S Condello1, C A Morgan2, S Nagdas3, L Cao1, J Turek4, T D Hurley5, D Matei6. 1. Department of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. University of Virginia Medical School, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. College of Veterinary Medicine Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. 1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indianapolis, IN, USA [2] Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. 1] Department of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indianapolis, IN, USA [3] Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA [4] VA Roudebush Hospital, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
Cancer cells form three-dimensional (3D) multicellular aggregates (or spheroids) under non-adherent culture conditions. In ovarian cancer (OC), spheroids serve as a vehicle for cancer cell dissemination in the peritoneal cavity, protecting cells from environmental stress-induced anoikis. To identify new targetable molecules in OC spheroids, we investigated gene expression profiles and networks upregulated in 3D vs traditional monolayer culture conditions. We identified ALDH1A1, a cancer stem cell marker as being overexpressed in OC spheroids and directly connected to key elements of the β-catenin pathway. β-Catenin function and ALDH1A1 expression were increased in OC spheroids vs monolayers and in successive spheroid generations, suggesting that 3D aggregates are enriched in cells with stem cell characteristics. β-Catenin knockdown decreased ALDH1A1 expression levels and β-catenin co-immunoprecipitated with the ALDH1A1 promoter, suggesting that ALDH1A1 is a direct β-catenin target. Both short interfering RNA-mediated β-catenin knockdown and A37 ((ethyl-2-((4-oxo-3-(3-(pryrrolidin-1-yl)propyl)-3,4-dihydrobenzo [4,5]thioeno [3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)thio)acetate)), a novel ALDH1A1 small-molecule enzymatic inhibitor described here for the first time, disrupted OC spheroid formation and cell viability (P<0.001). β-Catenin knockdown blocked tumor growth and peritoneal metastasis in an OC xenograft model. These data strongly support the role of β-catenin-regulated ALDH1A1 in the maintenance of OC spheroids and propose new ALDH1A1 inhibitors targeting this cell population.
Cancer cells form three-dimensional (3D) multicellular aggregates (or spheroids) under non-adherent culture conditions. In ovarian cancer (OC), spheroids serve as a vehicle for cancer cell dissemination in the peritoneal cavity, protecting cells from environmental stress-induced anoikis. To identify new targetable molecules in OC spheroids, we investigated gene expression profiles and networks upregulated in 3D vs traditional monolayer culture conditions. We identified ALDH1A1, a cancer stem cell marker as being overexpressed in OC spheroids and directly connected to key elements of the β-catenin pathway. β-Catenin function and ALDH1A1 expression were increased in OC spheroids vs monolayers and in successive spheroid generations, suggesting that 3D aggregates are enriched in cells with stem cell characteristics. β-Catenin knockdown decreased ALDH1A1 expression levels and β-catenin co-immunoprecipitated with the ALDH1A1 promoter, suggesting that ALDH1A1 is a direct β-catenin target. Both short interfering RNA-mediated β-catenin knockdown and A37 ((ethyl-2-((4-oxo-3-(3-(pryrrolidin-1-yl)propyl)-3,4-dihydrobenzo [4,5]thioeno [3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)thio)acetate)), a novel ALDH1A1 small-molecule enzymatic inhibitor described here for the first time, disrupted OC spheroid formation and cell viability (P<0.001). β-Catenin knockdown blocked tumor growth and peritoneal metastasis in an OC xenograft model. These data strongly support the role of β-catenin-regulated ALDH1A1 in the maintenance of OC spheroids and propose new ALDH1A1 inhibitors targeting this cell population.
Epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal of all gynecologic
malignancies; with the majority of cases being diagnosed at an advanced stage. OC
metastasis is the primary cause of clinical complications and is characterized by
several unique features (1). While in other
epithelial tumors breakdown of the basement membrane is required for tumor invasion
into lymphatics or vasculature and subsequent dissemination of cancer cells to
distant sites (2), hematogenous metastasis is
uncommon in OC. Tumor dissemination occurs directly in the peritoneal cavity; with
most sites of secondary implants involving the mesentery, omentum, and bowel. This
is facilitated by the fact that OC cells at the primary site are in direct anatomic
contact with the overlying peritoneal surface and fluid. Their dislodgement from the
primary tumor on the surface of the ovary or fallopian tube (3), allows cells to float in the peritoneal fluid. Importantly,
after exfoliation from the primary tumor, OC cells form multicellular aggregates or
spheroids (4). These 3D cellular aggregates
serve as the vehicle for dissemination in the peritoneal cavity, protecting cells
from anoikis induced by stress in the extracellular compartment (5, 6).Within spheroid structures, cells adopt mesenchymal features (4, 7) that
are regulated by cytokines and growth factors such as estrogen (8), TGF-β (9), or other proteins secreted in the peritoneal milieu (10, 11).
The mesenchymal phenotype allows cells to invade when they come in contact with the
mesothelium (7), leading to the establishment
of peritoneal implants. We hypothesized that cells forming spheres are enriched in
cancer stem cells (CSCs) (12, 13), allowing development of distant metastases
and persistence after chemotherapy.Recent reports suggest that cells grown as 3D structures behave differently
compared to monolayer cultures and represent a better approximation of tumors
developing in vivo. For instance, spheroids display distinct
genetic expression profiles (14-16), specific intercellular signaling (17-20),
and are subjected to different mechanical forces compared to monolayers (21-23).
