Literature DB >> 24960047

Trial history effects in the ventral attentional network.

Paige E Scalf1, JeeWon Ahn, Diane M Beck, Alejandro Lleras.   

Abstract

The ventral attentional network (VAN) is thought to drive "stimulus driven attention" [e.g., Asplund, C. L., Todd, J. J., Snyder, A. P., & Marois, R. A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 507-512, 2010; Shulman, G. L., McAvoy, M. P., Cowan, M. C., Astafiev, S. V., Tansy, A. P., D' Avossa, G., et al. Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3384-3397, 2003]; in other words, it instantiates within the current stimulus environment the top-down attentional biases maintained by the dorsal attention network [e.g., Kincade, J. M., Abrams, R. A., Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 25, 4593-4604, 2005]. Previous work has shown that the dorsal attentional network is sensitive to trial history, such that it is challenged by changes in task goals and facilitated by repetition thereof [e.g., Kristjánsson, A., Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Macaluso, E., & Driver, J. Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1612-1624, 2007]. Here, we investigate whether the VAN also preserves information across trials such that it is challenged when previously rejected stimuli become task relevant. We used fMRI to investigate the sensitivity of the ventral attentional system to prior history effects as measured by the distractor preview effect. This behavioral phenomenon reflects a bias against stimuli that have historically not supported task performance. We found regions traditionally considered to be part of the VAN (right middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus and right supramarginal gyrus) [Shulman, G. L., McAvoy, M. P., Cowan, M. C., Astafiev, S. V., Tansy, A. P., D' Avossa, G., et al. Quantitative analysis of attention and detection signals during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3384-3397, 2003] to be more active when task-relevant stimuli had not supported task performance in a previous trial than when they had. Investigations of the ventral visual system suggest that this effect is more reliably driven by trial history preserved within the VAN than that preserved within the visual system per se. We conclude that VAN maintains its interactions with top-down stimulus biases and bottom-up stimulation across time, allowing previous experience with the stimulus environment to influence attentional biases under current circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24960047     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive function: holarchy or holacracy?

Authors:  Codruta Birle; Dana Slavoaca; Maria Balea; Livia Livint Popa; Ioana Muresanu; Emanuel Stefanescu; Vitalie Vacaras; Constantin Dina; Stefan Strilciuc; Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu; Dafin F Muresanu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  "Cerebellar contribution to visuo-attentional alpha rhythm: insights from weightlessness".

Authors:  A M Cebolla; M Petieau; B Dan; L Balazs; J McIntyre; G Cheron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Synchronization within, and interactions between, the default mode and dorsal attention networks in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Muhua Huang; Fuqing Zhou; Lin Wu; Bo Wang; Hui Wan; Fangjun Li; Xianjun Zeng; Honghan Gong
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 5.  Prefrontal contributions to the stability and variability of thought and conscious experience.

Authors:  Andre Zamani; Robin Carhart-Harris; Kalina Christoff
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Prediction of childhood maltreatment and subtypes with personalized functional connectome of large-scale brain networks.

Authors:  Jiang Zhang; Tianyu Zhao; Jingyue Zhang; Zhiwei Zhang; Hongming Li; Bochao Cheng; Yajing Pang; Huawang Wu; Jiaojian Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.399

7.  Modeling the effect of selection history on pop-out visual search.

Authors:  Yuan-Chi Tseng; Joshua I Glaser; Eamon Caddigan; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Not all "distractor" tags are created equal: using a search asymmetry to dissociate the inter-trial effects caused by different forms of distractors.

Authors:  Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.