Literature DB >> 24956926

Shared signatures of social stress and aging in peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression profiles.

Noah Snyder-Mackler1, Mehmet Somel, Jenny Tung.   

Abstract

Chronic social stress is a predictor of both aging-related disease and mortality risk. Hence, chronic stress has been hypothesized to directly exacerbate the process of physiological aging. Here, we evaluated this hypothesis at the level of gene regulation. We compared two data sets of genome-wide gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs): one that captured aging effects and another that focused on chronic social stress. Overall, we found that the direction, although not necessarily the magnitude, of significant gene expression changes tends to be shared between the two data sets. This overlap was observable at three levels: (i) individual genes; (ii) general functional categories of genes; and (iii) molecular pathways implicated in aging. However, we also found evidence that heterogeneity in PBMC composition limits the power to detect more extensive similarities, suggesting that our findings reflect an underestimate of the degree to which age and social stress influence gene regulation in parallel. Cell type-specific data on gene regulation will be important to overcome this limitation in the future studies.
© 2014 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; gene expression; social stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24956926      PMCID: PMC4172541          DOI: 10.1111/acel.12239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Cell        ISSN: 1474-9718            Impact factor:   9.304


The major causes of chronic social stress—low social status, social isolation, and lack of social support—are also linked to higher rates of age-related disease and mortality (House et al., 1988; Shaw et al., 1999; Sapolsky, 2004; Marmot, 2006; Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010). This observation has given rise to the hypothesis that social stress influences the aging process, potentially by affecting the same biological pathways that change during aging. This idea predicts, first, that biomarkers of social stress should also be biomarkers of aging and, second, that the direction of social stress effects on these biomarkers should recapitulate changes with age (Bauer, 2008). Both predictions are supported for a few well-characterized biomarkers, such as IL-6 and telomerase protein levels (Epel et al., 2004; Piazza et al., 2010; Needham et al., 2012; Zalli et al., 2014). However, we do not yet know the extent to which these patterns hold more broadly—information that is key for understanding how social stress impacts the aging process. Here, we compared two previously published data sets to investigate the relationship between chronic social stress and aging for thousands of genes simultaneously. Both data sets measured genome-wide gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The first, a study of 1240 humans 15–94 years old, captured the effect of age on gene expression (Göring et al., 2007; Hong et al., 2008). The second involved experimental manipulation of dominance rank (i.e., social status) in 49 rhesus macaques and allowed us to identify genes associated with the response to rank-induced chronic social stress (Tung et al., 2012). Importantly, the physiological consequences of both aging and social stress in nonhuman primates often parallel those observed in humans (Roth et al., 2004; Sapolsky, 2005), including at the level of gene expression (Somel et al., 2010; Tung & Gilad, 2013). Thus, by comparing gene expression levels between the two data sets, we were able to test whether social stress recapitulates the effects of aging. To do so, we focused on the set of genes (n = 4252) included in both data sets. Overall, we found a significant enrichment of genes that were either consistently upregulated or consistently downregulated in both older and lower status individuals (odds ratio = 1.37, Fisher’s exact test, FET, P = 3.7 × 10−7). This enrichment was even stronger (OR = 2.14, FET P = 3.0 × 10−7) for the 819 genes that were independently and significantly associated with both variables at a 20% false discovery rate (see Data S1 and Table S2 for similar results using alternative FDR thresholds). Interestingly, some of the genes that were identified in this analysis (Table S1) are also known biomarkers of aging [e.g., B2M and NF-IL6: (Ershler & Keller, 2000; Annweiler et al., 2011)]. In contrast, the magnitude of age and rank effects were not significantly correlated, either across all 4252 genes (Spearman’s ρ = 0.065, permutation test P = 0.21) or among the 819 genes significantly associated with both age and social stress (Spearman’s ρ = 0.062, P = 0.36). This observation might be interpreted in two, nonmutually exclusive ways. First, while aging and chronic social stress influence similar genes, their exact impact on these genes may differ. A second likely possibility is that parallels at the level of direction rather than magnitude are more readily detectable across data sets, especially those obtained from different species and using different sampling methods. In addition to directional similarities at the level of individual genes, social stress and aging could affect similar biological pathways. To test this possibility, we used Gene Ontology (GO) terms (specifically, high-level ‘GO Slim’ categories) to identify functionally related sets of genes that were over-represented among significant genes in each of the two data sets (Ashburner et al., 2000). Twenty-nine gene sets were enriched in both cases. Twenty-seven of these ‘co-enriched’ gene categories were similarly affected by social status and age (i.e., either both associated with upregulation or both associated with downregulation with increasing age and lower social status), which was significantly greater than expected by chance (permutation test P < 0.0001; Table 1). Only two co-enriched categories, ‘reproduction’ and ‘ATPase activity’, were enriched in both data sets in a manner inconsistent with our motivating hypothesis, no more than expected by chance (P = 0.79).
Table 1

