15
1.63
1.28
2.11
1.75
1.47
2.20
1.67
1.43
2.03
GUC
0.48
0.77
0.18
0.44
0.42
0.30
0.39
0.63
0.25
0.52
0.49
0.56
0.27
0.07
0.39
0.41
0.42
0.30
0.34
0.35
0.31
0.38
0.36
0.30
0.24
0.42
0.12
0.46
0.35
0.42
GUA
1.25
1.88
0.93
1.49
2.23
1.09
1.70
2.40
0.96
1.42
1.71
1.06
1.13
1.63
0.83
1.41
2.13
0.99
1.45
2.22
0.97
1.39
2.15
0.95
1.56
1.84
1.22
1.59
2.07
1.13
GUG
0.81
0.72
0.81
0.55
0.21
0.57
0.51
0.23
0.50
0.52
0.49
0.44
0.30
0.20
0.28
0.59
0.26
0.60
0.57
0.20
0.57
0.60
0.21
0.65
0.45
0.26
0.46
0.28
0.15
0.42
Ser
UCU
1.29
0.96
2.19
1.66
1.20
2.13
1.61
1.43
1.97
2.14
1.48
2.29
2.02
1.59
2.06
1.67
1.20
2.13
1.62
1.13
2.16
1.70
1.21
2.13
1.94
1.28
2.59
1.92
1.50
1.99
UCC
1.17
1.14
0.31
0.65
0.63
0.35
0.85
0.76
0.36
0.48
0.43
0.34
0.56
0.74
0.24
0.63
0.63
0.40
0.64
0.63
0.35
0.59
0.55
0.35
0.62
0.59
0.29
0.69
0.72
0.53
UCA
1.35
1.26
0.66
1.81
1.93
0.86
1.48
1.53
1.07
1.68
1.88
0.95
1.67
1.69
1.24
1.74
1.88
0.86
1.81
1.95
0.82
1.74
1.89
0.86
1.68
1.84
1.00
1.57
1.57
1.11
UCG
0.53
0.29
0.31
0.46
0.31
0.23
0.46
0.28
0.36
0.40
0.40
0.22
0.28
0.23
0.12
0.44
0.29
0.23
0.40
0.26
0.18
0.47
0.32
0.23
0.38
0.26
0.18
0.47
0.40
0.12
Pro
CCU
1.33
1.43
1.93
1.78
1.35
3.33
1.85
1.65
2.75
1.61
1.46
1.86
2.09
1.82
2.59
1.89
1.44
3.11
1.84
1.45
3.16
1.79
1.41
3.53
1.72
1.49
2.30
1.67
1.78
2.06
CCC
1.23
1.17
1.19
0.85
1.14
0.22
0.79
0.95
0.50
0.96
1.15
1.29
0.27
0.57
0.00
0.74
1.00
0.44
0.80
1.05
0.21
0.84
1.10
0.24
0.89
1.06
0.48
0.90
0.85
0.77
CCA
1.30
1.25
0.59
1.33
1.47
0.44
1.09
1.12
0.75
1.27
1.27
0.71
1.45
1.51
1.41
1.33
1.48
0.22
1.25
1.41
0.63
1.26
1.37
0.24
1.29
1.29
1.09
1.27
1.30
0.90
CCG
0.14
0.16
0.30
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.27
0.28
0.00
0.16
0.12
0.14
0.18
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.22
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.11
0.12
0.00
0.10
0.16
0.12
0.16
0.07
0.26
Thr
ACU
1.38
1.29
2.40
1.60
1.32
2.84
1.66
1.39
2.53
1.42
1.26
2.17
1.65
1.41
2.07
1.62
1.34
2.84
1.58
1.31
2.78
1.61
1.34
2.92
1.48
1.36
2.38
1.48
1.33
1.53
ACC
1.03
1.08
0.46
0.66
0.71
0.21
0.70
0.77
0.40
0.71
0.77
0.43
0.60
0.60
0.41
0.65
0.71
0.32
0.69
0.73
0.22
0.64
0.71
0.22
0.70
0.64
0.48
0.72
0.70
0.77
ACA
1.29
1.33
0.69
1.52
1.67
0.74
1.45
1.68
0.80
1.55
1.73
0.96
1.52
1.65
1.38
1.52
1.67
0.63
1.48
1.66
0.78
1.53
1.67
0.76
1.61
1.78
0.95
1.50
1.68
1.36
ACG
0.29
0.29
0.46
0.22
0.30
0.21
0.19
0.16
0.27
0.33
0.25
0.43
0.24
0.33
0.14
0.20
0.28
0.21
0.26
0.30
0.22
0.22
0.28
0.11
0.21
0.22
0.19
0.30
0.29
0.34
Ala
GCU
1.43
0.97
2.27
2.16
1.66
2.87
2.02
1.39
3.31
1.81
1.40
2.70
2.42
2.41
2.40
2.04
1.71
2.63
2.12
1.77
2.44
2.14
1.69
2.84
1.98
1.68
2.47
2.48
2.11
3.09
GCC
1.33
1.95
0.24
0.71
1.03
0.00
0.88
1.28
0.11
0.92
1.14
0.54
0.28
0.29
0.23
0.82
0.91
0.32
0.73
0.91
0.39
0.74
0.96
0.11
0.53
0.68
0.34
0.74
1.06
0.34
GCA
0.68
0.77
0.71
1.02
1.26
0.72
1.03
1.28
0.46
1.09
1.30
0.54
1.21
1.24
1.03
1.02
1.26
0.84
1.00
1.20
0.88
1.01
1.24
0.84
1.29
1.42
0.85
0.63
0.72
0.34
GCG
0.56
0.31
0.78
0.12
0.06
0.41
0.08
0.06
0.11
0.17
0.16
0.22
0.08
0.06
0.34
0.12
0.11
0.21
0.15
0.11
0.29
0.12
0.11
0.21
0.20
0.21
0.34
0.15
0.11
0.23
Tyr
UAU
1.31
1.13
1.76
1.58
1.40
1.81
1.44
1.25
1.83
1.46
1.39
1.70
1.58
1.46
