Literature DB >> 24962688

Osmotolerant yeast species differ in basic physiological parameters and in tolerance of non-osmotic stresses.

Michala Bubnová1, Jana Zemančíková, Hana Sychrová.   

Abstract

Osmotolerance is the ability to grow in an environment with a high osmotic pressure. In this study we compared the physiological parameters and tolerance to osmotic and non-osmotic stresses of three osmotolerant yeast species, Debaryomyces hansenii, Pichia farinosa (sorbitophila) and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, with those of wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although the osmotolerant species did not differ significantly in their basic parameters, such as cell size or growth capacity, they had different abilities to survive anhydrobiosis, potassium limitation or the presence of toxic cationic drugs. When their osmotolerance was compared, the results revealed that some of the species isolated as sugar/polyol-tolerant (e.g.  P. farinosa) are also highly tolerant to salts and, vice versa, some strains isolated from an environment with high concentration of salt (e.g. Z. rouxii ATCC 42981) tolerate high concentrations of sugars. None of the tested strains and species was osmophilic. Taken together, our results showed that P. farinosa (sorbitophila) is the most robust species when coping with various stresses, while Z. rouxii CBS 732, although osmotolerant in general, is not specifically salt-tolerant and is quite sensitive to most of the tested stress conditions.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  desiccation survival; non-conventional yeasts; oxidative stress; salt stress; yeast osmotolerance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962688     DOI: 10.1002/yea.3024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  8 in total

1.  Enhancement of glycerol production by UV-mutagenesis of the marine yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus HH16: kinetics and optimization of the fermentation process.

Authors:  Heba Hawary; Abdel-Hamied M Rasmey; Akram A Aboseidah; El-Shahat El-Morsi; Mohamed Hafez
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of a salt-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant obtained by evolutionary engineering.

Authors:  Seyma Hande Tekarslan-Sahin; Ceren Alkim; Tugba Sezgin
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Four Saccharomyces species differ in their tolerance to various stresses though they have similar basic physiological parameters.

Authors:  Jana Zemančíková; Marie Kodedová; Klára Papoušková; Hana Sychrová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Phenotypic landscape of non-conventional yeast species for different stress tolerance traits desirable in bioethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Vaskar Mukherjee; Dorota Radecka; Guido Aerts; Kevin J Verstrepen; Bart Lievens; Johan M Thevelein
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 5.  The cell wall and the response and tolerance to stresses of biotechnological relevance in yeasts.

Authors:  Ricardo A Ribeiro; Nuno Bourbon-Melo; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Extreme Osmotolerance and Halotolerance in Food-Relevant Yeasts and the Role of Glycerol-Dependent Cell Individuality.

Authors:  Malcolm Stratford; Hazel Steels; Michaela Novodvorska; David B Archer; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Periprotein lipidomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide a flexible environment for conformational changes of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Joury S van 't Klooster; Tan-Yun Cheng; Hendrik R Sikkema; Aike Jeucken; Branch Moody; Bert Poolman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Effects of carbon concentration, oxygen, and controlled pH on the engineering strain Lactiplantibacillus casei E1 in the production of bioethanol from sugarcane molasses.

Authors:  Song Wang; Ran Tian; Buwei Liu; Hongcai Wang; Jun Liu; Chenghui Li; Mingyue Li; Smith Etareri Evivie; Bailiang Li
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.