Co-enriched gene ontology slim categories

Gene ontology categoryOR (FET P-value)Rho§ (Spearman’s correlation P-value)Genes compared (n)
Upregulated in both
 Signal transduction (BP)1.20 (P = 0.08)1047
 Plasma membrane (CC)1.22 (P = 0.09)878
 Response to stress (BP)1.19 (P = 0.12)828
 Immune system process (BP)1.13 (P = 0.28)491
 Transferase activity, transferring acyl groups (MF)1.51 (P = 0.29)0.31 (P = 0.01)63
 Cytoplasmic membrane-bounded vesicle (CC)1.19 (P = 0.29)0.15 (P = 0.02)251
 Cell morphogenesis (BP)0.99 (P = 0.57)166
 Nucleic acid-binding transcription factor activity (MF)0.96 (P = 0.61)247
 Signal transducer activity (MF)0.95 (P = 0.62)287
 Kinase activity (MF)0.94 (P = 0.64)267
 Homeostatic process (BP)0.93 (P = 0.65)264
 Plasma membrane organization (BP)0.68 (P = 0.82)16
Downregulated in both
 Nucleus (CC)1.46 (P = 4.9 × 105)0.09 (P = 8.4 × 105)1794
 Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process (BP)1.53 (P = 9.9 × 105)0.09 (P = 6.3 × 104)1308
 Translation factor activity, nucleic acid binding (MF)8.19 (P = 5.4 × 103)0.32 (P = 4.7 × 102)39
 Nuclear envelope (CC)3.02 (P = 9.1 × 103)0.33 (P = 9.6 × 104)97
 Nucleolus (CC)2.04 (P = 1.4 × 102)0.16 (P = 2.7 × 102)186
 RNA binding (MF)1.81 (P = 1.8 × 10−2)270
 Translation (BP)3.01 (P = 2.2 × 10−2)111
 Protein transporter activity (MF)2.45 (P = 0.16)38
 Ribosome (CC)2.09 (P = 0.17)63
 Nucleoplasm (CC)1.16 (P = 0.22)510
 Methyltransferase activity (MF)1.81 (P = 0.25)60
 Ribonucleoprotein complex assembly (BP)2.26 (P = 0.3)29
 Ribosome biogenesis (BP)2.57 (P = 0.32)35
 DNA binding (MF)1.08 (P = 0.35)610
 mRNA processing (BP)0.51 (P = 0.96)130

Co-enriched GO Slim categories for genes that are both upregulated or downregulated with age and low rank. The corresponding GO domain is in parentheses: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF). Shaded rows designate categories in which the effects of aging and social stress are more often concordant than not. Categories with significant FET ORs or significant correlations are indicated in bold.

Fisher’s exact test (FET) odds ratio assessing the directional concordance of effects of aging and chronic social stress on gene expression levels for genes within each co-enriched category.

Significant correlations (Spearman’s rho) between the effects of aging and chronic social stress on gene expression levels for genes within each co-enriched category.