1.82
1.53
1.36
1.73
1.56
1.38
1.77
1.56
1.38
1.76
1.51
1.33
1.75
1.40
1.35
1.75
UAC
0.69
0.87
0.24
0.42
0.60
0.19
0.56
0.75
0.17
0.54
0.61
0.30
0.42
0.54
0.18
0.47
0.64
0.27
0.44
0.62
0.23
0.44
0.62
0.24
0.49
0.67
0.25
0.60
0.65
0.25
Stop
UAA
1.11
1.45
1.07
1.17
1.76
0.94
1.19
1.73
1.07
1.28
1.69
1.33
1.36
1.76
1.09
1.17
1.75
0.98
1.18
1.76
0.98
1.18
1.75
1.00
1.21
1.81
1.57
1.27
1.71
1.36
UAG
0.89
0.55
0.93
0.83
0.24
1.06
0.81
0.27
0.93
0.72
0.31
0.67
0.64
0.24
0.91
0.83
0.25
1.02
0.82
0.24
1.02
0.82
0.25
1.00
0.79
0.19
0.43
0.73
0.29
0.64
His
CAU
1.04
1.02
1.78
1.27
1.22
1.88
1.46
1.37
2.00
1.23
1.18
1.30
1.57
1.55
1.87
1.33
1.30
1.88
1.29
1.22
1.87
1.30
1.22
1.88
1.22
1.13
1.57
1.45
1.18
1.64
CAC
0.96
0.98
0.22
0.73
0.78
0.13
0.54
0.63
0.00
0.78
0.82
0.70
0.42
0.45
0.13
0.67
0.70
0.13
0.71
0.78
0.13
0.70
0.78
0.13
0.78
0.87
0.43
0.55
0.82
0.36
Gln
CAA
1.33
1.79
1.33
1.19
1.74
1.33
1.38
1.82
1.47
1.35
1.73
1.49
1.45
1.83
1.68
1.28
1.80
1.38
1.25
1.80
1.38
1.25
1.80
1.38
1.40
1.75
1.48
1.39
1.80
1.65
CAG
0.67
0.21
0.67
0.81
0.26
0.67
0.62
0.18
0.53
0.65
0.27
0.51
0.55
0.17
0.32
0.72
0.20
0.63
0.75
0.20
0.63
0.75
0.20
0.63
0.60
0.25
0.52
0.61
0.20
0.35
Asn
AAU
1.22
1.14
1.74
1.44
1.36
1.68
1.45
1.33
1.75
1.42
1.36
1.55
1.66
1.57
1.80
1.46
1.40
1.63
1.46
1.39
1.68
1.42
1.37
1.63
1.41
1.39
1.43
1.39
1.36
1.59
AAC
0.78
0.86
0.26
0.56
0.64
0.32
0.55
0.67
0.25
0.58
0.64
0.45
0.34
0.43
0.20
0.54
0.60
0.38
0.54
0.61
0.32
0.58
0.63
0.38
0.59
0.61
0.57
0.61
0.64
0.41
Lys
AAA
1.30
1.57
0.78
1.26
1.52
0.97
1.37
1.65
0.97
1.45
1.56
1.52
1.46
1.65
1.42
1.26
1.51
0.97
1.25
1.51
1.06
1.26
1.51
1.00
1.46
1.45
1.23
1.47
1.53
1.35
AAG
0.70
0.43
1.22
0.74
0.48
1.03
0.63
0.35
1.03
0.55
0.44
0.48
0.54
0.35
0.58
0.74
0.49
1.03
0.75
0.49
0.94
0.74
0.49
1.00
0.54
0.55
0.77
0.53
0.47
0.65
Asp
GAU
1.26
0.94
1.42
1.44
1.29
1.70
1.54
1.40
1.79
1.42
0.94
1.75
1.63
1.41
2.00
1.47
1.29
1.78
1.41
1.35
1.64
1.41
1.29
1.64
1.46
1.38
1.39
1.46
1.25
1.59
GAC
0.74
1.06
0.58
0.56
0.71
0.30
0.46
0.60
0.21
0.58
1.06
0.25
0.37
0.59
0.00
0.53
0.71
0.22
0.59
0.65
0.36
0.59
0.71
0.36
0.54
0.63
0.61
0.54
0.75
0.41
Glu
GAA
1.22
2.00
1.00
1.43
2.00
1.62
1.38
2.00
1.28
1.37
1.85
1.38
1.34
1.93
1.56
1.39
2.00
1.48
1.44
2.00
1.62
1.44
2.00
1.60
1.56
2.00
1.76
1.29
2.00
1.19
GAG
0.78
0.00
1.00
0.57
0.00
0.38
0.62
0.00
0.72
0.63
0.15
0.62
0.66
0.07
0.44
0.61
0.00
0.52
0.56
0.00
0.38
0.56
0.00
0.40
0.44
0.00
0.24
0.71
0.00
0.81
Cys
UGU
1.47
1.00
1.46
1.47
1.14
1.55
1.60
1.03
1.77
1.40
1.10
1.61
1.50
1.12
1.73
1.48
1.20
1.56
1.47
1.18
1.54
1.44
1.14
1.50
1.48
1.14
1.74
1.52
1.03
1.76
UGC
0.53
1.00
0.54
0.53
0.86
0.45
0.40
0.97
0.23
0.60
0.90
0.39
0.50
0.88
0.27
0.52
0.80
0.44
0.53
0.82
0.46
0.56
0.86
0.50
0.52
0.86
0.26
0.48
0.97
0.24
Trp
UGA
1.25
1.49
1.00
1.47
1.47
1.42
1.47
1.57
1.23
1.44
1.46
1.35
1.63
1.53
1.41
1.47
1.48
1.43
1.48
1.53
1.33
1.53
1.53
1.43
1.61
1.50
1.64
1.66
1.46
1.42
UGG
0.75
0.51
1.00
0.53
0.53
0.58
0.53
0.43
0.77
0.56
0.54
0.65
0.37
0.47
0.59
0.53
0.52
0.57
0.52
0.47
0.67
0.47
0.47
0.57
0.39
0.50
0.36
0.34
0.54
0.58
Arg
CGU
1.33
0.84
1.71
0.82
0.60
1.87
1.00
0.60
1.56
0.85
0.78
0.80
1.25
1.20
1.67
0.68
0.42
1.43
0.62
0.49
1.33
0.74
0.50
1.75