The cellular dimensionality and the resulting microenvironment exert a critical
influence on cell survival, impacting drug sensitivity (24, 25) or resistance
(26, 27). OC spheroids can be isolated directly from malignant ascites or
cultured from OC cells by using non-adherent conditions or the hanging drop culture
method (28). In this manuscript we set out to
identify oncogenic pathways regulating formation of multicellular aggregates with
the goal of identifying novel targets enriched in 3D culture models. We hypothesized
that inhibition of such targets would disrupt spheroid formation and block cancer
metastasis.Microarray analysis comparing OC multicellular structures to monolayer
cultures identified ALDH1A1, a known CSC marker, upregulated in
spheroids. ALDH1A1 was part of a gene network with
β-catenin and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
demonstrated that ALDH1A1 is a direct
β-catenin target. Both β-catenin
knockdown and a novel ALDH1A1 inhibitor (A37) prevented multicellular aggregation,
supporting that inhibition of this pathway effectively disrupts spheroid
formation.
Results
Gene expression profiles of OC spheroids
OC cell lines (IGROV1, SKOV3, A2780) and primary OC cells derived from
malignant ascites were grown as monolayers, spheroids, or transitioned back from
spheroid-to-monolayer cultures. When grown under non-adherent conditions, OC
cells formed 3D aggregates with distinct features. For instance, SKOV3adenocarcinoma cells, formed glandular structures with prominent extracellular
matrix secretion; IGROV1 endometrioid cells formed branching spheroids, while
A2780 and OVCA primary cells formed compact round multi-cellular aggregates.
Spheroids derived from human primary cells displayed calcifications, similar to
psammoma bodies formed in humantumors (Figure
1A). To identify genes and pathways upregulated in spheroids, we
compared expression profiles of monolayers, spheroids, or spheroid-to-monolayer
IGROV1 cultures using Affymetrix microarrays. Unsupervised hierarchical
clustering demonstrated distinct profiles of 3D versus 2D cultures, with
reversal of the spheroid genotype when cells were transitioned back to
monolayers (Figure 1B) and ANOVA-based
statistical analysis identified 473 transcripts differentially expressed in
spheroids compared to monolayers (p<0.01 and
FDR<0.01). Of those, 15 transcripts were upregulated > 4 fold and
25 transcripts were downregulated > 4-fold in spheroids versus monolayers
(Tables 1 and 2). Validation of top differentially expressed genes using
semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed up-regulation of aldehyde
dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1), angiopoietin-like 2 (ANGPTL2), thrombospondin
type I (THSD), and neurotensin (NTS) and
downregulation of family 25, member B (FAM25B), v-ets
erythroblasosis virus homolog (ETS) in spheroids compared
to monolayer cultures (Figure 1C).
Figure 1
Gene Expression Analysis of OC spheroids and monolayers
A, Morphology of OC cells grown as spheroids and stained with methylene blue and
fuchsin (400X magnification). Shown are spheroids derived from SKOV3, IGROV1,
A2780 and primary human cells derived from OC ascites. Arrows point to
extracellular matrix deposited by SKOV3 cells and calcifications (psammoma
bodies) formed in the ascites derived spheroids. B, Hierarchical clustering
displays differential expression profiles for IGROV1 cells grown as monolayer,
spheroid, or spheroid to monolayer cultures (n=3 replicates). Rows represent
individual samples and columns represent genes. Each cell corresponds to the
level of expression of a particular gene in a given sample. A visual dual color
code is utilized with red and blue indicating relatively high and low expression
levels, respectively. The scale of color saturation, which reflects the gene
expression levels, is included. C, Differentially expressed genes between
spheroids and monolayer were validated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Densitometry
shows relative gene expression normalized for GAPDH. D, Cell morphology of
SKOV3, IGROV1, and OC primary cells grown as monolayers (m) and spheroids (s),
100X magnification (left panels). Semiquantitative RT-PCR assessed
ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH2, ALDH3A1
mRNA expression levels in SKOV3, IGROV1, and primary OC cells
cultured as monolayers (m) compared with spheroids (s, right panels). E, Flow
cytometry measures Aldefluor positive cells in SKOV3 and IGROV1 cells grown as
spheroids compared to monolayers. DEAB-treated cells serve as negative controls.
Measurements were performed in three replicates.
Table 1
Genes preferentially expressed in OC cell monolayers compared to spheroids
(>4.0)
One of the upregulated transcripts in OC spheroids was
ALDH1A1, a recently recognized stem cell marker (29). Semiquantitative RT-PCR validated
increased mRNA expression levels of ALDH1A1 in
SKOV3 and IGROV1 spheroids compared with monolayers (Figure 1D). Interestingly, the other ALDH1 isoforms (A2 and
A3) or ALDH2 and ALDH3A1 were not upregulated in spheroids compared to monolayer
cultures (Figure 1D), supporting that the
main isoform upregulated in spheroids is ALDH1A1, as identified by gene
expression analysis. Flow cytometry analysis showed an increased percentage of
Aldefluor-positive cells in spheroids compared with monolayers: 25.05% vs. 6.68%
for SKOV3 and 48.0% vs. 20.46% for IGROV1 cells (Figure 1E). The results indicate that culture under ultra-low
adherent conditions selected for a population enriched in Aldefluor-positive
cells which are known to possess self-renewal properties (29, 30).To investigate potential gene interactions in spheroid formation, the
bioinformatics tool from IPA was used and identified 62 gene networks with
statistically significant scores. The top gene networks represented in spheroids
compared to monolayer cultures included: cancer, cellular growth and
proliferation, gastrointestinal disease, cell death and survival, organismal
survival, cellular development, cell cycle, and
cellular
movement (Figure 2A, ranking
scores ranging from 16 to 36). Within the top networks (cancer
and cellular growth and proliferation) ALDH1A1 was a central
node directly connected to β-catenin, c-myc, nuclear protein
transcriptional regulator 1 (NUPR1), T cell factor (TCF), hepatocyte nuclear
factor 4α (HNF4A), and the enhancer binding protein
CEBPB (Figure 2B), suggesting
interactions with these molecules under 3D growth conditions. Because of the
previously recognized role of the β-catenin pathway in the maintenance of
CSCs (31-33), the role of ALDH1A1 as a CSC marker (29, 34), and the
observed network connections between ALDH1A1 and several of the β-catenin
pathway key elements (β-catenin, c-myc, TCF, CEBPB), we
focused subsequent analyses on validating the
β-catenin-ALDH1A1 interaction in the generation of
OC spheroids.