Co-enriched gene ontology slim categories Co-enriched GO Slim categories for genes that are both upregulated or downregulated with age and low rank. The corresponding GO domain is in parentheses: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF). Shaded rows designate categories in which the effects of aging and social stress are more often concordant than not. Categories with significant FET ORs or significant correlations are indicated in bold. Fisher’s exact test (FET) odds ratio assessing the directional concordance of effects of aging and chronic social stress on gene expression levels for genes within each co-enriched category. Significant correlations (Spearman’s rho) between the effects of aging and chronic social stress on gene expression levels for genes within each co-enriched category. Because the co-enriched categories were quite broad, we also investigated gene sets linked to well-studied aging-related pathways to test whether they, too, were co-enriched across data sets. Specifically, we investigated gene sets connected to known hallmarks of aging, including inflammation, insulin growth factor signaling, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, RNA processing, telomere maintenance, mitochondrial senescence, and oxidative stress (López-Otín et al., 2013). We found fifteen co-enriched gene sets that were either both upregulated or both downregulated with aging and chronic social stress (Table S3; permutation test P = 2.8 × 10−3) and none that exhibited the opposite pattern. We then asked whether genes within each category show concordance in the direction of effects across data sets (i.e., concordantly increased or concordantly decreased shifts with older age and lower dominance rank). We identified significant concordance within individual co-enriched GO Slim categories for seven gene sets (Table 1). Furthermore, genes in 22 of the 27 co-enriched GO Slim categories were more often concordant than discordant (binomial test: P = 1.5 × 10−3). Categories previously linked to aging exhibited a similar pattern (10 of 12, excluding categories with ties; P = 3.9 × 10−2; Table S3). Thus, in PBMCs, aging and chronic social stress appear to influence a similar set of both broad categories of genes as well as specific pathways previously implicated in aging. However, we consistently found that directional similarities were more common, and/or easier to detect, than correlations in effect size: only seven of the 27 co-enriched GO Slim categories, and none of the 15 aging-related categories exhibited significant effect size correlations in the predicted direction (Tables 1 and S3). This may be because age and social stress do not alter the same genes within pathways affected by both conditions. Alternatively, discordant changes in PBMC composition between aged and socially stressed individuals might mask parallel changes in gene expression within individual cell types (suggesting that some, but not all, aspects of physiological changes with aging and chronic social stress are shared). Indeed, cell-type composition data from the macaque social stress experiment revealed a significant correlation between cytotoxic T-cell proportions and dominance rank (lower ranking individuals had proportionally fewer of these cells: Tung et al., 2012). While T-cell proportions also change with age, they may not do so in a completely parallel manner to that observed with social stress: Depletion of naïve T cells during aging, for example, has been hypothesized to result from accumulated exposure to pathogens over the life course, a mechanism unlikely to be at work in the social stress data set (Larbi et al., 2008). To test whether differences in PBMC composition affected our analysis, we therefore quantified how uniformly each gene was expressed across PBMC cell types. For each gene, we calculated an ‘evenness’ metric, e, (Haygood et al., 2010) using publicly available gene expression data from each of the five major PBMC cell types in humans (Watkins et al., 2009) (SI). We found that, while the subset of genes that were the most evenly expressed (e > 0.90; n = 555 genes) exhibited strong concordance between the directional effects of aging and social status (OR = 2.45, FET P = 1.1 × 10−6), this pattern was undetectable among unevenly expressed genes (e < 0.90; n = 257 genes, OR = 1.27, FET P = 0.42). Further, genes in co-enriched categories that were both concordant in direction and significantly correlated between data sets were much more evenly expressed than genes in categories that had concordant, but not significantly correlated effects [Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test, D = 0.061, P = 1.3 × 10−4]. In turn, genes in both of these sets were more evenly expressed than genes in categories that had discordant effects (K-S test, D = 0.058, P = 0.012; Fig. 1; see Fig. S1 for aging-related categories). Thus, cell-type composition may confound the ability to detect parallels between aging effects and social stress effects for genes with higher levels of tissue-specific expression bias.
Figure 1

Genes in concordant and significantly correlated co-enriched categories (solid line) are the most evenly expressed across tissues. The ‘evenness score’ measures the degree to which a gene is expressed at the same level across cell types, ranging from 0 (the gene is expressed in only one cell type) to 1 (the gene is equally expressed across the 5 PBMC cell types we considered). Genes in concordant and significantly correlated categories were significantly more evenly expressed than genes in concordant, uncorrelated categories (Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test, D = 0.061, P = 1.3 × 10−4), which were in turn significantly more evenly expressed than genes in discordant, uncorrelated categories (K-S test, D = 0.058, P = 1.2 × 10−2). The x-axis is plotted on a negative log scale.

Genes in concordant and significantly correlated co-enriched categories (solid line) are the most evenly expressed across tissues. The ‘evenness score’ measures the degree to which a gene is expressed at the same level across cell types, ranging from 0 (the gene is expressed in only one cell type) to 1 (the gene is equally expressed across the 5 PBMC cell types we considered). Genes in concordant and significantly correlated categories were significantly more evenly expressed than genes in concordant, uncorrelated categories (Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test, D = 0.061, P = 1.3 × 10−4), which were in turn significantly more evenly expressed than genes in discordant, uncorrelated categories (K-S test, D = 0.058, P = 1.2 × 10−2). The x-axis is plotted on a negative log scale. Together, our findings combine to provide support for the hypothesis that social stress broadly recapitulates the physiological effects of aging, at least at the level of gene expression. Thus, this pattern is not restricted to a small set of well-studied biomarkers, but instead appears to be a more general characteristic of cellular physiology. Our analysis also reveals that cell-type-biased gene expression and tissue heterogeneity are likely to hamper the detection of such shared signals, especially at the level of individual genes. Genomic approaches that incorporate controlled, cell-type-specific analyses that focus on aging and chronic social stress effects in the same species—particularly in humans—should help further uncover physiological changes that link social stress to aging and thus social environmental effects to survival and longevity.
  23 in total

