| Literature DB >> 24955370 |
Saravana Kumar Jaganathan1, Hemanth Mohandas2, Gunalan Sivakumar2, Palaniappan Kasi2, Theertha Sudheer2, Sruthi Avineri Veetil2, Selvakumar Murugesan3, Eko Supriyanto1.
Abstract
Blood compatibility of metallocene polyethylene (mPE) was investigated after modifying the surface using hydrochloric acid. Contact angle of the mPE exposed to HCl poses a decrease in its value which indicates increasing wettability and better blood compatibility. Surface of mPE analyzed by using FTIR revealed no significant changes in its functional groups after treatment. Furthermore, scanning electron microscope images supported the increasing wettability through the modifications like pit formations and etching on the acid rendered surface. To evaluate the effect of acid treatment on the coagulation cascade, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were measured. Both PT and APTT were delayed significantly (P < 0.05) after 60 min exposure implying improved blood compatibility of the surfaces. Hemolysis assay of the treated surface showed a remarkable decrease in the percentage of lysis of red blood cells when compared with untreated surface. Moreover, platelet adhesion assay demonstrated that HCl exposed surfaces deter the attachment of platelets and thereby reduce the chances of activation of blood coagulation cascade. These results confirmed the enhanced blood compatibility of mPE after HCl exposure which can be utilized for cardiovascular implants like artificial vascular prostheses, implants, and various blood contacting devices.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24955370 PMCID: PMC4053302 DOI: 10.1155/2014/963149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Contact angle measurement of the mPE before and after HCl treatment.
| S. Number | Sample | Average contact angle in degrees* |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Untreated mPE | 86.12 ± 2.16 |
| 2 | mPE treated with | 70.18 ± 1.85 |
| 3 | mPE treated with | 54.07 ± 1.12 |
Data represents mean ± S.D; *Mean differences are significant at P < 0.05, (n = 3).
Figure 1A representative FTIR spectra of untreated and 60 min HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene.
Figure 2Representative SEM micrographs of untreated and HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene.
Figure 3Comparison of prothrombin time (PT) of untreated and HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene (n = 3). Values shown are mean ± SD and ∗ indicates difference in the mean is significant with P < 0.05.
Figure 4Comparison of activated partial thromboplastin time (APPT) of untreated and HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene (n = 3). Values shown are mean ± SD and ∗ indicates differences in the mean are significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Comparison of percentage of hemolysis of untreated and HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene (n = 3). Values shown are mean ± SD and ∗ indicates differences in the mean are significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 6Platelet adhesion assay of untreated and HCl-treated metallocene polyethylene (n = 3). Figure 6(a) indicates the number of platelets adhered on the untreated and 60 min HCl exposed surface and values are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ Differences in the means are significant with P < 0.05. Figure 6(b) shows photomicrograph of untreated and 60 min HCl-treated mPE at 40x magnification.