| Literature DB >> 24955092 |
Alekhya Sabbithi1, R Naveen Kumar1, L Kashinath1, V Bhaskar2, V Sudershan Rao1.
Abstract
A study has been done to analyse the microbiological quality of salads served along with street foods of Hyderabad. A total of 163 salad samples, 53 of carrot and 110 of onion samples, were collected from four different zones of Hyderabad. About 74% and 56% had Staphylococcus aureus in carrots and onions, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of carrots and forty-five percent of onions samples contained Salmonella, 68% of carrots and 24% of onions had Yersinia. HACCP study was carried out with 6 street food vendors to identify the source of Salmonella contamination in salads. Food handlers were found to be responsible for Salmonella contamination in salads. The present study revealed the potential hazards of street vended salad vegetables, considering the handling practice usually carried out by vendors. Ninety-eight percent of the vendors did not wash the vegetables before processing and serving while about 56.6% of the vendors did not peel the vegetables. Majority of street vendors' nails were uncut. A significant difference (P < 0.01) was observed in Yersinia spp. and Salmonella spp. in wet-dirty chopping board when compared to clean-dry chopping board. A significant difference (P < 0.05) of Staphylococcus spp. was observed when the status of cleaning cloth was neat/untidy.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24955092 PMCID: PMC4052067 DOI: 10.1155/2014/932191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Incidence of foodborne pathogens in salads given along with street foods in Hyderabad.
| Pathogen | Carrot ( | Onion ( |
|---|---|---|
|
| 39 (73.6%) | 62 (56.4%) |
|
| 31 (58.5%) | 50 (45.5%) |
|
| 36 (67.9%) | 26 (23.6%) |
Mean concentration ranges of Staphylococcus, Salmonella, and Yersinia in salad samples.
| Pathogens | Carrot (min–max) | Mean | Onion (min–max) | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.0–5.2 (102–105) | 4 | 2.0–5.0 (102–105) | 3.2 |
|
| 3.0–5.4 (103–105) | 4.4 | 2.0–5.4 (102–105) | 3.9 |
|
| 3.3–5.4 (103–105) | 4.5 | 2.9–4.8 (102–105) | 3.9 |
*Range of microbial counts (log10 cfu/g).
Figure 2Prevalence of foodborne pathogens in onion samples of Hyderabad city.
Figure 1Process flow diagram for onions.
HACCP analysis of Salmonella (cfu/g) contamination in salads.
| Salad sample | Hand wash | Knife swab | Chopping board swab | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor 1 | ND | 1 × 103 | ND | ND |
| Vendor 2 | 7 × 104 | 12 × 104 | ND | ND |
| Vendor 3 | 3 × 105 | 6 × 103 | 18 × 103 | 5 × 104 |
| Vendor 4 | ND | 6 × 103 | ND | ND |
| Vendor 5 | 3 × 105 | ND | 4 × 103 | 3 × 105 |
| Vendor 6 | ND | 1 × 104 | ND | 1 × 103 |
ND: not detected.
Salad handling practices and preparation and storage practices of 53 street food venders in Hyderabad city.
| Practices | Frequency of responses ( |
|---|---|
| Vegetables from | |
| (a) Market | 49 (92.5) |
| (b) Shop | 4 (7.5) |
| Vegetables brought in | |
| (a) Polythene bag | 23 (43.4) |
| (b) Gunny bags | 30 (56.6) |
| Frequency | |
| (a) Once in a day | 8 (15.1) |
| (b) Once in 2 days | 15 (28.3) |
| (c) Once in 5 days | 16 (30.2) |
| (d) Once in a week | 14 (26.4) |
| Storage | |
| (a) House | 30 (56.6) |
| (b) Stall | 23 (43.4) |
| Storage before cutting | |
| (a) Table | 10 (18.9) |
| (b) Bowl | 11 (20.8) |
| (c) Bucket | 12 (22.6) |
| (d) Refrigerator | 10 (18.9) |
| (e) Others | 10 (18.9) |
| Wash vegetables | |
| (a) Yes | 1 (1.9)* |
| (b) No | 52 (98.1) |
| Peeling vegetables | |
| (a) Yes | 23 (43.4) |
| (b) No | 30 (56.6) |
| Peeled with | |
| (a) Peeler | 1 (1.9) |
| (b) Knife | 22 (41.5) |
| (c) Not peeled | 30 (56.6) |
| Cutting vegetable | |
| (a) Knife | 49 (92.5) |
| (b) Vegetable cutter | 3 (5.7) |
| (c) Grater | 1 (1.9) |
| Status of knife | |
| (a) Clean-dry | 15 (28.3) |
| (b) Wet-dirty | 38 (71.7) |
| Storage after cutting | |
| (a) Open place | 29 (54.7) |
| (b) Container | 24 (45.3) |
| Selling of non-veg. food | |
| (a) Yes | 6 (11.3)~ |
| (b) No | 47 (88.6) |
| Frequent washing of knife | |
| (a) Yes | 6 (11.3) |
| (b) No | 47 (88.7) |
| Cutting and chopping place | |
| (a) Wooden | 48 (90.6) |
| (b) Stainless table | 5 (9.4) |
| Status of cleaning cloth | |
| (a) Neat | 5 (9.4) |
| (b) Dirty | 48 (90.6) |
| Does vendor wear gloves? | |
| (a) No | 53 (100) |
| Frequent washing of hands | |
| (a) Yes | 3 (5.7) |
| (b) No | 50 (94.3) |
| Status of his nails | |
| (a) Neat | 21 (39.6) |
| (b) Dirty | 32 (60.4) |
| Wounds | |
| (a) Cut | 6 (11.3) |
| (b) Wound | 1 (1.9) |
| (c) No wound | 46 (86.8) |
| Status of nails | |
| (a) Cut | 21 (39.7) |
| (b) Uncut | 32 (60.3) |
| Neatly combed | |
| (a) Yes | 16 (30.2) |
| (b) No | 37 (69.8) |
| Uniform | |
| (a) Neat | 12 (22.6) |
| (b) Dirty | 41 (77.4) |
| Status of premises | |
| (a) Near to the water drain | 9 (17) |
| (b) Adjacent to road | 34 (64.2) |
| (c) Near public toilet | 3 (5.7) |
| (d) Near municipal garbage | 4 (7.5) |
| (e) Others | 3 (5.7) |
| Waste disposal | |
| (a) Garbage bin | 40 (75.5) |
| (b) Plastic bag | 12 (22.6) |
| (c) Outside | 1 (1.9) |
| Stray dogs and cats in vicinity | |
| (a) Yes | 53 (100) |
| Rodent droppings | |
| (a) Yes | 31 (58.5) |
| (b) No | 22 (41.5) |
| Insect exposure | |
| (a) Yes | 51 (96.2) |
| (b) No | 2 (3.8) |
*Washing is done with still water. ~Use same knife to cut vegetables and meat.