Literature DB >> 2495439

Thirty compounds tested in the Drosophila wing spot test.

U Graf1, H Frei, A Kägi, A J Katz, F E Würgler.   

Abstract

The Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART) was evaluated for its suitability in genotoxicity screening by testing 30 chemicals. Of the 2 crosses used, the mwh-flr3 cross turned out to be more convenient than the previously used mwh-flr cross. Based on the experience gained with both acute exposures and chronic exposures of different duration, we suggest that the optimal strategy in genotoxicity screening is to start with chronic exposure of 3-day-old larvae for 48 h (that is, until pupation). Only for unstable compounds and very volatile compounds and gases are acute treatments, including inhalation, recommended. In general, a qualitative evaluation of the genotoxicity of a compound in the wing assay is possible with as few as 1-2 different exposure concentrations. A more quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity, based upon dose-response data, can often be achieved with as few as 3-4 concentrations. The results reported here were obtained in 2 different laboratories, demonstrating that the wing spot test is easily transferable to other laboratories. The experience gained indicates that the assay has now been developed to an extent that a coordinated international comparative validation study is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2495439     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90112-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  13 in total

1.  Induced rates of mitotic crossing over and possible mitotic gene conversion per wing anlage cell in Drosophila melanogaster by X rays and fission neutrons.

Authors:  T Ayaki; K Fujikawa; H Ryo; T Itoh; S Kondo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Analysis of the relationship between age of larvae at mutagen treatment and frequency and size of spots in the wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  U Graf
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1995-02-15

Review 3.  Review of chromium (VI) apoptosis, cell-cycle-arrest, and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  A Chiu; X L Shi; W K P Lee; R Hill; T P Wakeman; A Katz; B Xu; N S Dalal; J D Robertson; C Chen; N Chiu; L Donehower
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Combining Drosophila melanogaster somatic-mutation-recombination and electron-spin-resonance-spectroscopy data to interpret epidemiologic observations on chromium carcinogenicity.

Authors:  A J Katz; A Chiu; J Beaubier; X Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 5.  Genetic and cellular mechanisms in chromium and nickel carcinogenesis considering epidemiologic findings.

Authors:  Arthur Chiu; A J Katz; Jefferson Beaubier; Nancy Chiu; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  Genotoxic evaluation of ten carcinogens in the Drosophila melanogaster wing spot test.

Authors:  M Batiste-Alentorn; N Xamena; A Creus; R Marcos
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1995-01-15

7.  Modulatory effects of Tabebuia impetiginosa (Lamiales, Bignoniaceae) on doxorubicin-induced somatic mutation and recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Neila C de Sousa; Alexandre A A de Rezende; Regildo M G da Silva; Zaira R Guterres; Ulrich Graf; Warwick E Kerr; Mário A Spanó
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  Genotoxicity of lapachol evaluated by wing spot test of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Wender Ferreira Costa; Alaide Braga de Oliveira; Júlio César Nepomuceno
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Publication trends of somatic mutation and recombination tests research: a bibliometric analysis (1984‒2020).

Authors:  Ghada Tagorti; Bülent Kaya
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 10.  The sources, fate, and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products.

Authors:  N B Munro; S S Talmage; G D Griffin; L C Waters; A P Watson; J F King; V Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.