0.98
0.72
1.47
1.19
0.98
1.20
CGC
0.56
0.90
0.19
0.36
0.80
0.00
0.17
0.68
0.00
0.31
0.52
1.07
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.39
0.95
0.00
0.44
0.98
0.22
0.37
0.90
0.00
0.27
0.72
0.21
0.37
0.73
0.20
CGA
1.39
1.61
0.95
2.09
1.90
1.07
2.00
1.87
1.11
2.00
1.74
1.07
2.13
1.87
2.00
2.15
1.89
1.14
2.13
1.76
1.33
2.14
1.90
1.00
1.87
1.85
1.26
1.70
1.55
2.00
CGG
0.72
0.65
1.14
0.73
0.70
1.07
0.83
0.85
1.33
0.85
0.96
1.07
0.63
0.67
0.33
0.78
0.74
1.43
0.80
0.78
1.11
0.74
0.70
1.25
0.89
0.72
1.05
0.74
0.73
0.60
Ser
AGU
1.15
1.17
1.78
1.15
1.25
1.55
1.07
1.17
1.31
0.92
1.08
1.17
1.07
1.10
1.35
1.19
1.28
1.61
1.17
1.29
1.52
1.17
1.29
1.55
1.10
1.30
1.53
1.04
1.20
1.46
AGC
0.70
1.11
0.46
0.65
0.91
0.52
0.78
1.15
0.48
0.84
1.08
0.84
0.72
0.95
0.65
0.66
0.92
0.46
0.68
0.92
0.58
0.68
0.95
0.52
0.78
0.97
0.53
0.63
0.95
0.35
AGA
0.94
0.99
1.27
1.01
0.81
1.55
1.00
0.74
1.91
0.92
0.73
1.57
1.00
0.72
1.65
1.04
0.84
1.50
1.00
0.82
1.52
1.02
0.82
1.55
0.88
0.72
1.41
1.04
0.80
1.93
AGG
0.86
1.08
1.02
0.61
0.96
0.81
0.76
0.94
0.54
0.63
0.93
0.62
0.70
0.97
0.71
0.63
0.97
0.81
0.68
1.00
0.88
0.64
0.97
0.81
0.64
1.05
0.47
0.63
0.87
0.53
Gly
GGU
0.89
0.40
1.42
1.06
1.00
1.39
1.06
0.83
1.28
0.93
0.98
1.13
1.26
0.74
1.73
1.18
1.01
1.48
1.14
0.97
1.41
1.14
1.01
1.35
1.10
0.92
1.33
1.53
1.51
1.68
GGC
0.43
0.53
0.41
0.11
0.15
0.27
0.37
0.54
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.24
0.20
0.32
0.18
0.08
0.15
0.22
0.11
0.15
0.27
0.11
0.15
0.27
0.18
0.05
0.27
0.18
0.24
0.23
GGA
1.07
1.89
0.49
1.93
2.35
1.44
1.47
2.00
0.99
1.51
2.05
0.84
2.01
2.79
1.13
1.95
2.43
1.37
1.96
2.46
1.41
1.92
2.38
1.41
2.16
2.67
1.53
1.53
1.84
1.22
GGG
1.61
1.19
1.68
0.90
0.50
0.91
1.10
0.63
1.53
1.34
0.73
1.79
0.53
0.16
0.96
0.79
0.41
0.93
0.79
0.41
0.92
0.84
0.46
0.97
0.56
0.36
0.87
0.76
0.42
0.87
Note: “All” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for all PCGs, “J” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for the PCGs on majority strand, “N” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for the PCGs on minority strand. The bold numbers represent the highest relative synonymous codon usage for each kind of amino acid.
Note: “All” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for all PCGs, “J” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for the PCGs on majority strand, “N” represents the relative synonymous codon usage for the PCGs on minority strand. The bold numbers represent the highest relative synonymous codon usage for each kind of amino acid.With the exception of first codon positions, G is under-represented compared to C in coding genes on the J-strand (PCGs, tRNAs, CR and intergenic nucleotides), while the G content is higher compared to C in coding genes on the N-strand (PCGs, tRNAs and rRNAs). This base compositional bias is in line with the general trend in the mitogenome toward a lower G content [51].Base compositional heterogeneity and among-site rate variation (ASRV) are known to affect phylogenetic inference, resulting in the identification of incorrect phylogenetic relationships [52]. The easiest solution is simply to avoid non-stationary genes [53] but most earlier studies used