Mark V Albert1, Sean Deeny2, Cliodhna McCarthy3, Juliana Valentin4, Arun Jayaraman5. 1. Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Department of Computer Science, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL; Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Max Nader, Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL.∗. Electronic address: mva@cs.luc.edu. 2. Department Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Max Nader Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL(†). 3. Max Nader Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA(‡). 4. Max Nader Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA(§). 5. Center for Bionic Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Max Nader Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL(¶).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess in a feasibility study the mobility of persons with transfemoral amputations using data collected from a popular, consumer-oriented activity monitor (Fitbit). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Research hospital outpatient evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Nine subjects with transfemoral amputations (4 women and 5 men, ages 21-64 years) and Medicare functional assessments (K level) of K3 (n = 7), K2 (n = 1), and K4 (n = 1). METHODS: One-week monitoring of physical activity using the Fitbit One activity monitor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily estimates of step counts, distance walked, floors/stairs climbed, calories burned, and proprietary Fitbit activity scores. For each day, the amount of time in each of the following levels of activity was also reported: sedentary, lightly active, fairly active, and highly active. RESULTS: The percentage of movement time above the fairly active level had a predictable relationship to the designated K level. The average activity measures show decreased levels of activity for obese subjects (body mass index >30). Estimated step counts were highly predictive/redundant with estimated miles walked without setting individual stride lengths. Using linear regression prediction models, calorie estimates were found to be highly dependent on subject age, height, and weight, whereas the proprietary activity score was independent of all 3 demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study demonstrates that the Fitbit activity monitor estimates the activity of subjects with transfemoral amputations, producing results that correlate with their K-level functional activity classifications. The Fitbit activity score is independent of individual variations in age, weight, and height compared with estimated calories for this small sample size. These tools may provide useful insights into prosthetic use in an at-home environment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess in a feasibility study the mobility of persons with transfemoral amputations using data collected from a popular, consumer-oriented activity monitor (Fitbit). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Research hospital outpatient evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Nine subjects with transfemoral amputations (4 women and 5 men, ages 21-64 years) and Medicare functional assessments (K level) of K3 (n = 7), K2 (n = 1), and K4 (n = 1). METHODS: One-week monitoring of physical activity using the Fitbit One activity monitor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily estimates of step counts, distance walked, floors/stairs climbed, calories burned, and proprietary Fitbit activity scores. For each day, the amount of time in each of the following levels of activity was also reported: sedentary, lightly active, fairly active, and highly active. RESULTS: The percentage of movement time above the fairly active level had a predictable relationship to the designated K level. The average activity measures show decreased levels of activity for obese subjects (body mass index >30). Estimated step counts were highly predictive/redundant with estimated miles walked without setting individual stride lengths. Using linear regression prediction models, calorie estimates were found to be highly dependent on subject age, height, and weight, whereas the proprietary activity score was independent of all 3 demographic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study demonstrates that the Fitbit activity monitor estimates the activity of subjects with transfemoral amputations, producing results that correlate with their K-level functional activity classifications. The Fitbit activity score is independent of individual variations in age, weight, and height compared with estimated calories for this small sample size. These tools may provide useful insights into prosthetic use in an at-home environment.
Authors: Alix Chadwell; Laura Diment; M Micó-Amigo; Dafne Z Morgado Ramírez; Alex Dickinson; Malcolm Granat; Laurence Kenney; Sisary Kheng; Mohammad Sobuh; Robert Ssekitoleko; Peter Worsley Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Bess H Marcus; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara A Parker; Brittany L Morey Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Peter Ladlow; Tom E Nightingale; M Polly McGuigan; Alexander N Bennett; Rhodri D Phillip; James L J Bilzon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240