1.  Accelerated risk of hypertensive blood pressure recordings among Alzheimer caregivers.

Authors:  W S Shaw; T L Patterson; M G Ziegler; J E Dimsdale; S J Semple; I Grant
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Contrasts between adaptive coding and noncoding changes during human evolution.

Authors:  Ralph Haygood; Courtney C Babbitt; Olivier Fedrigo; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The influence of social hierarchy on primate health.

Authors:  Robert M Sapolsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Chronic stress and immunosenescence: a review.

Authors:  Moisés Evandro Bauer
Journal:  Neuroimmunomodulation       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.492

Review 5.  Aging of the immune system as a prognostic factor for human longevity.

Authors:  Anis Larbi; Claudio Franceschi; Dawn Mazzatti; Rafael Solana; Anders Wikby; Graham Pawelec
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2008-04

6.  Discovery of expression QTLs using large-scale transcriptional profiling in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Harald H H Göring; Joanne E Curran; Matthew P Johnson; Thomas D Dyer; Jac Charlesworth; Shelley A Cole; Jeremy B M Jowett; Lawrence J Abraham; David L Rainwater; Anthony G Comuzzie; Michael C Mahaney; Laura Almasy; Jean W MacCluer; Ahmed H Kissebah; Gregory R Collier; Eric K Moses; John Blangero
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Social relationships and health.

Authors:  J S House; K R Landis; D Umberson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Status syndrome: a challenge to medicine.

Authors:  Michael G Marmot
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Transcriptome-wide assessment of human brain and lymphocyte senescence.

Authors:  Mun-Gwan Hong; Amanda J Myers; Patrik K E Magnusson; Jonathan A Prince
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A HaemAtlas: characterizing gene expression in differentiated human blood cells.

Authors:  Nicholas A Watkins; Arief Gusnanto; Bernard de Bono; Subhajyoti De; Diego Miranda-Saavedra; Debbie L Hardie; Will G J Angenent; Antony P Attwood; Peter D Ellis; Wendy Erber; Nicola S Foad; Stephen F Garner; Clare M Isacke; Jennifer Jolley; Kerstin Koch; Iain C Macaulay; Sarah L Morley; Augusto Rendon; Kate M Rice; Niall Taylor; Daphne C Thijssen-Timmer; Marloes R Tijssen; C Ellen van der Schoot; Lorenz Wernisch; Thilo Winzer; Frank Dudbridge; Christopher D Buckley; Cordelia F Langford; Sarah Teichmann; Berthold Göttgens; Willem H Ouwehand
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pervasive Effects of Aging on Gene Expression in Wild Wolves.

Authors:  Pauline Charruau; Rachel A Johnston; Daniel R Stahler; Amanda Lea; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Douglas W Smith; Bridgett M vonHoldt; Steven W Cole; Jenny Tung; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Rhesus macaques as a tractable physiological model of human ageing.

Authors:  Kenneth L Chiou; Michael J Montague; Elisabeth A Goldman; Marina M Watowich; Sierra N Sams; Jeff Song; Julie E Horvath; Kirstin N Sterner; Angelina V Ruiz-Lambides; Melween I Martínez; James P Higham; Lauren J N Brent; Michael L Platt; Noah Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The systemic environment: at the interface of aging and adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Lucas K Smith; Charles W White; Saul A Villeda
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Epigenomics and gene regulation in mammalian social systems.

Authors:  Tania P Guerrero; Jörns Fickel; Sarah Benhaiem; Alexandra Weyrich
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Natural disaster and immunological aging in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  Marina M Watowich; Kenneth L Chiou; Michael J Montague; Noah D Simons; Julie E Horvath; Angelina V Ruiz-Lambides; Melween I Martínez; James P Higham; Lauren J N Brent; Michael L Platt; Noah Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 6.  Social ageing: exploring the drivers of late-life changes in social behaviour in mammals.

Authors:  Erin R Siracusa; James P Higham; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Insights from evolutionarily relevant models for human ageing.

Authors:  Melissa Emery Thompson; Alexandra G Rosati; Noah Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.