Figure 2
Gene networks in OC monolayers versus spheroids
A, Gene networks generated using the IPA bioinformatics tool were ranked by log
p-values and compared spheroid versus monolayer cultures. Networks with larger
log p-values are more significant. B, Analysis within the top ranked networks
(log p value > 25) displays interconnected genes as nodes. Genes are
colored according to expression level values; red symbols correspond to
up-regulated genes, while green symbols indicate down-regulation. Dashed lines
between nodes show indirect interactions, while continuous lines indicate direct
interactions. C, Semiquantitative RT-PCR assessed mRNA
expression levels for β-catenin and its targets (c-myc
and cyclin D1) in SKOV3 and IGROV1 cells monolayers compared
with spheroids. D, Stacked diagram representing number of genes upregulated
>2 fold or downregulated >2-fold in IGROV1 spheroids vs.
monolayers. Positive and negative Wnt pathway regulators are included (full list
of genes is shown in Supplementary Tables 4 and 5). The RT2 Profiler PCR Array
for human Wnt signaling pathway was used to compare expression profiles in
spheroids vs. monolayer cultures.
B-catenin signaling regulates spheroid formation and self- renewal
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR validated upregulation of
β-catenin and of its target genes
c-myc and cyclin D1 in IGROV1 and SKOV3spheroids compared to monolayers (Figure
2C). An additional exploratory analysis used quantitative RT-PCR for the
human Wnt signaling pathway and demonstrated an overall upregulation of this
pathway in spheroids compared to monolayers cultures. Specifically, 23 Wnt
related transcripts were upregulated > 2-fold in spheroids vs.
monolayers, with 17 genes being known positive regulators of the pathway (Figure 2D and Supplementary Tables 4 and
5). Notably, Frizzled receptors 1, 4, and 7 were upregulated >
4-fold in spheroids cultures, supporting enrichment in Wnt signals leading to
increased β-catenin activity under 3D conditions.To measure β-catenin function in spheroids vs. monolayers, the
TCF/LEF reporter assay was used. A greater than 3-fold increase in TCF/LEF
activity was noted in SKOV3spheroids compared to monolayers, and a lesser
magnitude, but still significant increase was recorded in IGROV1 cells grown as
multi-cellular aggregates (Figure 3A). The
results indicate that the increase in spheroids proliferation was accompanied by
an active β-catenin/TCF transcriptional activity.
Figure 3
β-catenin regulates OC spheroid and tumor formation
A, SKOV3 and IGROV1 cells grown as monolayers were co-transfected with TCF/LEF1
luciferase reporter and Renilla control plasmid, prior to plating as monolayers
or spheroids. Luciferase activity relative to renilla activity compared
monolayers and spheroids at 24 and 48 hours and is expressed as fold increase.
Data are shown as means of duplicate measurements +/− SD. Experiments
were repeated at least three times. Significant differences are marked. B, SKOV3
cells were transfected with scrambled or β-catenin targeting siRNA prior
to plating in ultra-low attachment plates. Sphere counts are shown as means
+/− SD of quadruplicate measurements. C, Semiquantitative RT-PCR measures
β-catenin and c-Myc expression
levels in SKOV3 spheroid cells transfected with scrambled or β-catenin
targeting siRNA. Densitometry shows relative gene expression normalized for
GAPDH. D, Real-time PCR measures the expression levels of β-catenin
target genes c-Myc and cyclin D1 in SKOV3
cells transfected with scrambled or β-catenin targeting siRNA. Data are
shown as means +/− SD of 3 replicate measurements. E, Western blotting
shows β-catenin expression levels in SKOV3 cells stably transduced with
control- and β-catenin targeting shRNA and used for ip inoculation of
nude mice. F, Tumor weights, volumes, and numbers of peritoneal metastases
derived from SKOV3 cells stably transduced with control- and β-catenin
targeting shRNA and injected ip in nude mice (n = 5 and 7, respectively). Data
are shown as means +/− SEM. Significant differences are marked.
To further assess the role of β-catenin signaling in spheroid
formation, SKOV3 cells were transiently transfected with siRNA targeting
β-catenin or with scrambled siRNA prior to plating in ultra-low adherent
plates to allow sphere formation. B-catenin knockdown prevented
aggregation of cells as spheroids, as quantified by microscopic examination
(Figure 3B and Supplementary Figure 1)
and semiquantitative and real time RT-PCR confirmed β-catenin knockdown
and corresponding downregulation of its targets c-myc and
cyclin D1 (Figures
3C-D and Supplementary Figure 1). In all, these data support that
β-catenin/TCF signaling regulates spheroids proliferation.Because of the presumed role of spheroids as vehicles of ip
dissemination and the observed effect of β-catenin knockdown disrupting
multicellular aggregation, we next measured the effects of β-catenin
knockdown on tumor formation and dissemination in an ip xenograft model. For
this, SKOV3 cells were stably transduced with control or β-catenin
targeting shRNA. Decreased β-catenin expression levels were confirmed in
SKOV3 cells transduced with shRNA targeting β-catenin compared to control
shRNA (Figure 3E). Tumor weights (0.17gms
vs. 0.12 gms, p = 0.03) volumes (278.8 mm3 vs. 69.5
mm3, p = 0.01) and number of peritoneal implants
(143 vs. 84, p = 0.002) were significantly decreased in
xenografts derived from SKOV3 cells transduced with shRNA targeting
β-catenin compared to those transduced with control shRNA (Figure 3F). Collectively, these data support
the role of β-catenin in OC spheroid formation contributing to peritoneal
dissemination.
