Literature DB >> 24962740

Perceived messages about bone health after a fracture are not consistent across healthcare providers.

Joanna E M Sale1, Gillian Hawker, Cathy Cameron, Earl Bogoch, Ravi Jain, Dorcas Beaton, Susan Jaglal, Larry Funnell.   

Abstract

To examine messages perceived by members of an osteoporosis (OP) patient group from various healthcare providers regarding bone health. We conducted a phenomenological (qualitative) study in members of an OP patient group who resided in Canada, had sustained a fragility fracture at 50+ years old, and were not taking antiresorptive medication at the time of that fracture. Participants were interviewed for approximately 1 h by telephone and responded to questions about visits to healthcare providers for their bone health and what was discussed during those visits. We analyzed the data guided by Giorgi's methodology. We interviewed 28 members (2 males, 26 females; 78 % response rate), aged 51-89 years old. Most participants perceived that their specialist was more interested than their primary care physician in bone health and took the time to discuss issues with them. Participants perceived very few messages from the fracture clinic and other providers. We found many instances where perceived messages within and across various healthcare providers were inconsistent, suggesting there is a need to raise awareness of bone health management guidelines to providers who treat fracture patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962740     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-014-3079-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  19 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Differing perceptions of intervention thresholds for fracture risk: a survey of patients and doctors.

Authors:  F Douglas; K J Petrie; T Cundy; A Horne; G Gamble; A Grey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Development of the effective musculoskeletal consumer scale.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kristjansson; Peter S Tugwell; Andrew J Wilson; Peter M Brooks; S Michelle Driedger; Cindy Gallois; Annette M O'Connor; Ann Qualman; Nancy Santesso; Janet Wale; George A Wells
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Practice variation in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis: a case for more effective physician education in primary care.

Authors:  H Saadi; D Litaker; W Mills; C Kippes; B Richmond; A Licata
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

5.  Attitudes toward patient expertise in chronic illness.

Authors:  S E Thorne; K Ternulf Nyhlin; B L Paterson
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management.

Authors:  Michele Heisler; Reynard R Bouknight; Rodney A Hayward; Dylan M Smith; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Does physician communication influence older patients' diabetes self-management and glycemic control? Results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

Authors:  Michele Heisler; Ian Cole; David Weir; Eve A Kerr; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications.

Authors:  G Makoul; P Arntson; T Schofield
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Physicians' views on the influence of patient participation on treatment decisions - an explorative study.

Authors:  Elina Jaakkola
Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res       Date:  2007-08

10.  Decision to take osteoporosis medication in patients who have had a fracture and are 'high' risk for future fracture: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Monique A Gignac; Gillian Hawker; Lucy Frankel; Dorcas Beaton; Earl Bogoch; Victoria Elliot-Gibson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  12 in total

1.  The theory of planned behaviour explains intentions to use antiresorptive medication after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Cathy Cameron; Stephen Thielke; Lynn Meadows; Kevin Senior
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Men's health-seeking behaviours regarding bone health after a fragility fracture: a secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Authors:  J E M Sale; M C Ashe; D Beaton; E Bogoch; L Frankel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Metasynthesis of Patient Attitudes Toward Bone Densitometry.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Melissa Steffen; Taisha Doo; Heather S Healy; Samantha L Solimeo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Long-term experiences of pain after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  A Gheorghita; F Webster; S Thielke; J E M Sale
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Systematic scoping review of patients' perceived needs of health services for osteoporosis.

Authors:  L Chou; P Shamdasani; A M Briggs; F M Cicuttini; K Sullivan; K L M D Seneviwickrama; A E Wluka
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  A qualitative systematic review of patients' experience of osteoporosis using meta-ethnography.

Authors:  K L Barker; F Toye; C J Minns Lowe
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Qualitative Insights from the Osteoporosis Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A E Bombak; H M Hanson
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2016-11-22

Review 8.  Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Mickael Hiligsmann; Nannan Li; E Michael Lewiecki; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone Mineral Density Reporting Underestimates Fracture Risk in Ontario.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Earl Bogoch; Lynn Meadows; Monique Gignac; Lucy Frankel; Taucha Inrig; Dorcas Beaton; Ravi Jain
Journal:  Health (Irvine Calif)       Date:  2015-05

10.  Acceptability of bisphosphonates among patients, clinicians and managers: a systematic review and framework synthesis.

Authors:  Zoe Paskins; Fay Crawford-Manning; Elizabeth Cottrell; Nadia Corp; Jenny Wright; Clare Jinks; Simon Bishop; Alison Doyle; Terence Ong; Neil Gittoes; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Tessa Langley; Robert Horne; Opinder Sahota
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.