relatively intuitive mitogenome data partitioning schemes, including by gene type (PCG, rRNA and tRNA), by gene, by codon position, by codon and gene, or by the strand on which the coding gene is located [15]. Inevitably, different intuitive partitioning schemes can each result in strong conflicting topologies, especially at deeper phylogenetic levels [25], [54], [55]. Therefore, selection of stationary, reversible compositional homogeneous is vital for reliable phylogenetic inference [52], [56].Many earlier studies were focused on the A+T content of different genes or regions to investigate the base compositional heterogeneity and among-site rate variation ASRV [57]. For mitogenomes, composition bias of A+T content was verified in most earlier studies; e.g. A+T content was usually over-represented in non-coding regions [58] and the third codon position generally had stronger A+T composition bias compared to the other two codon positions [59] etc.. We asked how variability between PCGs is related to underlying A+T content and its distribution across synonymous and non-synonymous sites.In this study, the A+T content of zero-fold sites (P0FD), two-fold (P2FD) and four-fold degenerate sites (P4FD) was determined for each of the PCGs from ten tephritid species (B. minax, B. oleae, B. tryoniB. dorsalisB. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae, B. correcta, B. cucurbitae and C. capitata) (Fig. 2). Nucleotide substitution frequency was calculated in P0FD, P2FD and P4FD for each of the PCGs among five tephritid species (Fig. 3). After analyzing the correlation between A+T content and nucleotide substitution frequency for each of the PCGs, we found a significant positive correlation between A+T content percentage of zero-fold degenerate sites (AT0F) and nucleotide substitution frequency at P0FD (r = 0.735, P = 0.004) as well as between A+T content percentage of four-fold degenerate sites (AT4F) and nucleotide substitution frequency at P4FD (r = 0.864, P = 0.000) (Table 5). Correlation analysis indicated there is a significant positive correlation between AT0F and ASD (r = 0.752, P = 0.003), ASD and the nucleotide substitution number of zero-fold degenerate sites/the nucleotide substitution number of all degenerate sites (R0F/all) (r = 0.983, P = 0.000), AT0F and R0F/all (r = 0.760, P = 0.003) (Table 6). Interestingly, the significant positive correlation was observed between AT4F and the nucleotide substitution number of four-fold degenerate sites/the nucleotide substitution number of all degenerate sites (R4F/all) (r = 0.809, P = 0.001); however, there was significant negative correlation between AT4F and ASD (r = −0.828, P = 0.000), between R4F/all and ASD (r = −0.970, P = 0.000) (Table 6). On the basis of the above results, we can hypothesize divergence at the amino acid level of less well conserved PCGs is due to higher A+T at P0FD in those genes and/or lower A+T at P4FD. On the basis of this result, when we choose which PCGs are used to analyze phylogenic relationships for different evolutionary time scales, the A+T content of P0FD and/or P4FD of PCGs could be useful to judge the homogenesis of PCGs.