ALDH1A1 is a β-catenin target gene
Further confirmation of β-catenin and ALDH1A1 expression used
three sequential spheroids passages (s1-s3). Phase contrast microscopy
demonstrated that OC cells formed more rapidly compact and large 3D structures
after enzymatic dissociation and passage through several generations (Figure 4A). The spheroids’
self-renewing and growth corresponded to an increase in
β-catenin gene expression. Compared with monolayer
cultures, β-catenin expression levels were up-regulated 2.6- and 4.0-fold
respectively in SKOV3 and IGROV1 first generation spheroids. Further increase in
β-catenin mRNA and protein levels was observed
during the second and third spheroid generations in both cell lines (Figures 4A-B), suggesting its role in the
self-renewal and maintenance of spheroids. Furthermore, cyclin D1 expression
levels, a β-catenin target (35,
36), were also increased in spheroids
vs. monolayers and in subsequent spheroid passages. In parallel, ALDH1A1
mRNA expression levels increased during successive spheroid
generations from ~1.3- and 1.9-fold for the first generation to 3.8- and
3.4-fold for third generation spheroids in SKOV3 and IGROV1 cells, respectively
compared with monolayers (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
ALDH1A1 and β-catenin expression in OCspheroids
A, Cell morphology of SKOV3 and IGROV1 cells grown as monolayers (m) and three
spheroid generations (s1-s3, left panel). Semiquantitative RT-PCR for
β-catenin and ALDH1A1 mRNA expression levels comparing
monolayers and the three generation of spheroids (right panel). B, Western
blotting measures expression levels of β-catenin and cyclin D1 in
monolayer cultures and three spheroid generations. Densitometry quantifies
β-catenin, ALDH1A1, and cyclin D1 expression levels normalized for GAPDH.
C, IF staining for β-catenin (Cy5, red) and ALDH1A1
(AlexaFluor488, green) in SKOV3 cells grown as monolayers or
spheroids (200X magnification). Nuclear β-catenin localization is
identified by emergence of purple spectra on merged images.
Confirmation of ALDH1A1 and β-catenin expression and cellular
localization in monolayers cultures and in spheroids was obtained by
immunofluorescence (IF) based staining and confocal microscopy. ALDH1A1 was not
clearly visualized in monolayer cultures, but was enriched in OC cells grown as
spheroids (Figure 4C). Likewise,
β-catenin expression was increased in cells grown as spheroids compared
to monolayers. Furthermore, while in monolayer cultures, β-catenin was
localized at the plasma membrane, translocation to the nucleus, was observed in
cells aggregated as spheroids (Figure 4C),
suggesting increased transcriptional activity. Increased ALDH1A1 expression was
recorded in cells where β-catenin was expressed and localized in the
nucleus.After establishing the importance of the β-catenin/ALDH1A1 gene
interaction during the formation of spheroids from OC cell lines, we tested
whether these genes also regulate the formation of native spheroids. For this
purpose, we isolated spheroids from humanOC ascites and maintained them in
non-adherent conditions or as monolayers (n=5 specimens). To test
β-catenin and ALDH1A1 expression during successive spheroid generations,
we used enzymatic and mechanical dissociation prior to passage every 7 days.
Figure 5A illustrates increasing number
and more compact spheres formed with each successive passage. The basal
ALDH1A1 and β-catenin mRNA
expression levels increased through successive generations compared with
monolayers and were repressed when spheroids were re-plated as monolayers (Figure 5B), supporting the significance of
this pathway to multicellular aggregation in human primary cells. Flow cytometry
analyzed ALDH1A1 enzymatic activity in monolayer cultures and spheroids derived
from cells isolated from OC ascites, noting ~8.7% vs. 2.9%
Aldefluor-positive cells in spheroids vs. monolayers, respectively, consistent
with observations in cancer cell lines (Figure
5C).
Figure 5
ALDH1A1 is a β-catenin target in OC cells
A, Morphology of primary cells derived from OC malignant ascites grown as
monolayers (m), three spheroid generations (s1-s3), or spheroid to monolayer
culture (s to m). B, Semiquantitative RT-PCR for
β-catenin and ALDH1A1 mRNA
expression levels comparing monolayers, three generation of spheroids, and
spheroid to monolayer cultures. Densitometry quantified β-catenin and
ALDH1A1 normalized with the house-keeping gene 18S. C, Flow cytometry quantifies
Aldefluor positive cells derived from OC ascites and grown as spheroids compared
with monolayers. DEAB-treated cells serve as negative controls. Measurements
were performed in duplicates. D, Semiquantitative RT-PCR for ALDH1A1 expression
levels in SKOV3 cells transfected with scrambled or β-catenin targeting
siRNA. E, Scheme representing the TCF/LEF1 binding sequences within the ALDH1A1
promoter relative to the designed primers (top panel). ChIP assay used chromatin
from IGROV1 cells immunoprecipitated with β-catenin or IgG (control).
Results of PCR amplification are as follows: DNA ladder; chromatin from IGROV1
cells not subjected to IP (input) and amplified with 2 sets of primers
corresponding to the two predicted TCF/LEF1 binding sequences on the
ALDH1A1 promoter (lanes 1-2,f1/r1 and
f2/r2) or with primers corresponding to the TCF/LEF binding site on
the c-myc promoter (lane 3, positive control); chromatin
immunoprecipitated with β-catenin antibody and amplified with
ALDH1A1 promoter specific primers (lanes 4-5, f1/r1 and
f2/r2); ALDH1A1 promoter nonspecific primers (lane 6, up f/r,
negative control), or c-myc promoter specific primers (lane 7,
positive control); or chromatin immunoprecipitated with IgG and amplified with
ALDH1A1 and c-myc specific primers (lanes
8-10, negative controls).
