Literature DB >> 24954933

Modification of a pharmacokinetics course design to improve student performance.

Gregory J Hughes1, Manouchkathe Cassagnol1, Wenchen Wu1, Mary Ann Howland1, Donna Sym1, Gladys M El-Chaar1, Candace J Smith1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of weekly quizzes or reducing the number of faculty members teaching improved third-year (P3) pharmacy students' final grades in a clinical pharmacokinetics course.
DESIGN: Four sections of a pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics course were divided according to the number of faculty members teaching the course and the administration of weekly quizzes. Two sections were taught by 6 faculty members and 2 were taught by 3 faculty members. Also, 1 section in each group received weekly quizzes, creating a 2-by-2 design. ASSESSMENT: The performance of the 201 P3 students enrolled in the course was assessed by comparing the average of 3 examination grades while excluding quiz grades. The mean final grade of classes in which quizzes were not administered was lower than that for classes in which quizzes were administered (p=0.019). The mean final grade in classes taught by 3 faculty members vs 6 faculty members was higher, but not significantly. A positive significant correlation existed between performance in a prerequisite biopharmaceutics class and this advanced class.
CONCLUSION: Making minor modifications to the delivery of a course, such as number of quizzes administered and number of faculty members teaching the course, had a positive impact on student performance. Grades in a prerequisite course may enable earlier identification of students at risk of poor performance in advanced courses.

Keywords:  assessment; pedagogy; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24954933      PMCID: PMC4064493          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe78593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  6 in total

1.  Co-teaching: a faculty development strategy.

Authors:  J D Orlander; M Gupta; B G Fincke; M E Manning; W Hershman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Pharmacy course on women's and men's health.

Authors:  Nesé Yuksel
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A multi-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to integrate basic and clinical sciences content.

Authors:  Srikanth Kolluru; Darren M Roesch; Ayesha Akhtar de la Fuente
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses.

Authors:  Nancy A Letassy; Susan E Fugate; Melissa S Medina; Jeffrey S Stroup; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.

Authors:  John Dunlosky; Katherine A Rawson; Elizabeth J Marsh; Mitchell J Nathan; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2013-01

6.  Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module.

Authors:  Susan E Conway; Jeremy L Johnson; Toni L Ripley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.