Literature DB >> 32132877

Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research.

Keely Maxwell1, Bryan Hubbell2, Emily Eisenhauer3.   

Abstract

Solving complex environmental problems requires interdisciplinary research involving the social and environmental sciences. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is working toward solutions-driven research and interdisciplinary integration within its Office of Research and Development. This article details the history of this process and discusses lessons learned from other federal agencies seeking to integrate social and biophysical research: finding the right combination of top down and bottom up approaches; balancing objectives of advancing science and/or supporting programmatic operations; using social science methods to inform the process; and engaging multiple stakeholders. Attention to the social context of scientific practice, including research processes and research use, fosters success. Three strategies for integrating social sciences to support solutions-driven environmental research are: weaving social science throughout the research process, strengthening social networks, and fostering interdisciplinary hubs. Integration into planning and carrying out research has greater transformative potential than integration into product development and distribution. This article provides insights into institutional considerations for advancing interdisciplinarity and the social context of scientific practice in government agencies. It illustrates the multiple decision contexts and inclusion of social science at the science-policy interface.

Keywords:  Environmental social science; Institutional science; Interdisciplinary research; Solutions-driven research

Year:  2019        PMID: 32132877      PMCID: PMC7055515          DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Policy        ISSN: 1462-9011            Impact factor:   5.581


  22 in total

1.  How to solve the world's biggest problems.

Authors:  Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse collaboration.

Authors:  Rebekah R Brown; Ana Deletic; Tony H F Wong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sustainability: Map the evidence.

Authors:  Madeleine C McKinnon; Samantha H Cheng; Ruth Garside; Yuta J Masuda; Daniel C Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Risk communication for public health emergencies.

Authors:  Deborah C Glik
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  A resilience framework for chronic exposures: water quality and ecosystem services in coastal social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Merrill; Kate K Mulvaney; David M Martin; Marnita M Chintala; Walter Berry; Timothy Gleason; Stephen Balogh; Austin Humphries
Journal:  Coast Manage       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.922

6.  Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use.

Authors:  Bryan J Hubbell; Amanda Kaufman; Louie Rivers; Kayla Schulte; Gayle Hagler; Jane Clougherty; Wayne Cascio; Dan Costa
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups.

Authors:  Keely Maxwell; Brittany Kiessling; Jenifer Buckley
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 6.793

8.  Chemical Risk Assessment: Traditional vs Public Health Perspectives.

Authors:  Maureen R Gwinn; Daniel A Axelrad; Tina Bahadori; David Bussard; Wayne E Cascio; Kacee Deener; David Dix; Russell S Thomas; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas A Burke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Interweaving Knowledge Resources to Address Complex Environmental Health Challenges.

Authors:  Beth Ellen Anderson; Marisa F Naujokas; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  How to Conduct and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.