Literature DB >> 17552066

Development of the effective musculoskeletal consumer scale.

Elizabeth Kristjansson1, Peter S Tugwell, Andrew J Wilson, Peter M Brooks, S Michelle Driedger, Cindy Gallois, Annette M O'Connor, Ann Qualman, Nancy Santesso, Janet Wale, George A Wells.   

Abstract

Programs and initiatives have been created to empower, educate, and provide information to consumers; these are sometimes generically known as self-management interventions. Evaluating and comparing such programs has been a challenge, as many skills that consumers believe are important to manage and participate in their individual healthcare are not currently captured by existing tools. The objective of the Effective Musculoskeletal Consumer Project is to develop a scale to measure an effective consumer. A review of the literature, interviews, workshops, and preliminary surveys at OMERACT 7 (May 2005) were conducted in the first phases of the Project. A questionnaire consisting of 64 items was developed to measure the skills and attributes of an effective musculoskeletal (MSK) consumer. Content experts on our team reduced this scale to 48 items, which was pilot-tested with consumers from Canada and Australia. Dimensionality assessment showed that the scale was unidimensional. Classical and item response theory analyses showed that the 48-item scale had quite high reliability, but that 2 items were very poor. Based on the item analysis, 35 items were retained. The revised scale was presented at OMERACT 8, where a panel reviewed the scale and provided input. This input and another expert review by our team was used to further refine the Effective Consumer Scale to 17 items. Plans are now under way to validate this 17-item scale in self-management interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17552066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  20 in total

1.  Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Michelle T Vo; Connie S Uratsu; Karen R Estacio; Andrea Altschuler; Eileen Kim; Stacey E Alexeeff; Alyce S Adams; Julie A Schmittdiel; Michele Heisler; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Comparison of multimedia and printed patient education tools for patients with osteoporosis: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Lopez-Olivo; J K A des Bordes; H Lin; T Rizvi; R J Volk; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Patient participation in clinical encounters: a systematic review to identify self-report measures.

Authors:  Brian Mavis; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Sarah Jorgenson; John Coffey; Nandita Anand; Emi Bulica; Carolyn Marie Gaulden; Jacob Peacock; Alycia Ernst
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Development and Pilot Testing of Multimedia Patient Education Tools for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Aparna Ingleshwar; Robert J Volk; Maria Jibaja-Weiss; Andrea Barbo; Kenneth Saag; Amye Leong; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Visit Planning Using a Waiting Room Health IT Tool: The Aligning Patients and Providers Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Courtney Lyles; Connie S Uratsu; Michelle T Vo; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  [Clinical pathway for total knee arthroplasty (EGON). II. The impact of enhanced patient information].

Authors:  S Kirschner; J Lützner; V Meier; K P Günther; F Krummenauer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Translation, data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Norwegian version of the Effective Musculoskeletal Consumer Scale (EC-17).

Authors:  Bente Hamnes; Andrew Garratt; Ingvild Kjeken; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Kåre B Hagen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Perceived messages about bone health after a fracture are not consistent across healthcare providers.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Gillian Hawker; Cathy Cameron; Earl Bogoch; Ravi Jain; Dorcas Beaton; Susan Jaglal; Larry Funnell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Connie S Uratsu; Karen R Estacio; Andrea Altschuler; Eileen Kim; Bruce Fireman; Alyce S Adams; Julie A Schmittdiel; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Improving healthcare consumer effectiveness: an Animated, Self-serve, Web-based Research Tool (ANSWER) for people with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Linda C Li; Paul Adam; Anne F Townsend; Dawn Stacey; Diane Lacaille; Susan Cox; Jessie McGowan; Peter Tugwell; Gerri Sinclair; Kendall Ho; Catherine L Backman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.