Literature DB >> 24958227

Prey pursuit strategy of Japanese horseshoe bats during an in-flight target-selection task.

Yuki Kinoshita1, Daiki Ogata, Yoshiaki Watanabe, Hiroshi Riquimaroux, Tetsuo Ohta, Shizuko Hiryu.   

Abstract

The prey pursuit behavior of Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) was investigated by tasking bats during flight with choosing between two tethered fluttering moths. Echolocation pulses were recorded using a telemetry microphone mounted on the bat combined with a 17-channel horizontal microphone array to measure pulse directions. Flight paths of the bat and moths were monitored using two high-speed video cameras. Acoustical measurements of returning echoes from fluttering moths were first collected using an ultrasonic loudspeaker, turning the head direction of the moth relative to the loudspeaker from 0° (front) to 180° (back) in the horizontal plane. The amount of acoustical glints caused by moth fluttering varied with the sound direction, reaching a maximum at 70°-100° in the horizontal plane. In the flight experiment, moths chosen by the bat fluttered within or moved across these angles relative to the bat's pulse direction, which would cause maximum dynamic changes in the frequency and amplitude of acoustical glints during flight. These results suggest that echoes with acoustical glints containing the strongest frequency and amplitude modulations appear to attract bats for prey selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24958227     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0921-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  9 in total

1.  Echolocation behavior of the Japanese horseshoe bat in pursuit of fluttering prey.

Authors:  Shigeki Mantani; Shizuko Hiryu; Emyo Fujioka; Naohiro Matsuta; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Doppler-shift compensation in the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) recorded with a telemetry microphone system during flight.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Koji Katsura; Liang-Kong Lin; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Yu Shiori; Tatsuro Hosokawa; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Adaptive beam-width control of echolocation sounds by CF-FM bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon, during prey-capture flight.

Authors:  Naohiro Matsuta; Shizuko Hiryu; Emyo Fujioka; Yasufumi Yamada; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Echolocation signals of the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in transfer flight and during landing.

Authors:  B Tian; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Ultrasonic vocalizations of flying bats monitored by radiotelemetry.

Authors:  W C Lancaster; A W Keating; O W Henson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Respiratory muscle activity in relation to vocalization in flying bats.

Authors:  W C Lancaster; O W Henson; A W Keating
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Effect of echolocation behavior-related constant frequency-frequency modulation sound on the frequency tuning of inferior collicular neurons in Hipposideros armiger.

Authors:  Jia Tang; Zi-Ying Fu; Chen-Xue Wei; Qi-Cai Chen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Theoretical investigation of active listening behavior based on the echolocation of CF-FM bats.

Authors:  Takahiro Hiraga; Yasufumi Yamada; Ryo Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  The Killer Fly Hunger Games: Target Size and Speed Predict Decision to Pursuit.

Authors:  Trevor J Wardill; Katie Knowles; Laura Barlow; Gervasio Tapia; Karin Nordström; Robert M Olberg; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Species-specific control of acoustic gaze by echolocating bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon and Pipistrellus abramus, during flight.

Authors:  Yasufumi Yamada; Shizuko Hiryu; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.