Literature DB >> 24954166

Biased agonism of the μ-opioid receptor by TRV130 increases analgesia and reduces on-target adverse effects versus morphine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers.

David G Soergel1, Ruth Ann Subach, Nancy Burnham, Michael W Lark, Ian E James, Brian M Sadler, Franck Skobieranda, Jonathan D Violin, Lynn R Webster.   

Abstract

Opioids provide powerful analgesia but also efficacy-limiting adverse effects, including severe nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, by activating μ-opioid receptors. Preclinical models suggest that differential activation of signaling pathways downstream of these receptors dissociates analgesia from adverse effects; however, this has not yet translated to a treatment with an improved therapeutic index. Thirty healthy men received single intravenous injections of the biased ligand TRV130 (1.5, 3, or 4.5mg), placebo, or morphine (10mg) in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Primary objectives were to measure safety and tolerability (adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiography, clinical laboratory values), and analgesia (cold pain test) versus placebo. Other measures included respiratory drive (minute volume after induced hypercapnia), subjective drug effects, and pharmacokinetics. Compared to morphine, TRV130 (3, 4.5mg) elicited higher peak analgesia (105, 116 seconds latency vs 75 seconds for morphine, P<.02), with faster onset and similar duration of action. More subjects doubled latency or achieved maximum latency (180 seconds) with TRV130 (3, 4.5mg). Respiratory drive reduction was greater after morphine than any TRV130 dose (-15.9 for morphine versus -7.3, -7.6, and -9.4 h*L/min, P<.05). More subjects experienced severe nausea after morphine (n=7) than TRV130 1.5 or 3mg (n=0, 1), but not 4.5mg (n=9). TRV130 was generally well tolerated, and exposure was dose proportional. Thus, in this study, TRV130 produced greater analgesia than morphine at doses with less reduction in respiratory drive and less severe nausea. This demonstrates early clinical translation of ligand bias as an important new concept in receptor-targeted pharmacotherapy.
Copyright © 2014 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biased ligand; Clinical trial; Morphine; Postoperative pain; mu-Opioid receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24954166     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  93 in total

1.  Biased ligand quantification in drug discovery: from theory to high throughput screening to identify new biased μ opioid receptor agonists.

Authors:  David Winpenny; Mellissa Clark; Darren Cawkill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  G Protein-coupled Receptor Biased Agonism.

Authors:  Sima Y Hodavance; Clarice Gareri; Rachel D Torok; Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 3.  Determinants of opioid abuse potential: Insights using intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Megan J Moerke
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Effects of acute and repeated treatment with the biased mu opioid receptor agonist TRV130 (oliceridine) on measures of antinociception, gastrointestinal function, and abuse liability in rodents.

Authors:  Ahmad A Altarifi; Bethany David; Karan H Muchhala; Bruce E Blough; Hamid Akbarali; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.153

5.  Biased agonists of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 differentially control chemotaxis and inflammation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Smith; Lowell T Nicholson; Jutamas Suwanpradid; Rachel A Glenn; Nicole M Knape; Priya Alagesan; Jaimee N Gundry; Thomas S Wehrman; Amber Reck Atwater; Michael D Gunn; Amanda S MacLeod; Sudarshan Rajagopal
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  A new splice of life for the μ-opioid receptor.

Authors:  Michael J Iadarola; Matthew R Sapio; Andrew J Mannes
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Fulfilling the Promise of "Biased" G Protein-Coupled Receptor Agonism.

Authors:  Louis M Luttrell; Stuart Maudsley; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Functional characterization of a novel opioid, PZM21, and its effects on the behavioural responses to morphine.

Authors:  Lucja Kudla; Ryszard Bugno; Urszula Skupio; Lucja Wiktorowska; Wojciech Solecki; Adam Wojtas; Krystyna Golembiowska; Ferenc Zádor; Sándor Benyhe; Szymon Buda; Wioletta Makuch; Barbara Przewlocka; Andrzej J Bojarski; Ryszard Przewlocki
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  [Pain inhibition by opioids-new concepts].

Authors:  C Stein
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Synthetic and Receptor Signaling Explorations of the Mitragyna Alkaloids: Mitragynine as an Atypical Molecular Framework for Opioid Receptor Modulators.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruegel; Madalee M Gassaway; Abhijeet Kapoor; András Váradi; Susruta Majumdar; Marta Filizola; Jonathan A Javitch; Dalibor Sames
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.