Literature DB >> 24962962

Impact of continuous quality improvement initiatives on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis.

Yusheng Yu1, Yan Zhou1, Han Wang1, Tingting Zhou1, Qing Li1, Taoyu Li1, Yan Wu1, Zhihong Liu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the role of a quality improvement initiative in improving clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD).
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of 6 years of data from a hospital registry, the period between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2008 (control group) provided baseline data from before implementation of systemic outcomes monitoring, and the period between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2011 [continuous quality improvement (CQI) group] represented the time when a CQI program was in place. Peritonitis incidence, patient and technique survival, cardiovascular status, causes of death, and drop-out were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: In the 370 patients of the CQI group and the 249 patients of the control group, the predominant underlying kidney diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. After implementation of the CQI initiative, the peritonitis rate declined to 1 episode in 77.25 patient-months from 1 episode in 22.86 patient-months. Ultrasound parameters of cardiac structure were generally unchanged in the CQI group, but significant increases in cardiothoracic ratio and interventricular septal thickness were observed in the control group (both p < 0.05). Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was significantly higher in the CQI group (97.3%, 96.3%, and 96.3% respectively) than in the control group (92.6%, 82.4%, and 67.3% respectively, p < 0.001). Implementation of the CQI initiative also appeared to significantly improve technique survival rates: 95.6%, 92.6%, and 92.6% in the CQI group compared with 89.6%, 79.2%, and 76.8% in the control group (p < 0.001) after 1, 2, and 3 years respectively.
CONCLUSION: Integration of a CQI process into a PD program can significantly improve the quality of therapy and its outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous quality improvement; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962962      PMCID: PMC4076962          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  15 in total

Review 1.  Is technique survival on peritoneal dialysis better in Japan?

Authors:  Hidetomo Nakamoto; Yoshindo Kawaguchi; Hiromichi Suzuki
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk-Chun Szeto
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 3.  Effect of antihypertensive therapy on incident stroke in cohorts with prehypertensive blood pressure levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Aparna Swaminathan; Viswanath Natesan; Sara M Debanne; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts.

Authors:  S Mujais; K Story
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

5.  Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study.

Authors:  Edwina A Brown; Simon J Davies; Peter Rutherford; Frederique Meeus; Mercedes Borras; Werner Riegel; Jose C Divino Filho; Edward Vonesh; Monique van Bree
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Patient and technique survival and factors affecting mortality on peritoneal dialysis in Turkey: 12 years' experience in a single center.

Authors:  Murat Hayri Sipahioglu; Aysun Aybal; Aydin Unal; Bulent Tokgoz; Oktay Oymak; Cengiz Utas
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Comparison of peritoneal dialysis practice patterns and outcomes between a Canadian and a Chinese centre.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Jiaqi Qian; Aiwu Lin; Fadel Rowaie; Zhaohui Ni; Qiang Yao; Joanne M Bargman; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Good patient and technique survival in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Man Ching Law; Kai Ming Chow; Chi-Bon Leung; Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan; Kwok Yi Chung; Cheuk-Chun Szeto
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients: single center experience from Korea.

Authors:  Seung Hyeok Han; Jung Eun Lee; Dong Ki Kim; Sung Jin Moon; Hyun-Wook Kim; Jae Hyun Chang; Beom Seok Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Kyu Hun Choi; Ho Yung Lee; Dae Suk Han
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Improving outcome of CAPD: twenty-five years' experience in a single Korean center.

Authors:  Seung Hyeok Han; Sang Choel Lee; Song Vogue Ahn; Jung Eun Lee; Hoon Young Choi; Beom Seok Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Kyu Hun Choi; Dae Suk Han; Ho Yung Lee
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characteristics and Effectiveness of Dedicated Care Programs for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mirna Attalla; Zoe Friedman; Sandra McKeown; Ziv Harel; Jay Hingwala; Amber O Molnar; Patrick Norman; Samuel A Silver
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-09-08

2.  Catheter Insertion and Perioperative Practices Within the ISPD North American Research Consortium.

Authors:  Eric L Wallace; Rachel B Fissell; Thomas A Golper; Peter G Blake; Adriane M Lewin; Matthew J Oliver; Rob R Quinn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes.

Authors:  Aminu K Bello; Ikechi G Okpechi; Mohamed A Osman; Yeoungjee Cho; Brett Cullis; Htay Htay; Vivekanand Jha; Muhammad A Makusidi; Mignon McCulloch; Nikhil Shah; Marina Wainstein; David W Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 42.439

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.