The direct correlation between β-catenin and ALDH1A1 expression
levels observed in spheroids along with the IPA network analysis suggested that
ALDH1A1 may represent a β-catenin target. To test this hypothesis, we
measured ALDH1A1 mRNA expression levels after β-catenin
knockdown. SiRNA mediated β-catenin downregulation induced decreased
ALDH1A1 expression, suggesting that ALDH1A1 is transcriptionally regulated by
β-catenin (Figure 5D). To
definitively demonstrate this concept we searched and identified potential
TCF/LEF responsive elements at positions (-243 to -236), (-147 to-140), (+42
to+48) and (+118 to +124) within the ALDH1A1 promoter sequence (Figure 5E) by using a promoter motif
searching software (PROMO). ChIP tested whether β-catenin interacts with
the ALDH1A1 promoter. PCR amplified the ALDH1A1 promoter fragments corresponding
to the TCF/LEF responsive regions in the chromatin pulled down by a
β-catenin antibody (Figure 5E, lanes
4-5). Specificity of β-catenin antibody binding to ALDH1A1 promoter was
demonstrated by observing no PCR product in chromatin immunoprecipitated with
IgG (Figure 5E, lanes 8-10). These data
demonstrate that ALDH1A1 is a direct β-catenin target in OC cells.
Targeting ALDH1A1 disrupts OC spheroid formation
Having shown that OC multicellular aggregates are enriched in
ALDH1A1+ cells and that ALDH1A1 is a direct β-catenin
target, we next explored whether ALDH1A1 enzymatic inhibitors disrupt spheroid
formation and OC cell survival under non-adherent culture conditions. We used a
novel ALDH1A1 inhibitor (A37) identified through high throughput screening of
the ChemDiv library and the less selective inhibitor DEAB. A37 has a molecular
weight of 431.6 Daltons and no structural similarity to any known aldehyde
dehydrogenase inhibitors (Figure 6A). A37
has good potency (IC50 of 4.6 ± 0.8 μM; Ki
of 300 ± 26 nM) and is selective for ALDH1A1 with no effect on the other
members of the ALDH1A subfamily (ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3), or toward ALDH2 and
ALDH3A1 at concentrations up to 100 μM (Figure 6B). A37 has a competitive mode of
inhibition with respect to varied substrate acetaldehyde (Figure 6C).
Figure 6
Structure, properties, and effects of A37 in OC cells
A, Structure of A37
{(ethyl-2-((4-oxo-3-(3-(pryrrolidin-1-yl)propyl)-3,4-dihydrobenzo[4,5]thioeno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)thio)acetate)}.
B, Normalized residual activity of selected ALDH isoenzymes in the presence of
20 μM A37 in the presence of saturating concentrations of aldehyde
substrate. C, Representative Lineweaver-Burk plot for the non-linear fit to the
competitive inhibition equation for A37 inhibition of ALDH1A1 versus varied
acetaldehydes. D, Aldefluor activity measured by flow cytometry in IGROV1 cells
treated with control (DMSO and DEAB) and A37 (1-50μM) for 3 days. E-G,
Morphology (E), number of spheres (F), and percentage of viable cells measured
by the CCK-8 assay (G) after treatment with DMSO (control) and A37 (1, 5, 10,
25, and 50μM) for 3 days. Data are shown as means of triplicate
measurements +/− SD. Significant differences are marked. H-I, Effects of
cisplatin (25nM-5μM) and A37 (1μM) in OC cells grown as spheroids.
Dose-response curves representing sphere numbers (H) and percentage of surviving
cells (I) were plotted using GraphPad Prism against the logarithmic
concentrations of cisplatin used during a 72h treatment period.
To test the activity of A37 in OC cells, IGROV1 cells grown under low
attachment conditions were used. Under these conditions, the ALDH1A1+
population represents ~30-50% of the cell population. Treatment with A37
blocked ALDH1A1 activity as measured by flow cytometry in IGROV1 cells in a dose
dependent manner and more significantly than DEAB (Figure 6D). A dose response experiment demonstrated dose-dependent
inhibition of spheroid formation starting at 1μM concentration (Figure 6E-F) and dose-dependent decrease in
cell viability at concentrations greater than 1μM (Figure 6G). A37 also induced moderate sensitization of
IGROV1 cells to cisplatin, a common cytotoxic used for the treatment of OC
(Figure 6H-I). Collectively these data
support that targeting of ALDH1A1 with a novel small molecule blocks OC cell
proliferation and survival under 3D culture conditions and synergizes with
chemotherapy.