Figure 2
The AT content percentage of 0-fold degenerate sites, 2-fold degenerate sites and 4-fold degenerate sites in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
The black line with short line on the top of each bar represents the standard deviation value (SD).
Figure 3
The nucleotide substitution frequency at 0-fold degenerate sites, 2-fold degenerate sites and 4-fold degenerate sites in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
Table 5
A+T content percentage and nucleotide substitution frequency at 0-fold degenerate sites (P0FD), 2-fold degenerate sites (P2FD) and 4-fold degenerate sites (P4FD) (the number of substitutions per P0FD, P2FD and P4FD site)in each PCG of mtgenome of 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
Protein-coding genes
P0FD
P2FD
P4FD
A+T percentage (%)
nucleotide substitution frequency
A+T percentage (%)
nucleotide substitution frequency
A+T percentage (%)
nucleotide substitution frequency
nad2
70.96±1.41
0.198
74.61±8.66
0.811
74.33±10.99
1.689
cox1
56.53±0.21
0.025
73.31±8.55
0.743
84.93±7.82
1.409
cox2
59.71±0.74
0.074
76.92±7.67
0.624
82.47±8.64
1.306
atp8
68.92±0.81
0.235
81.54±8.66
0.577
83.33±11.86
1.400
atp6
68.76±2.92
0.459
63.36.±2.91
0.227
62.46±6.84
0.590
cox3
57.46±0.36
0.034
75.10±5.61
0.655
87.34±4.95
1.266
nad3
68.38±1.05
0.192
76.61±10.74
0.831
82.12±8.50
1.485
nad6
72.59±1.44
0.265
80.12±8.60
0.655
87.68±4.11
1.326
cob
61.62±0.42
0.057
68.66±9.26
0.741
81.14±6.72
1.417
nad1
65.54±0.53
0.094
88.33±2.51
0.381
73.72±1.09
1.090
nad4l
71.44±1.44
0.107
87.94±4.12
0.397
83.46±8.32
1.154
nad4
76.42±3.72
0.783
77.49±1.86
0.172
41.72±0.73
0.004
nad5
66.33±1.23
0.172
85.77±4.83
0.313
85.18±5.45
1.234
Correlation coefficient (r)
0.735
−0.217
0.864
Confidence probability (P)
0.004<0.01
0.477>0.05
0.000<0.01
Note: the correlation analysis used Pearson coefficient under two-tailed test of significance.
Table 6
The A+T content percentage of 0-fold degenerate sites (AT0F), the nucleotide substitution number of 0-fold degenerate sites/the nucleotide substitution number of all degenerate sites (R0F/all) and the mean genetic distance based on amino acid sequence (ASD) in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae, and the correlation coefficient between them (AT0F, R0F/all and ASD).
Protein-coding genes
AT0F
AT4F
R0F/all
R4F/all
ASD
AT0F & R0F/all
AT0F & ASD
R0F/all & ASD
AT4F & R4F/all
AT4F & ASD
R4F/all & ASD
nad2
70.96±1.41
74.33±10.99
0.290
0.362
0.117
r = 0.760, P = 0.003<0.01
r = 0.752, P = 0.003<0.01
r = 0.983, P = 0.000<0.01
r = 0.809, P = 0.001<0.01
r = −0.828, P = 0.000<0.01
r = −0.970, P = 0.000<0.01
cox1
56.53±0.21
84.93±7.82
0.046
0.606
0.014
cox2
59.71±0.74
82.47±8.64
0.148
0.514
0.036
atp8
68.92±0.81
83.33±11.86
0.400
0.350
0.164
atp6
68.76±2.92
62.46±6.84
0.780
0.141
0.280
cox3
57.46±0.36
87.34±4.95
0.068
0.552
0.014
nad3
68.38±1.05
82.12±8.50
0.300
0.350
0.105
nad6
72.59±1.44
87.68±4.11
0.417
0.297
0.168
cob
61.62±0.42
81.14±6.72
0.106
0.497
0.029
nad1
65.54±0.53
73.72±1.09
0.222
0.449
0.052
nad4l
71.44±1.44
83.46±8.32
0.244
0.385
0.053
nad4
76.42±3.72
41.72±0.73
0.936
0.004
0.382
nad5
66.33±1.23
85.18±5.45
0.357
0.431
0.083
Note: the correlation analysis used Pearson coefficient under two-tailed test of significance.
