Machelle T Pardue1, Claire S Barnes2, Moon K Kim2, Moe H Aung3, Raj Amarnath4, Darin E Olson5, Peter M Thulé5. 1. Rehab R&D Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA ; Neuroscience Program, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 2. Rehab R&D Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA ; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3. Neuroscience Program, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 4. Rehab R&D Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA. 5. Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA ; Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, & Lipids, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of low luminance stimuli to functionally probe inner retinal rod pathways in the context of diabetes mellitus in both rat and human subjects. METHODS: Inner retinal dysfunction was assessed using oscillatory potential (OP) delays in diabetic rats. Scotopic electroretinograms (ERGs) in response to a series of increasing flash luminances were recorded from streptozotocin (STZ)-treated and control Sprague-Dawley rats after 7, 14, 20, and 29 weeks of hyperglycemia. We then evaluated OP delays in human diabetic subjects with (DR) and without (DM) diabetic retinopathy using the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology in Vision (ISCEV) standard scotopic protocol and two additional dim test flashes. RESULTS: Beginning 7 weeks after STZ, OP implicit times in diabetic rats were progressively delayed in response to dim, but not bright stimuli. In many diabetic subjects the standard ISCEV dim flash failed to illicit measureable OPs. However, OPs became measurable using a brighter, nonstandard dim flash (Test Flash 1, -1.43 log cd s/m2), and exhibited prolonged implicit times in the DM group compared with control subjects (CTRL). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in scotopic OP implicit times are an early response to hyperglycemia in diabetic rats. A similar, inner retinal, rod-driven response was detected in diabetic human subjects without diabetic retinopathy, only when a nonstandard ISCEV flash intensity was employed during ERG testing. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The addition of a dim stimulus to standard ISCEV flashes with assessment of OP latency during ERG testing may provide a detection method for early retinal dysfunction in diabetic patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of low luminance stimuli to functionally probe inner retinal rod pathways in the context of diabetes mellitus in both rat and human subjects. METHODS: Inner retinal dysfunction was assessed using oscillatory potential (OP) delays in diabetic rats. Scotopic electroretinograms (ERGs) in response to a series of increasing flash luminances were recorded from streptozotocin (STZ)-treated and control Sprague-Dawley rats after 7, 14, 20, and 29 weeks of hyperglycemia. We then evaluated OP delays in human diabetic subjects with (DR) and without (DM) diabetic retinopathy using the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology in Vision (ISCEV) standard scotopic protocol and two additional dim test flashes. RESULTS: Beginning 7 weeks after STZ, OP implicit times in diabetic rats were progressively delayed in response to dim, but not bright stimuli. In many diabetic subjects the standard ISCEV dim flash failed to illicit measureable OPs. However, OPs became measurable using a brighter, nonstandard dim flash (Test Flash 1, -1.43 log cd s/m2), and exhibited prolonged implicit times in the DM group compared with control subjects (CTRL). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in scotopic OP implicit times are an early response to hyperglycemia in diabetic rats. A similar, inner retinal, rod-driven response was detected in diabetic human subjects without diabetic retinopathy, only when a nonstandard ISCEV flash intensity was employed during ERG testing. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The addition of a dim stimulus to standard ISCEV flashes with assessment of OP latency during ERG testing may provide a detection method for early retinal dysfunction in diabetic patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
diabetic retinopathy; electroretinography; rod vision
Authors: Elizabeth P Moran; Zhongxiao Wang; Jing Chen; Przemyslaw Sapieha; Lois E H Smith; Jian-Xing Ma Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Rachael S Allen; Adam M Hanif; Marissa A Gogniat; Brian C Prall; Raza Haider; Moe H Aung; Megan C Prunty; Lukas M Mees; Monica M Coulter; Cara T Motz; Jeffrey H Boatright; Machelle T Pardue Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Nicholas C Holoman; Jacob J Aiello; Timothy D Trobenter; Matthew J Tarchick; Michael R Kozlowski; Emily R Makowski; Darryl C De Vivo; Charandeep Singh; Jonathan E Sears; Ivy S Samuels Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Dustin R Masser; Laura Otalora; Nicholas W Clark; Michael T Kinter; Michael H Elliott; Willard M Freeman Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Ivy S Samuels; Jose-Andres C Portillo; Yanling Miao; Timothy S Kern; Carlos S Subauste Journal: Vis Neurosci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.241