Discussion
Through genomic profiling we identified ALDH1A1 and
β-catenin signaling, two known pathways regulating CSCs,
as being upregulated and interconnected in OC spheroids compared to monolayer
cultures. We demonstrated that ALDH1A1 is a direct β-catenin
target and that its inhibition by a novel small molecule disrupts formation of
multicellular aggregates. Our data point to novel pathways activated in
anoikis-resistant spheroids and potential new strategies to target them. These
results have several implications.First, we identified a specific gene network activated under 3D conditions
compared to monolayer cultures. Other studies have explored the molecular
characteristics of 3D cultures, demonstrating differences in gene expression based
on culture conditions (37-39). It is increasingly accepted that
multicellular aggregates are a better representation of humantumors compared to
standard cultures on plastic. Cell growth under 3D conditions replicates the
mechanical forces and gradients of oxygen and nutrient existent in native tissues
which regulate cellular polarity, differentiation, and activate various morphogenic
signaling programs. Well established breast cancer 3D models have replicated the
architecture of normal or transformed mammary tissue and helped understanding
cellular differentiation and response to therapy (40-42). OC cells grown as
spheroids display distinct response to chemotherapeutics compared to monolayers
(43, 44) and adopt an invasive phenotype characterized by a
TGF-βfibrotic response that may protect them from unfavorable external
conditions (9, 45). These features suggest that cells grown as spheroids may be
enriched in stem cells. The genomic signature identified in this study identifies
several CSCs markers upregulated in spheroids, including c-KIT,
β-catenin, and ALDH1A1.Second, our data point to β-catenin as an important pathway activated
in spheroids. B-catenin activation has been implicated in the self-renewal and
survival of hematopoietic, cutaneous and gastrointestinal stem cells (33, 46-48), however its role in
ovarian CSCs has not yet been defined. The wingless pathway, which is an upstream
regulator of β-catenin, is required for the maintenance of somatic stem cells
in the Drosophila ovary (49) and activation
of β-catenin has found downstream of the stem cell factor receptor in c-kit
positive ovarian tumor initiating cells (50).
The data presented here identify β-catenin involvement in the formation of OC
multicellular aggregates and demonstrate that its targeting disrupts sphere
formation, cell proliferation under non-adherent conditions, tumor metastasis
in vivo, and expression of the stem cell marker ALDH1A1. These
results suggest that inhibition of this pathway, or of its key downstream elements,
may be instrumental in eliminating OC spheroids containing the stem cell
population.Third, we identified ALDH1A1 upregulation in spheroids
through a non-biased genome mining approach. ALDH1A1 is a member of the highly
conserved ALDH family which includes 18 other enzymes involved in the metabolism of
reactivealdehydes (51). Through their
detoxification functions, ALDHs exert cytoprotective roles in various tissues. In
addition, the enzymes catalyze retinol oxidation to retinal, a limiting step during
the synthesis of retinoic acid, which regulates cellular differentiation. Recent
reports have linked ALDHs, and particularly ALDH1A1, to stem cells, both in normal
(52), and in malignant tissues (53). It remains unknown whether the enzyme
represents only a CSC marker or whether it is implicated in regulating the functions
of stem cells. While several other markers have been proposed to recognize OC stem
cells (13), ALDH1A1 activity detectable
through the aldefluor assay has been validated as a reproducible CSC phenotype
(29, 30). ALDH1A1+ cells have tumor initiating capacity, are
resistant to cisplatin, and express higher levels of stem cell transcription factors
(Sox2, nanog)(30, 34). Here we show that ALDH1A1 expression is increased in
spheroids vs. monolayers and in successive spheroid generations, consistent with the
recognized capacity of stem cells to organize as spheres and to self-renew.
Furthermore we demonstrate that ALDH1A1 is a direct target of
β-catenin, a pathway required in CSCs’ self-renewal (46, 47).
This is the first demonstration that ALDH1A1 expression is regulated by the TCF/LEF
transcriptional complex and our observations strengthen the connection between the
enzyme and an ovarian CSC phenotype.Furthermore, we describe for the first time the activity of a new small
molecule targeting ALDH1A1 in OC spheroids. A37 is a relatively potent
first-generation selective inhibitor for ALDH1A1 with a Ki of 300 nM,
without significant effect on related orthologs in the ALDH family of enzymes. The
effects of this small molecule inhibitor were tested on cells growing as spheres, as
the 3D culture system allows for enrichment in ALDH1A1+ population. This
is the first proof of principle that selective inhibition of ALDH1A1 blocks survival
of OC cells by targeting the ALDH1A1+ population and supports a
functional role for ALDH1A1 in this population. The results support further study of
ALDH1A1 inhibitors alone or in combination with cytotoxics in OC models aiming to
eradicate chemotherapy-resistant and perpetually self-renewing cancer stem
cells.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
Unless stated otherwise, chemicals and reagents were from Sigma (St
Louis, MO, USA). The antibody for cyclin D1 was from Cell Signaling Technology
Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA), for ALDH1A1 from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA), for
β-catenin from ECM Biosciences (Versailles, KY, USA), and for GAPDH from
Biodesign International (Saco, ME, USA). Secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies
were from Amersham Biosciences (San Francisco, CA, USA) and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The Aldefluor kit assay was from
StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, BC Canada). The ALDH1A1 inhibitor (A37) was
from ChemDiv (San Diego, CA, USA), having >95% purity.
Cell culture
The human OC cell lines SKOV3, IGROV1 and A2780 were from the American
Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). De-identified OC ascites samples
were obtained through an IRB approved protocol of the Indiana University Simon
Cancer Center Tissue Bank. Ascites tumor cells were collected by centrifugation
at 200 × g for 3 min. Erythrocytes were lysed by re-suspending the cell
pellet in a 1:4 mixture of cold Hank's balanced salt solution modified (StemCell
Technologies) supplemented with 2% FBS and red blood cell lysis buffer (0.8%
ammonium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) for 5 min. After centrifugation at 350
× g for 5 min, 25,000 ascites derived tumor cells were cultured as
monolayers or spheroids. SKOV3 and primary OC cells were cultured in media
containing 1:1 MCDB 105 (Sigma) and M199 (Cellgro, Herndon, VA, USA)
supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics, while IGROV1 and A2780 cells were
grown in RPMI 1640 at 37°, under a humidified atmosphere containing 5%
CO2.