The A+T content percentage of 4-fold degenerate sites (AT4F), the nucleotide substitution number of 0-fold degenerate sites/the nucleotide substitution number of all degenerate sites (R4F/all) and the mean genetic distance based on amino acid sequence (ASD) in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species above, and the correlation coefficient between them (AT4F, R4F/all and ASD).
The AT content percentage of 0-fold degenerate sites, 2-fold degenerate sites and 4-fold degenerate sites in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
The black line with short line on the top of each bar represents the standard deviation value (SD).Note: the correlation analysis used Pearson coefficient under two-tailed test of significance.Note: the correlation analysis used Pearson coefficient under two-tailed test of significance.The A+T content percentage of 4-fold degenerate sites (AT4F), the nucleotide substitution number of 0-fold degenerate sites/the nucleotide substitution number of all degenerate sites (R4F/all) and the mean genetic distance based on amino acid sequence (ASD) in each protein-coding gene of mitochondrial genomes of 10 tephritid species above, and the correlation coefficient between them (AT4F, R4F/all and ASD).Nucleotide substitution is considered to be a reflection of evolution at the molecular level. Many earlier studies indicated the substitution was directional bias across different genes in the mitogenome [15]. Some researchers have proposed variation of A+T% among taxa is associated with directional mutation pressure and has a phylogenetic component [57], [60], [61]. In this study, with the exception of nad4, all PCGs had significantly lower variation of A+T content among the ten tephritid species at P0FD compared to both P2FD and P4FD sites. We observed that, with the exception of nad4, P0FD sites had lower nucleotide substitution frequency compared to both P2FD and P4FD sites (Fig. 3). The P0FD of nad4 had a higher nucleotide substitution frequency (0.783) compared to both P2FD (0.172) and P4FD (0.004), and the R0F/all was 0.936. As a result of functional constraints, the number of nucleotide substitution per non-synonymous site is usually lower than that per synonymous site [62]. In this study, a higher nucleotide substitution frequency at P0FD of nad4 indicates the non-synonymous nucleotide substitution frequency was higher compared to the synonymous sites for this gene. Higher number of nucleotide substitution per non-synonymous site has been observed at the variable-region genes of immunoglobulins [63] and some genes of the histocompatibility complex [64] but this is the first reported occurrence in the mitogenome.
3. Protein-coding genes
With the exception of cox1 and nad3, all protein coding genes start with an ATN codon, with ATG used in cox2, atp6, cox3, nad4, nad4l, nad6 and cob, ATT in nad2, atp8 and nad5 and ATA in nad1. Genes for cox1 and nad3 used TCG and GTC as initiation codons, respectively. The initiation codon for cox1 was TCG(S) in B. minax, which was observed in other Diptera species [54]. GTC being the initiation codon for nad3 was a new observation in tephritids, but it is common in other insects [65].With the exception of nad3, nad5 and nad1, all PCGs are terminated by complete stop codons: TAG is used for nad2, atp6 and cob, TAA is used for cox2, atp8, cox3, nad4, nad4l and nad6 and TA is used for cox1. The remaining genes, nad3, nad5 and nad1, are terminated by incomplete stop codons “T”.
4. Transfer RNA genes, ribosomal RNA genes and tRNA-like structure
All of 22 tRNA genes typical of metazoan mitogenomes were identified in the B. minax mitogenome, and the predicted structures are shown in Fig. 4. All tRNAs display a typical clover-leaf secondary structure, except for trnS, where the DHU arm appears to be replaced by seven unpaired nucleotides, a feature typical of other animal mitochondria [66]. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of the tertiary structure of nematode trnS suggested such aberrant tRNA can fit the ribosome by adjusting its structural conformation and function in a way similar to that of usual tRNAs in the ribosome [67].
Figure 4
Predicated secondary clover-leaf structures for the 22 tRNA genes of B. minax.
The tRNAs are labled with abbreviation of their corresponding amino acids below each tRNA gene structure. Arms of tRNAs (clockwise from top) are the amino acid acceptor arm, TΨC arm, the anticodon arm, and dihydrouridine (DHU) arm. (A) J-strand coding tRNAs. (B) N-strand coding tRNAs.
Predicated secondary clover-leaf structures for the 22 tRNA genes of B. minax.
