Literature DB >> 17080107

Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts.

S Mujais1, K Story.   

Abstract

Secular trends in dialysis therapy delivery require a frequent re-examination of outcomes in patients on renal replacement modalities. We examined four large cohorts of patients initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 2000-2003 (total of >40 000 patients) to ascertain trends in patient outcomes, technique success, and predictors of both parameters of interest. Age, end-stage renal disease vintage, and diabetes were clear predictors of patient survival. Technique success was higher in patients on automated PD than in patients on continuous ambulatory PD. Center size was a powerful predictor of technique success. We conclude that the current state of PD in the United States is characterized by improving patient outcomes, higher technique success, and a predominance of use of cycler-based therapy. Several opportunities for improving technique success amenable to practice interventions have been identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17080107     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl        ISSN: 0098-6577            Impact factor:   10.545


  61 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis after cardiothoracic surgery: do it!

Authors:  Isaac Teitelbaum
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Adverse outcomes among Aboriginal patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Manish M Sood; Paul Komenda; Amy R Sood; Martina Reslerova; Mauro Verrelli; Chris Sathianathan; Loretta Eng; Amanda Eng; Claudio Rigatto
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Training of surgeons in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the United States: a national survey.

Authors:  Leslie P Wong; Scott E Liebman; Katherine A Wakefield; Susan Messing
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Peritonitis and exit site infections in First Nations patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Ainslie Hildebrand; Paul Komenda; Lisa Miller; Claudio Rigatto; Mauro Verrelli; Amy R Sood; Chris Sathianathan; Martina Reslerova; Loretta Eng; Amanda Eng; Manish M Sood
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: a story of believers and nonbelievers.

Authors:  Norbert Lameire; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Yaorong Liu; Lin Zhang; Aiwu Lin; Zhaohui Ni; Jiaqi Qian; Wei Fang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Association of Peritonitis with Hemodialysis Catheter Dependence after Modality Switch.

Authors:  Timmy Lee; Mae Thamer; Yi Zhang; Qian Zhang; Michael Allon
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Peritoneal phosphate clearance is influenced by peritoneal dialysis modality, independent of peritoneal transport characteristics.

Authors:  Sunil V Badve; Deborah L Zimmerman; Greg A Knoll; Kevin D Burns; Brendan B McCormick
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Impact of age on peritonitis risk in peritoneal dialysis patients: an era effect.

Authors:  Sharon J Nessim; Joanne M Bargman; Peter C Austin; Ken Story; Sarbjit V Jassal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.