Spheroid and successive spheroid generation cultures
OC cell lines or primary cells were seeded at a concentration of 25,000
cells/ml in Mammocult complete medium (StemCell Technologies) and ultra-low
attachment plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Spheroids were trypsinized every
7 days and re-plated to generate successive generations. To observe spheroid
morphology, A2780, SKOV3, IGROV1, and primary cells were cultured in a rotating
bioreactor (Synthecon, Houston, TX, USA) until 200-400 μM compact
spheroids were visible (10-30 days). They were harvested, preserved with
Histochoice MB Tissue Fixative (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) for 1 hour, and
embedded in Immuno-bed resin (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Two micron
thick sections were cut on an ultramicrotome and stained with 0.1% methylene
blue/0.15% basic fuchsin in 50% methanol.
Transfection
Stable gene knockdown was obtained by using lentiviral transduction
particles containing shRNA targeting β-catenin or shRNA control (Mission
Lentiviral Transduction Particles from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) into
SKOV3 cells. Lentiviral transduced SKOV3 cells were selected with puromycin (1.5
μM/mL). Transient transfection used a pool of 4 short interfering RNAs
(siRNA) targeting β-catenin (Dharmacon, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; siGenome
SMART pool) or individual siRNA sequences (#1: GCGUUUGGCUGAACCAUCA and #2:
UAAUGAGGACCUAUACUUA, Dharmacon) and DreamFECT transfection reagent (Oz
Biosciences, Marseille, France). Scrambled siRNA pool (Dharmacon) was used as
control.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in ice-cold Radio-Immunoprecipitation Assay (RIPA)
buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, EDTA-free (Thermo
Scientific, Rockford, IL USA). After sonication and centrifugation, equal
amounts of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. After electroblotting, the PVDF
membranes were incubated with primary and HRP–conjugated secondary
antibodies. Immunoreactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence
solution (Thermo Scientific). Images were captured by a luminescent image
analyzer with a CCD camera (ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini, GE Helthcare, Pittsburgh,
PA, USA) and quantified by densitometric analysis using Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1
software (Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted using RNA STAT-60 (Tel-Test Inc., Friendswood,
TX, USA) and reverse-transcribed using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA, USA). Primers and probes used for ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2,
ALDH1A3, ALDH2, ALDH3A1, ANGPTL2, ETS1,
FAM25B, NTS, NOG,
THSD7A, β-catenin, cyclin D1 and
c-Myc expression are included in Supplemental Material (SM),
Tables S1-S2. The reverse transcriptase product (1 μL) and
primers were heated at 94°C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles of
amplification for GAPDH and 28 cycles for the remaining genes. The RT-PCR
products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide
staining under UV light. Real-time PCR was carried out on an ABI Prism 7900
platform (Applied Biosystems) using the FastStart Taqman Probe Master (Rox;
Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The relative expression of different transcripts
(cyclin D1, c-myc) was calculated as
ΔCt and normalized by subtracting the Ct of target genes from that of the
housekeeping control (GAPDH). Results are presented as means
+/− SD of replicates. Each measurement was performed in duplicate and
experiments were run three times in independent conditions.
Wnt Pathway PCR-Array
The human Wnt Signaling Pathway RT2 Profiler PCR Array and
RT2 Real-Timer SyBR Green/ROX PCR Mix were purchased from SA
Bioscience Corporation (Frederick, MD, USA). PCR was performed on ABI Prism 7900
Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems). For data analysis the ΔΔCt
method was used; for each gene, fold-changes being calculated as difference in
gene expression between spheroid and monolayer cultures.
Aldefluor Assay and Flow Cytometry
ALDH1 enzymatic activity was measured using the Aldefluor assay
(Stemcell Technologies). Briefly, dissociated monolayer and spheroid single
cells were resuspended in Aldefluor assay buffer containing the ALDH1 substrate,
bodipyaminoacetaldehyde (BAAA) at 1.5 mM, and incubated for 45 min at 37
°C. The test ALDH1A1-positive population was gated using control cells
incubated under identical condition in the presence of a 10-fold molar excess of
the ALDH inhibitor, diethylamino benzaldehyde (DEAB). The relative increase in
FITC signal of the ALDH-positive cells was determined by a FACS Aria II flow
cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed three times in
independent experiments.
Gene reporter assays
Dual-Luciferase Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was performed to
quantify Wnt/β-catenin signaling through TCF/LEF1 promoter activity in
SKOV3 and IGROV1cells grown as monolayers and spheroids. Cells were transiently
co-transfected with TCF/LEF1 promoter luciferase and Renilla plasmids, at a
ratio of 10:1 using DreamFect Gold transfection reagent (OZ Biosciences).
Luminescence was measured by using TD-20/20 Luminometer (Turner Biosystems,
Madison, WI, USA) 24 hours after transfection. Experiments were performed in
triplicate and repeated twice in independent conditions. To control for
transfection efficiency, luminescence was normalized to Renilla
activity.
Immunofluorescence (IF)
SKOV3 cells grown as monolayers on fibronectin-coated chamber slides (BD
Biosciences) were stained as previously described (54), using β-catenin and ALDH1A1 antibodies. OC
spheroids were fixed, permeabilized, and stained following a previously
described protocol (55). Secondary
antibodies included Cy5-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:500; Zymed) and Alexa
fluor-488 anti-rabbit antibody (1:1000; Molecular Probes, Oregon, USA).