The tRNAs are labled with abbreviation of their corresponding amino acids below each tRNA gene structure. Arms of tRNAs (clockwise from top) are the amino acid acceptor arm, TΨC arm, the anticodon arm, and dihydrouridine (DHU) arm. (A) J-strand coding tRNAs. (B) N-strand coding tRNAs.Like most insect tRNAs, all B. minax tRNAs have a length of 7 bp for the anticodon loop, 7 bp for the acceptor stem and 5 bp for anticodon stem. Most of the size variability in the B. minax tRNA genes originated from length variation in the DHU arms (loop size 4–9 bp, stem size 3–4 bp) and the TΨC arms (loop size 2–9 bp, stem size 3–5 bp); in addition, trnA and trnH contained U-U mismatches. trnS encodes an A–C mismatch, trnH encodes an A-G mismatch and trnRtrnR has a U-C mismatch in the acceptor stem. Additionally, trnV contains a U-U mismatch in the TΨC stem.Anticodon sequences were the same as in B. dorsalis, B. oleae, B. tryoni and C. capitata, which are considered common for other insects, including Gryllotalpa orientalis
[68], Philaenus spumarius
[35], Phthonandria atrilineata
[50] and Artogeia melete
[36].On the basis of the sequence similarity of B. dorsalis, the two genes coding for the small and the large ribosomal subunits were located in the B. minax mitogenome between trnL and trnV and between trnV and the CR region. The length of B. minax rrnS and rrnL was 782 bp and 1333 bp, respectively, similar to B. dorsalis, B. oleae and C. capitata.
5. Intergenic spacers
In B. minax, the two longest intergenic spacers were 42 bp between trnC and trnY and 28 bp between trnR and trnN. In B. dorsalis, the second longest intergenic spacer was 45 bp between trnC and trnY. In B. tryoni, the second longest intergenic spacer was 33 bp between trnR and trnN and the third longest intergenic spacer was 30 bp between trnC and trnY. In B. oleae, the longest intergenic spacer was 28 bp between trnR and trnN. In B. minax, however, only a 10 bp intergenic spacer was observed between trnQ and trnM, which is shorter compared to 66 bp in B. dorsalis, 71 bp in B. tryoni and 47 bp in C. capitata at the same location. Yu et al. [48] reported the 45 bp intergenic spacer located between trnC and trnY in B. dorsalis had a clear counterpart in the CR with the first 33 of 45 bp matching. These counterparts were predicted to form a small internal stem and a long stem structure pairing with the partially complementary sequence in the CR. A similar phenomenon was observed in the B. tryoni mitogenome, where both the second longest (33 bp between trnR and trnN) and the third longest intergenic spacer (30 bp between trnC and trnY) have clear counterparts (32 out of 33 bases and 25 out of 30 bases, respectively) on the N-strand of the CR. These two intergenic spacers have highly significant similarity and their counterparts were located in the same position of the CR. We asked whether the 42 bp intergenic spacer located between trnC and trnY in B. minax had these features. The first 15/42 bp of the spacer have a clear counterpart in the CR at positions 15,670–15,684. The 42 bp of intergenic spacer was predicted to form two stem-loop secondary structures with 4 bp loops and one with a 3 bp stem and the other with a 4 bp stem. The first 15 of the 42 bp formed one of the two structures; a 4 bp stem with a 4 bp loop and a 3 bp flanking sequence. The counterpart in the CR also formed a long stem structure with the neighboring sequence. Yu et al. [48] compared the 33 bp counterpart in the CR from B. dorsalis with the B. oleaeCR and found 25 of the 33 bp were identical. Surprisingly, of the original 33 bases present in the B. minaxCR, 23 were identical. Therefore, the results obtained in this study support the hypothesis that the secondary structures of the counterparts in both the intergenic spacer and the CR might have a major role in recombination [48], [69].The four intergenic spacers in B. minax, ISS-1 (18 bp between trnE and trnF), ISS-2 (14 bp between nad5 and tRNA), ISS-3 (16 bp between trnS and nad1) and ISS-4 (10 bp between nad1 and trnL), were observed to be of similar size in the tephritids B. dorsalis, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papayae, B. correcta, B. cucurbitae, B. oleae and B. tryoni (18 bp, 15 bp, 15 bp and 10 bp) and C. capitata (18 bp, 18 bp, 16 bp and 10 bp) at the same locations. All intergenic spacers were found at the same locations and have highly significant similarity in percentage identity (71.4–100%; Table 7).
Table 7
Locations, length and sequences of four shorter intergenic spacers in 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
Species
tRNAGlu- tRNAPhe
ND5 - tRNAHis,
tRNASer(UCN)- ND1
ND1 -tRNALeu(CUN)
Sequence
Size (bp)
Sequence
Size (bp)
Sequence
Size (bp)
Sequence
Size (bp)
B. minax
ACTAATTACAATTCACTA
18
TGATATATATTTCA
14
TACTAAATATAATTAC
16
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. oleae
ACTAAAATAAATACACTA
18
TGATAAATACTTCAC
15
TACTAAATAAAATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. tryoni
ACTAAATGGAATACACTA
18
TGACAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTTTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. dorsalis
ACTAAATATAATACACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTCTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. philippinensis
ACTAAATATAATGCACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTTTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. carambolae
ACTAAATATAATACACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTTTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. papayae
ACTAAATATAATACACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTTTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. correcta
ACTAAATTTTATACACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAAATTATATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
B. curcubitae
ACTAAATATAATTCACTA
18
TGATAAATATTTCAC
15
TACTAATTTTTATTA
15
AAAAAACAAG
10
C. capitata
ACTAAAAATAATTAACTA
18
TGATAAATAATTTTTCAC
18
TACTAAAATTAATTAA
16
TAAAAACAAG
10
Additionally, all four intergenic spacers have clear counterparts in the CR of the ten tephritid species (data not shown) but these intergenic spacers cannot form the secondary structures (even though some can be predicted to form stem-loop structures with 2–3 bp stems). Some earlier studies focused on longer intergenic spacers with potential secondary structure and tried to find original sequences and structures in the CR [48]. Even among the close tephritid species, however, these longer intergenic spacers had significantly different features, including sequence, length and location. Cameron et al. [70] suggested the possibility that stem-loop structures instead of tRNAs in the 3′ end of PCGs enhance the rearrangement. Two of four small intergenic spaces locate the 3′ end of PCGs without forming stem-loop structures. These results might explain why no rearrangement was found in tephritid species. This is the first report of shorter intergenic spacers with highly conserved sequences and locations among four tephritid species, which should attract more attention to the shorter intergenic spacers, even though the functions of these are not clear.
6. CR
The CR has a high A+T content among the mitochondrial genes of both vertebrates and invertebrates, and the initiation of replication is one of the most interesting features of this region [8]. Zhang and Hewitt [71] proposed conserved structural features on the basis of comparison of the CRs of one dipteran and two orthopteran species. These features include: (1) a poly(T) stretch at the 5′ end of the CR; (2) a [TA(A)]-like stretch after the poly(T) stretch; (3) a highly conserved stem-loop structure; (4) a stem-loop structure with a highly conserved flanking sequence of a TATA consensus at the 5′ end and a G(A)T consensus at the 3′ end; and (5) a G+A-rich sequence downstream of the secondary structure. The B. minaxCR was found to have three of the five features proposed by Zhang and Hewitt [71].The CR from four tephritid species, including B. minax, presented a conspicuous poly(T) stretch at the 5′ end. This sequence stretch has been found to be conserved within hymenoptera [49]. Further, the poly(T) stretch has been observed to be followed by a [TA(A)]-like stretch (Fig. 5). Our results suggest that this poly(T) region might be involved in the control of transcription and/or replication, or have some other unknown functions [10]. Additionally, a highly conserved G+A-rich sequence block was found in front of the poly(T) stretch among the four tephritid species and these sequences can be predicted to form secondary structures with a stem-loop. The highly conserved G+A-rich sequence with a poly(T) stretch nearby has been found in other dipteran and orthopteran species [71].
Figure 5
Alignment of the poly-thymidine stretch at the 5′ end of the control region described by Zhang et al. (1997) among 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
The poly-T stretch runs from nucleotide positions from 15974 to 15997 with respect to the B. minax mitogenome in the direction of 5′-3′.
Alignment of the poly-thymidine stretch at the 5′ end of the control region described by Zhang et al. (1997) among 10 tephritid species, B. oleae, B. tryoni, B. philippinensis, B. carambolae, B. papaya, B. dorsalis, C. capitata, B. minax, B. correcta and B. curcubitae.
The poly-T stretch runs from nucleotide positions from 15974 to 15997 with respect to the B. minax mitogenome in the direction of 5′-3′.In the B. minaxCR, more than ten sequences have the potential to form stem-loop structures with perfect matches and loops of variable size. In addition, several other stem-loop structures with some mismatch in the stems can be predicted. However, obvious stem-loop structures with conserved flanking sequences were not found in the CR of these ten tephritid species. In addition, The B. minaxCR does not contain any tRNA-like sequence, but contains two tandem repeats ranging in size from 33 to 45 bp. The sequence TATTAATTTTATTAAA occurred twice and the sequence CCTTTTAAATTTTCC occurred three times. The two repeats were located at positions from 15,325 to 15,357 and from 15,858 to 15,903, respectively. For other tephritid species, we found one tandem repeat in the CR of B. doraslis, B. correcta, B. curcubitae and C. capitata, two in B. philippinensis and B. carambolae, three in B. oleae and B. papaya but none in B. tryoni.
Authors: Mark Dowton; Stephen L Cameron; Jessica I Dowavic; Andy D Austin; Michael F Whiting Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Iksoo Kim; So Young Cha; Myung Hee Yoon; Jae Sam Hwang; Sang Mong Lee; Hung Dae Sohn; Byung Rae Jin Journal: Gene Date: 2005-07-04 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Stephen L Cameron; Kazunori Yoshizawa; Atsushi Mizukoshi; Michael F Whiting; Kevin P Johnson Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 3.969