Isotype-specific IgG was a negative control. Nuclei were visualized by
4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Vectashield, Vector
Laboratories) in monolayers and by Hoechst staining (Molecular Probes) in
spheroids. Confocal images were acquired with a confocal/two-photon Olympus
Fluoview FV-1000 MPE system (Olympus America, Central Valley, PA, USA) available
at the Indiana Center for Biological Microscopy (ICBM) facility (Indianapolis,
IN, USA), using an Olympus XLUMPLFL 20×, NA 0.95 water immersion
objective. Images were collected in a sequential illumination mode using 405-,
488- and 633-nm laser lines while fluorescent emission was collected with three
PMTs using 425-475nm, 500-600nm and 655-755nm emission filters. Series of
optical sections through the depth of spheroids (Z-stacks) were collected using
optimal step size settings (1.18 um/slice) with images comprised of
800×800 pixels (488.2 × 488.2μm2). 3D reconstitution used
Voxx software at ICBM (Indianapolis, IN, USA).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
To detect the interaction between the transcriptional complex
β-catenin/TCF/LEF1 and the ALDH1A1 promoter, we used ChIP using a kit
from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA USA, see SM). The DNA was extracted from
β-catenin or IgG immunoprecipitates by using the QIAquick PCR
purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and was subjected to PCR
amplification using primers designed for the TCF/LEF1 binding domain of the
ALDH1A1 promoter (Table S3
SM). The PCR products were resolved by 2 % agarose-ethidium bromide
gel electrophoresis, visualized by UV, and quantified by densitometric analysis
using Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1. As a positive control, DNA immunoprecipitated with
β-catenin antibody was amplified using primers for c-Myc
promoter, a known TCF/LEF1 target gene. As negative control, DNA
immunoprecipitated with β-catenin antibody was amplified with primers
designed for the ALDH1A1 promoter, upstream of the predicted TCF/LEF1 binding
sites.
I.p. ovarian xenograft model
1×106 SKOV3 cells stably transduced with shRNA control
or targeting β-catenin, were injected i.p. in 7–8 weeks old female
nude mice (n= 5 and 7, respectively) from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Four
weeks after injection, mice were euthanized, tumors were harvested, measured
bi-dimensionally if >5mm and peritoneal implants were counted. Tumor
volume was calculated as L*W2/2; where L is length and W is width.
Experiments were approved by the IU Animal Care and Use Committee, being in
compliance with federal regulations.
Discovery and characterization of ALDH inhibitors
ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH2, and ALDH3A1 were produced and purified
as previously described (56). A
high-throughput screen (HTS) of 64,000 compounds from the ChemDiv Corp. was
performed to identify activators and inhibitors of ALDH1A1. The hydrolysis of
para-nitrophenylacetate [27] was used as a measure ALDH1A1 activity (see SM). Selectivity for
closely related orthologs was tested at 20 and 100 μM using purified
recombinant humanALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH2, and ALDH3A1. Dehydrogenase
activity of ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, and ALDH2 were measured in a solution
containing 100–200 nM enzyme, 200 μM NAD+, 1% DMSO, and
100 μM propionaldehyde in 50 mM sodium BES, pH 7.5. ALDH3A1 activity was
measured using 25 nM enzyme, 200 μM NAD+, 1% DMSO, and 1 mM
benzaldehyde in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. All assays were
performed at 25°C and were initiated by the addition of the aldehyde
substrate following a 2 minute pre-incubation with compound and NAD+.
IC50 values were calculated by fitting the data to the four
parameter EC50 equation using SigmaPlot (StatSys v.12.3, San Jose,
CA, USA). The values represent the average of three independent experiments
(each n = 3) using at least two protein preparations. The mode of inhibition was
determined via steady-state kinetics by co-varying inhibitor and substrate
concentrations at fixed concentration of the second substrate. All data were fit
to tight-binding competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and mixed
inhibition models using SigmaPlot (StatSys v.12.3, San Jose, CA, USA).
Cell proliferation and viability
Cell viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay (Dojindo Molecular
Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA). Cell proliferation was quantified by the MTT
assay. Spheroids were counted after centrifugation at 300xg for 5 minutes. All
assays were performed in four replicates. Data are presented as means ±
SEM.
Gene expression profiling
RNA extracted from IGROV1 cells grown as monolayer, spheroids, or
spheroids transferred to monolayer, was labeled using the standard Affymetrix
protocol for the Whole Transcript Target Labeling and Control Reagents kit
(Affimetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the Affymetrix user manual:
GeneChip® Whole Transcript Sense Target Labeling Assay GeneChip. Three
biological replicates were used. Individual labeled samples were hybridized to
the Human Gene 1.0 ST GeneChips® for 17 hours then washed, stained and
scanned with the standard protocol using Affymetrix GCOS (GeneChip Operating
System, Affimetrix). GCOS was used to generate CEL data files, which were
imported into Partek Genomics Suite (PGS, Partek, Inc., St. Louis, Mo).
Authors: Bibek Parajuli; Ann C Kimble-Hill; May Khanna; Yvelina Ivanova; Samy Meroueh; Thomas D Hurley Journal: Chem Biol Interact Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 5.192
Authors: H J Mackay; R J Buckanovich; H Hirte; R Correa; P Hoskins; J Biagi; L P Martin; G F Fleming; R Morgan; L Wang; R Polintan; A M Oza Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: James M Reuben; Bang-Ning Lee; Hui Gao; Evan N Cohen; Michel Mego; Antonio Giordano; Xuemei Wang; Ashutosh Lodhi; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Massimo Cristofanilli; Anthony Lucci; Wendy A Woodward Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Natalie M Moss; Maria V Barbolina; Yueying Liu; Limin Sun; Hidayatullah G Munshi; M Sharon Stack Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Fei Wang; Rhonda K Hansen; Derek Radisky; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Ole W Petersen; Eva A Turley; Mina J Bissell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kate Lawrenson; Maria Notaridou; Nathan Lee; Elizabeth Benjamin; Ian J Jacobs; Christopher Jones; Simon A Gayther Journal: BMC Cell Biol Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 4.241